Chris Lee: Every Debate Left Behind

Amherst, NY – Today, congressional candidate Alice Kryzan, NY-26, called on her opponent Chris Lee to make good on his pledge to focus on the issues in this race by agreeing to participate in public debates. To date, Kryzan has committed to a number of public debates in order to let the voters hear directly from her, while Chris Lee has become an expert in debate dodging.

Of seven proposed debates, Lee has pulled out of two debates he had previously committed to and seems unwilling or unable to fit another four into his schedule. Lee has dodged debates at SUNY Geneseo, RNews and a candidate forum sponsored by the AARP, which has over 100,000 members in the district.

Lee also appears unwilling to explain his positions to voters who have contacted him directly. Recently a non-partisan group was unable to get answers from Lee on important issues such as trade, health care and jobs despite repeated requests by phone, e-mail and a personal visit to his campaign headquarters.

“For someone who claims to want to make this campaign about the issues, he’s fallen short,” said spokesperson Anne Wadsworth. “Few policy positions, few statements, few debates. It’s hard for voters to have any idea what Chris Lee stands for.”

It’s time for Lee to stop dodging and start debating. Public debates are a crucial chance for voters to understand how candidates plan to address the issues facing their lives. In these turbulent times, voters need to know where candidates stand more than ever.

The Kryzan campaign calls on Lee to commit to a series of public debates so that voters can understand the very real policy differences between the two candidates. The people of this district deserve no less.

4 Comments

  1. Dave A. says:

    It’s not unexpected, and to a sad degree debates aren’t even as useful as they used to be. The parties are so polarized that too many voters have their flags planted before they even know who the candidates are.

  2. Facts Plz says:

    I remember a time not so long ago when King Eliot refused to debate the challenger Suozzi… I guess the common knowledge is that when you are in the lead, you dont need to accept debates.

    BTW, has Mesi agreed to debate Ranzenhofer yet?

  3. heavyweight says:

    Yup, Mesi has agreed to debate Ranzenhofer on all but 2 debates if I’m not mistaken.

    Lee is pathetic to be skipping debates. Democracy? notsomuch.

  4. Russell says:

    It’s normal in political campaigns that the incumbent or the candidate with the clear lead in the polls should avoid debates. If the polls are close or the incumbent feels in trouble, then he/she should debate. Someone that’s 10-points or more up in the polls should avoid sharing a stage with the opponent. It can only benefit the opponent. I’m sure it bothers Alice and her supporters that Lee has no need to debate her. Besides, this isn’t the presidential election. Who actually attends or watches these debates? It’s pretty much a non-story.

 

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up