Back in July, I said that Judge Curran should recuse himself from the lawsuits and challenges arising out of the mayoral race, because he gave money to Byron Brown’s campaign.
I don’t mean to say that the Judge did something wrong, or that he would make his decision improperly based on some bias he has in favor of Brown – but the mere fact that that question would be asked and answered means that the Judge should have recused himself, and I applaud him for doing it. It was the right thing, and it really isn’t that big a deal – the case will just get re-assigned to another judge.
And not to impugn Curran’s integrity, either: it’s just that the rules are extremely strict for judges. Their rules don’t just say they have to avoid a conflict of interest – instead, their rules are much stricter:
22 NYCRR section 100.2: A judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge’s activities.
Just because Curran gave Brown or Grassroots $50 doesn’t mean he’d do the wrong thing – but there is the appearance of impropriety, and recusal was the easy choice.
The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.
Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.
Powered by Vote It Up