<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Primaries FTW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/09/primaries-ftw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/09/primaries-ftw/</link>
	<description>Buffalo and Western New York&#039;s online news resource</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:03:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Domst</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/09/primaries-ftw/comment-page-3/#comment-27266</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Domst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6979#comment-27266</guid>
		<description>The point is that some people vote overwhelmingly on one issue, or vote for character over issues, and they&#039;re not necessarily crazy to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is that some people vote overwhelmingly on one issue, or vote for character over issues, and they&#8217;re not necessarily crazy to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike hudson</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/09/primaries-ftw/comment-page-3/#comment-27267</link>
		<dc:creator>mike hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 06:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6979#comment-27267</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m leaning toward bob barr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m leaning toward bob barr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Splett</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/09/primaries-ftw/comment-page-3/#comment-27268</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Splett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6979#comment-27268</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re missing the point here.

The democratic party isn&#039;t exactly hard up for money. Federal matching funds aren&#039;t a factor for the two major parties.

For third parties, they&#039;re freaking HUGE.

And again, this is so far away from what I was talking about it&#039;s silly. When I say I&#039;m not an environmentalist, I mean I don&#039;t take that in to consideration when voting because I don&#039;t care. If someone wants to save the whales and I agree with everything else they say, I&#039;ll vote for them. If someone wants to club baby seals for the sheer joy of watching them die but agrees with everything else I believe, I&#039;ll vote for him. I just don&#039;t care either way. A pro-life democrat who votes republican throws away everything else they believe in over one issue. That&#039;s retarded and if it&#039;s THAT important to them that NONE of the rest of the platform matters, why the hell are they registering as a democrat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re missing the point here.</p>
<p>The democratic party isn&#8217;t exactly hard up for money. Federal matching funds aren&#8217;t a factor for the two major parties.</p>
<p>For third parties, they&#8217;re freaking HUGE.</p>
<p>And again, this is so far away from what I was talking about it&#8217;s silly. When I say I&#8217;m not an environmentalist, I mean I don&#8217;t take that in to consideration when voting because I don&#8217;t care. If someone wants to save the whales and I agree with everything else they say, I&#8217;ll vote for them. If someone wants to club baby seals for the sheer joy of watching them die but agrees with everything else I believe, I&#8217;ll vote for him. I just don&#8217;t care either way. A pro-life democrat who votes republican throws away everything else they believe in over one issue. That&#8217;s retarded and if it&#8217;s THAT important to them that NONE of the rest of the platform matters, why the hell are they registering as a democrat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Domst</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/09/primaries-ftw/comment-page-3/#comment-27269</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Domst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6979#comment-27269</guid>
		<description>Thank you for making my argument for me, a pro-life Catholic could say the exact same thing about registering Democratic, they wouldn&#039;t want to be in an ineffective party like Right To Life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for making my argument for me, a pro-life Catholic could say the exact same thing about registering Democratic, they wouldn&#8217;t want to be in an ineffective party like Right To Life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Splett</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/09/primaries-ftw/comment-page-3/#comment-27270</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Splett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6979#comment-27270</guid>
		<description>I really shouldn&#039;t be in any party but I register Green because of all the fringy left leaning parties, they seem to have the most support and if I register as a Green they have a better chance of getting federal matching funds. If it wasn&#039;t for my desire to see someone on my side get some federal funds and I could register as anything, I probably would have registered as a socialist. Apparently you think I should be ashamed of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really shouldn&#8217;t be in any party but I register Green because of all the fringy left leaning parties, they seem to have the most support and if I register as a Green they have a better chance of getting federal matching funds. If it wasn&#8217;t for my desire to see someone on my side get some federal funds and I could register as anything, I probably would have registered as a socialist. Apparently you think I should be ashamed of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Domst</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/09/primaries-ftw/comment-page-3/#comment-27271</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Domst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6979#comment-27271</guid>
		<description>Snarky, you stupid piece of shit, Spitzer increased penalties for patronizing prostitutes.

As a part of legislation signed by Mr. Spitzer in June creating stiff new criminal penalties for those who force others to engage in sex or other labor, Mr. Spitzer approved an increase in the penalty under New York&#039;s law against patronizing a prostitute in New York to one year in prison from 90 days (Penal Law §230.04).

He&#039;s a huge hypocrite, and hypocrisy is a character flaw, you retard.  He also undermined all the work his supporters did, giving easy opportunity for his enemies to oust him.

Splett, you think Democrats can&#039;t vote on abortion, but you are a member of the Green party, and environmentalism doesn&#039;t sway you.  If those Dems should be in the Right To Life party as you say, you should be in the Socialist Workers Party.

Like I just said above, in my opinion Spitzer&#039;s flaw wasn&#039;t going to a prostitute, but attacking prostitution publicly and legally while doing it privately.  I don&#039;t think it should be illegal either and I said so on this site in March.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snarky, you stupid piece of shit, Spitzer increased penalties for patronizing prostitutes.</p>
<p>As a part of legislation signed by Mr. Spitzer in June creating stiff new criminal penalties for those who force others to engage in sex or other labor, Mr. Spitzer approved an increase in the penalty under New York&#8217;s law against patronizing a prostitute in New York to one year in prison from 90 days (Penal Law §230.04).</p>
<p>He&#8217;s a huge hypocrite, and hypocrisy is a character flaw, you retard.  He also undermined all the work his supporters did, giving easy opportunity for his enemies to oust him.</p>
<p>Splett, you think Democrats can&#8217;t vote on abortion, but you are a member of the Green party, and environmentalism doesn&#8217;t sway you.  If those Dems should be in the Right To Life party as you say, you should be in the Socialist Workers Party.</p>
<p>Like I just said above, in my opinion Spitzer&#8217;s flaw wasn&#8217;t going to a prostitute, but attacking prostitution publicly and legally while doing it privately.  I don&#8217;t think it should be illegal either and I said so on this site in March.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Humanist</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/09/primaries-ftw/comment-page-3/#comment-27272</link>
		<dc:creator>The Humanist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6979#comment-27272</guid>
		<description>@Hank -

&quot;What I do see happening is President McCain telling the congress not to bother sending any more spending bills packed with earmarks, as he’s not going to sign them.&quot;

Oh really? Would that be before or after VP Hockey Mom Pitbull Kills Caribou With Her Bare Hands pulls him aside and threatens to cut off his nuts if he doesn&#039;t shower Alaska with that sweet, sweet federal moolah like she&#039;s done the last year and a half?

The last time &quot;Maverick&quot; McCain saw his balls was when he handed them over in a silver box to Beer Money Cindy to jumpstart his political career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hank -</p>
<p>&#8220;What I do see happening is President McCain telling the congress not to bother sending any more spending bills packed with earmarks, as he’s not going to sign them.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh really? Would that be before or after VP Hockey Mom Pitbull Kills Caribou With Her Bare Hands pulls him aside and threatens to cut off his nuts if he doesn&#8217;t shower Alaska with that sweet, sweet federal moolah like she&#8217;s done the last year and a half?</p>
<p>The last time &#8220;Maverick&#8221; McCain saw his balls was when he handed them over in a silver box to Beer Money Cindy to jumpstart his political career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/09/primaries-ftw/comment-page-3/#comment-27273</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6979#comment-27273</guid>
		<description>Hank do you really believe the promises? Didn&#039;t the Bush say the samething in 1999 or was your head too far up his ass to hear it?  So now you are falling for the same song and dance. How&#039;s your pig looking with her lipstick ?

Hudson, old politicians or judges never die they just move over to another nipple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hank do you really believe the promises? Didn&#8217;t the Bush say the samething in 1999 or was your head too far up his ass to hear it?  So now you are falling for the same song and dance. How&#8217;s your pig looking with her lipstick ?</p>
<p>Hudson, old politicians or judges never die they just move over to another nipple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hank</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/09/primaries-ftw/comment-page-3/#comment-27274</link>
		<dc:creator>hank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6979#comment-27274</guid>
		<description>Haterade--Frankly I&#039;ve been a bit frightened the last couple of weeks reading your comments--we&#039;re way too much in agreement on what you&#039;re saying. I guess you just moved up from the &quot;just the card&quot; Xmas list to the gift list.

Personality and character mean more in a Congressman than how they will carry the Party&#039;s water.  I would expect a congressman to vote NO on bills that adversely affect their district, whether the Party tells them to vote YES or not.

We need people in Congress that can see the totally out-of-control earmark spending by BOTH parties has to come to an end, and they should give the President, regardless of the party he or she belongs to the line item veto. Since they don&#039;t have the guts to not rape our wallets to retain their employment, they should surrender their lack of fiscal discipline to a higher power--the Executive.

Nobody likes having their pockets picked--whether its by a criminal, a union, or the government.  And a line item veto could end earmarks.

Frankly I doubt there will EVER be a clearing out of the incumbents that would allow this to happen.

What I do see happening is President McCain telling the congress not to bother sending any more spending bills packed with earmarks, as he&#039;s not going to sign them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haterade&#8211;Frankly I&#8217;ve been a bit frightened the last couple of weeks reading your comments&#8211;we&#8217;re way too much in agreement on what you&#8217;re saying. I guess you just moved up from the &#8220;just the card&#8221; Xmas list to the gift list.</p>
<p>Personality and character mean more in a Congressman than how they will carry the Party&#8217;s water.  I would expect a congressman to vote NO on bills that adversely affect their district, whether the Party tells them to vote YES or not.</p>
<p>We need people in Congress that can see the totally out-of-control earmark spending by BOTH parties has to come to an end, and they should give the President, regardless of the party he or she belongs to the line item veto. Since they don&#8217;t have the guts to not rape our wallets to retain their employment, they should surrender their lack of fiscal discipline to a higher power&#8211;the Executive.</p>
<p>Nobody likes having their pockets picked&#8211;whether its by a criminal, a union, or the government.  And a line item veto could end earmarks.</p>
<p>Frankly I doubt there will EVER be a clearing out of the incumbents that would allow this to happen.</p>
<p>What I do see happening is President McCain telling the congress not to bother sending any more spending bills packed with earmarks, as he&#8217;s not going to sign them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike hudson</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/buffalopundit/2008/09/primaries-ftw/comment-page-3/#comment-27275</link>
		<dc:creator>mike hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/archives/6979#comment-27275</guid>
		<description>@pundit -- so progressives or liberals or whatever they&#039;re called these days should aspire to the sewer where sean hannity dwells? that&#039;s not something i want to be a part of.

@byron -- olbermann&#039;s remarks are more insipid and contemptable in print than they were when i heard them last night. american politics is not supposed to be about making the other side evil, it&#039;s supposed to be about ideas, and which ideas are right for our country.

if you think that olbermann really cares about who wins the election, you&#039;re as big a moron as the dittoheads who religously listen to rush. olbermann was fired from fox, but if they&#039;d have elevated him to the position he now holds at msnbc he&#039;d be attacking obama.

and in anticipation of your witty comeback, no, he wasn&#039;t fired by fox for his principaled political viewpoints, he was fired because of on the air bitching about having to cover the o.j. simpson case. much like dennis miller, who was great when he did the news on &quot;saturday night live,&quot; olbermann has become a parody of his former witty and entertaining self.

when he did his first &quot;special comment,&quot; the one about donald rumsfeld, it was genuine, spot on, and superbly delivered. the piece you quote is just schtick for the bumpkins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pundit &#8212; so progressives or liberals or whatever they&#8217;re called these days should aspire to the sewer where sean hannity dwells? that&#8217;s not something i want to be a part of.</p>
<p>@byron &#8212; olbermann&#8217;s remarks are more insipid and contemptable in print than they were when i heard them last night. american politics is not supposed to be about making the other side evil, it&#8217;s supposed to be about ideas, and which ideas are right for our country.</p>
<p>if you think that olbermann really cares about who wins the election, you&#8217;re as big a moron as the dittoheads who religously listen to rush. olbermann was fired from fox, but if they&#8217;d have elevated him to the position he now holds at msnbc he&#8217;d be attacking obama.</p>
<p>and in anticipation of your witty comeback, no, he wasn&#8217;t fired by fox for his principaled political viewpoints, he was fired because of on the air bitching about having to cover the o.j. simpson case. much like dennis miller, who was great when he did the news on &#8220;saturday night live,&#8221; olbermann has become a parody of his former witty and entertaining self.</p>
<p>when he did his first &#8220;special comment,&#8221; the one about donald rumsfeld, it was genuine, spot on, and superbly delivered. the piece you quote is just schtick for the bumpkins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
