<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The War Kids 990s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/08/the-war-kids-990s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/08/the-war-kids-990s/</link>
	<description>Buffalo and Western New York&#039;s online news resource</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:03:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Buffalopundit</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/08/the-war-kids-990s/comment-page-3/#comment-25174</link>
		<dc:creator>Buffalopundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6880#comment-25174</guid>
		<description>If Russia invaded Estonia (as it has in the past), we have a treaty obligation to defend it.  Luckily, mutually assured destruction renders unlikely any Russian invasion of a NATO member.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Russia invaded Estonia (as it has in the past), we have a treaty obligation to defend it.  Luckily, mutually assured destruction renders unlikely any Russian invasion of a NATO member.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Ostrowski</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/08/the-war-kids-990s/comment-page-3/#comment-25175</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Ostrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6880#comment-25175</guid>
		<description>We now know a lot more about your views than we do about Powers, Davis and Kryzan.

I don&#039;t believe there is a defense treaty with Israel, but I could be wrong.

Would you really go to war for Estonia against the Russians, the only nation that could wipe us out with nukes.  I would not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We now know a lot more about your views than we do about Powers, Davis and Kryzan.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe there is a defense treaty with Israel, but I could be wrong.</p>
<p>Would you really go to war for Estonia against the Russians, the only nation that could wipe us out with nukes.  I would not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buffalopundit</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/08/the-war-kids-990s/comment-page-3/#comment-25183</link>
		<dc:creator>Buffalopundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6880#comment-25183</guid>
		<description>Gosh, I miss filling out meaningless questionnaires that lead to no endorsement and no money.  So, I&#039;ll take a stab at it:

1. Should the United States pull our troops out of Iraq as soon as is safely possible, spending the funds necessary to insure a safe withdrawal?

No___________ Yes_____X________

2. Should the United States pull our troops out of Afghanistan as soon as is safely possible, spending the funds necessary to insure a safe withdrawal?

No___________ Yes______X________

3. Does the Second Amendment guarantee an individual right to bear arms?

No___________ Yes______X_______ &lt;b&gt;(but only as to firearms available for purchase in 1791)&lt;/b&gt;.

4. Should the federal government continue to subsidize exports?

No___________ Yes_____________  &lt;strong&gt;WTF Does this mean? ______X_______&lt;/strong&gt;

5. Would you eliminate any of the following federal agencies or programs or any others not named? (Check those you would eliminate.)

Agriculture _________
Commerce _________
Education __________
Energy _________
HHS ___________
HUD ___________
Interior ___________
Labor ____________
FEMA ___________
Foreign Aid _________
World Bank ____________
International Monetary Fund ___________
NASA ____________
SBA ___________
Others—please list_____________________________________________

6. Do you oppose or favor corporate welfare (cash grants, loans or special tax breaks to certain businesses)?

Favor_____X_______ Oppose_____________

7. Should the federal government prosecute those who use marijuana for medical purposes?

Favor____________ Oppose____X___________

8. List all foreign states on whose behalf the United States should go to war if they are invaded or attacked?

______ All 191 foreign states (http://www.un.org/members/list.shtml)

_______None

Only these countries:

&lt;b&gt;Countries with whom we have executed a multilateral or bilateral treaty for mutual defense, including but not limited to members of NATO.&lt;/b&gt;

Please explain the legal rationale for doing so, including constitutional provisions and/or treaties.

&lt;strong&gt;Duly ratified and executed international treaties are the Supreme law of the United States. US Constitution Article II, section 2, clause 2; US Constitution Article VI. &lt;/strong&gt;
9. Which best describes your view of government’s role in health care.

a. I like the current system, where health care is highly regulated at all levels of government and heavily subsidized by states and by the federal government._________

b. I favor movement toward a free market in health care, greatly reducing government subsidies and carefully deregulating health care and insurance to eliminate lucrative legal monopolies and to give consumers greater choice.___________

c. I believe that the government should fund and control all health care as in England and Canada.____________

d. Other___&lt;strong&gt;A free market system that also contains provisions for subsidized comprehensive health care coverage for those who cannot afford it.&lt;/strong&gt;

10. Which government spending programs would you enlarge, if any?

&lt;strong&gt;infrastructure (highways &amp; rail)&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, I miss filling out meaningless questionnaires that lead to no endorsement and no money.  So, I&#8217;ll take a stab at it:</p>
<p>1. Should the United States pull our troops out of Iraq as soon as is safely possible, spending the funds necessary to insure a safe withdrawal?</p>
<p>No___________ Yes_____X________</p>
<p>2. Should the United States pull our troops out of Afghanistan as soon as is safely possible, spending the funds necessary to insure a safe withdrawal?</p>
<p>No___________ Yes______X________</p>
<p>3. Does the Second Amendment guarantee an individual right to bear arms?</p>
<p>No___________ Yes______X_______ <b>(but only as to firearms available for purchase in 1791)</b>.</p>
<p>4. Should the federal government continue to subsidize exports?</p>
<p>No___________ Yes_____________  <strong>WTF Does this mean? ______X_______</strong></p>
<p>5. Would you eliminate any of the following federal agencies or programs or any others not named? (Check those you would eliminate.)</p>
<p>Agriculture _________<br />
Commerce _________<br />
Education __________<br />
Energy _________<br />
HHS ___________<br />
HUD ___________<br />
Interior ___________<br />
Labor ____________<br />
FEMA ___________<br />
Foreign Aid _________<br />
World Bank ____________<br />
International Monetary Fund ___________<br />
NASA ____________<br />
SBA ___________<br />
Others—please list_____________________________________________</p>
<p>6. Do you oppose or favor corporate welfare (cash grants, loans or special tax breaks to certain businesses)?</p>
<p>Favor_____X_______ Oppose_____________</p>
<p>7. Should the federal government prosecute those who use marijuana for medical purposes?</p>
<p>Favor____________ Oppose____X___________</p>
<p>8. List all foreign states on whose behalf the United States should go to war if they are invaded or attacked?</p>
<p>______ All 191 foreign states (<a href="http://www.un.org/members/list.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.un.org/members/list.shtml</a>)</p>
<p>_______None</p>
<p>Only these countries:</p>
<p><b>Countries with whom we have executed a multilateral or bilateral treaty for mutual defense, including but not limited to members of NATO.</b></p>
<p>Please explain the legal rationale for doing so, including constitutional provisions and/or treaties.</p>
<p><strong>Duly ratified and executed international treaties are the Supreme law of the United States. US Constitution Article II, section 2, clause 2; US Constitution Article VI. </strong><br />
9. Which best describes your view of government’s role in health care.</p>
<p>a. I like the current system, where health care is highly regulated at all levels of government and heavily subsidized by states and by the federal government._________</p>
<p>b. I favor movement toward a free market in health care, greatly reducing government subsidies and carefully deregulating health care and insurance to eliminate lucrative legal monopolies and to give consumers greater choice.___________</p>
<p>c. I believe that the government should fund and control all health care as in England and Canada.____________</p>
<p>d. Other___<strong>A free market system that also contains provisions for subsidized comprehensive health care coverage for those who cannot afford it.</strong></p>
<p>10. Which government spending programs would you enlarge, if any?</p>
<p><strong>infrastructure (highways &amp; rail)</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/08/the-war-kids-990s/comment-page-3/#comment-25182</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6880#comment-25182</guid>
		<description>First of all, you just admitted it&#039;s a set up.  You want to have their answers in writing so you can use it against them later when you think they didn&#039;t follow through on it.

Secondly, wouldn&#039;t blather and sound bites be better than nothing?  It sounds like you haven&#039;t gotten any response from your survey ever, so why is that a better idea than mine?

If you dying of cancer and writhing in pain, are you really concerned at that moment about who you&#039;re going to vote for.  Avoid the hyperbole. Besides, there are other medicines used to treat that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, you just admitted it&#8217;s a set up.  You want to have their answers in writing so you can use it against them later when you think they didn&#8217;t follow through on it.</p>
<p>Secondly, wouldn&#8217;t blather and sound bites be better than nothing?  It sounds like you haven&#8217;t gotten any response from your survey ever, so why is that a better idea than mine?</p>
<p>If you dying of cancer and writhing in pain, are you really concerned at that moment about who you&#8217;re going to vote for.  Avoid the hyperbole. Besides, there are other medicines used to treat that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Ostrowski</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/08/the-war-kids-990s/comment-page-3/#comment-25181</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Ostrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6880#comment-25181</guid>
		<description>70-80% in some polls favor medical marijuana.  If you are dying of cancer and writhing in pain, it might be a big issue.  I think it’s a good symbolic issue as well about a range of things: federal role in law enforcement, civil liberties, war on drugs, spending priorities.

There&#039;s a method to our Reefer Madness.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?emb=0&amp;eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2Fvideosearch%3Fq%3Dmedical+marijuana+romney&amp;v=NY6UTnS6Z-A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>70-80% in some polls favor medical marijuana.  If you are dying of cancer and writhing in pain, it might be a big issue.  I think it’s a good symbolic issue as well about a range of things: federal role in law enforcement, civil liberties, war on drugs, spending priorities.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a method to our Reefer Madness.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?emb=0&amp;eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2Fvideosearch%3Fq%3Dmedical+marijuana+romney&amp;v=NY6UTnS6Z-A" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?emb=0&amp;eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2Fvideosearch%3Fq%3Dmedical+marijuana+romney&amp;v=NY6UTnS6Z-A</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Humanist</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/08/the-war-kids-990s/comment-page-3/#comment-25180</link>
		<dc:creator>The Humanist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6880#comment-25180</guid>
		<description>@ Ostrowski:

&lt;i&gt;7. Should the federal government prosecute those who use marijuana for medical purposes?&lt;/i&gt;


I wasn&#039;t aware federal prosecution of medical marijuana users was such a &quot;burning&quot; issue (sorry for the pun) for the voters of NY-26.

Can we expect future surveys on the candidates&#039; opinions on abolishing the federal government?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ostrowski:</p>
<p><i>7. Should the federal government prosecute those who use marijuana for medical purposes?</i></p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t aware federal prosecution of medical marijuana users was such a &#8220;burning&#8221; issue (sorry for the pun) for the voters of NY-26.</p>
<p>Can we expect future surveys on the candidates&#8217; opinions on abolishing the federal government?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Ostrowski</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/08/the-war-kids-990s/comment-page-3/#comment-25179</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Ostrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6880#comment-25179</guid>
		<description>&quot;A survey with as much insane libertarian framing like that is as useful as tits on a bull.&quot;

This refutes itself.  The survey would allow this illibertarian to sniff out anyone who believes in individual freedom and vote against them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A survey with as much insane libertarian framing like that is as useful as tits on a bull.&#8221;</p>
<p>This refutes itself.  The survey would allow this illibertarian to sniff out anyone who believes in individual freedom and vote against them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Ostrowski</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/08/the-war-kids-990s/comment-page-3/#comment-25184</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Ostrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6880#comment-25184</guid>
		<description>No Russell, you&#039;re wrong.  The survey does not say what Free NY&#039;s views are.  And even if everyone knows what they are, so what?  The candidates are free to state their views.  In fact, if our views are as unpopular as some imply, they should be happy to oppose them.

The reason for a survey is to compare.  Elections are choices.  Also, if you ask the candidates to state their views, they will, if experience is any judge, give us blather and sound bites.

Example, &quot;running government like a business.&quot;  Someone was recently elected on that &quot;platform.&quot;  Since it is not in any sense possible to do so (it’s a misleading metaphor), we will never know if that person fulfilled his promise.

That person by the way refused to answer our survey which would actually have pinned down that person so the voters could know if he did what he promised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Russell, you&#8217;re wrong.  The survey does not say what Free NY&#8217;s views are.  And even if everyone knows what they are, so what?  The candidates are free to state their views.  In fact, if our views are as unpopular as some imply, they should be happy to oppose them.</p>
<p>The reason for a survey is to compare.  Elections are choices.  Also, if you ask the candidates to state their views, they will, if experience is any judge, give us blather and sound bites.</p>
<p>Example, &#8220;running government like a business.&#8221;  Someone was recently elected on that &#8220;platform.&#8221;  Since it is not in any sense possible to do so (it’s a misleading metaphor), we will never know if that person fulfilled his promise.</p>
<p>That person by the way refused to answer our survey which would actually have pinned down that person so the voters could know if he did what he promised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/08/the-war-kids-990s/comment-page-3/#comment-25187</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6880#comment-25187</guid>
		<description>If your real intent is to get candidates to talk about something meaningful, concrete proposals and issues, just ask them what issues are most important to them and why.  What do they plan to propose to do about them?  Instead, what you&#039;re asking the candidates is to talk about your proposals and whether or not they agree with your issues.  That&#039;s the set up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your real intent is to get candidates to talk about something meaningful, concrete proposals and issues, just ask them what issues are most important to them and why.  What do they plan to propose to do about them?  Instead, what you&#8217;re asking the candidates is to talk about your proposals and whether or not they agree with your issues.  That&#8217;s the set up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/08/the-war-kids-990s/comment-page-3/#comment-25186</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6880#comment-25186</guid>
		<description>The questions look perfectly legitimate to me.  I guess if Jim O. had asked &quot;what&#039;s your favorite Bible passage&quot; like St. Russert, that would have been better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The questions look perfectly legitimate to me.  I guess if Jim O. had asked &#8220;what&#8217;s your favorite Bible passage&#8221; like St. Russert, that would have been better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
