<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Chapter For BuffaloGeek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/smith/2008/01/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/smith/2008/01/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/</link>
	<description>Buffalo and Western New York&#039;s online news resource</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:42:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Buffalo Geek &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What&#8217;s This? The Geek Is Gonna Blog?</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/smith/2008/01/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/comment-page-1/#comment-5000</link>
		<dc:creator>Buffalo Geek &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What&#8217;s This? The Geek Is Gonna Blog?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalogeek.wnymedia.net/blogs/2008/01/29/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/#comment-5000</guid>
		<description>[...] announced my semi-retirement from long form blogging a few months back and moved into the short form blog world of Twitter and other lifestreaming [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] announced my semi-retirement from long form blogging a few months back and moved into the short form blog world of Twitter and other lifestreaming [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Smith</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/smith/2008/01/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/comment-page-1/#comment-4999</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalogeek.wnymedia.net/blogs/2008/01/29/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/#comment-4999</guid>
		<description>Jen, we can certainly include your content into the feeds, that&#039;s cool.  I appreciate your desire to stay on your own, no hard feelings.  You do what you wanna do, we&#039;ll do what we do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jen, we can certainly include your content into the feeds, that&#8217;s cool.  I appreciate your desire to stay on your own, no hard feelings.  You do what you wanna do, we&#8217;ll do what we do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/smith/2008/01/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/comment-page-1/#comment-4998</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalogeek.wnymedia.net/blogs/2008/01/29/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/#comment-4998</guid>
		<description>Me personally? I wanted to be able to access my blog anytime I needed to, which is several times a day every day and while I found your business venture to be a good idea, several times it did not allow for me to access what I needed. So very many changes in such a short time! I feel like I was just waiting for something more stable before getting back on board.

And I started blogging way before Buffalo Rising...etc...as well and wanted to be able to continue doing the thing I love to do without bumps along the way (selfish, maybe? But I&#039;m not a fizzler!!!) Most of my readers came from before I started the gig over at wnymedia and most of them did not like that they couldn&#039;t just go to my personal blog and read the content without having to click links. And since I agree and want those 300ish people a day to keep reading, I switched over to allthingsjennifer.com until figuring out how to incorporate any of my posts into your main feed. If there still is a way to *borrow* repost? the content I am putting up into the main feed, I am more than happy to be a part of the team, I just know that when I started doing this, I did it for me...and I needed to stay true to what I needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me personally? I wanted to be able to access my blog anytime I needed to, which is several times a day every day and while I found your business venture to be a good idea, several times it did not allow for me to access what I needed. So very many changes in such a short time! I feel like I was just waiting for something more stable before getting back on board.</p>
<p>And I started blogging way before Buffalo Rising&#8230;etc&#8230;as well and wanted to be able to continue doing the thing I love to do without bumps along the way (selfish, maybe? But I&#8217;m not a fizzler!!!) Most of my readers came from before I started the gig over at wnymedia and most of them did not like that they couldn&#8217;t just go to my personal blog and read the content without having to click links. And since I agree and want those 300ish people a day to keep reading, I switched over to allthingsjennifer.com until figuring out how to incorporate any of my posts into your main feed. If there still is a way to *borrow* repost? the content I am putting up into the main feed, I am more than happy to be a part of the team, I just know that when I started doing this, I did it for me&#8230;and I needed to stay true to what I needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Meyer</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/smith/2008/01/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/comment-page-1/#comment-4997</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalogeek.wnymedia.net/blogs/2008/01/29/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/#comment-4997</guid>
		<description>I miss the &quot;old&quot; Buffalo Geek blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss the &#8220;old&#8221; Buffalo Geek blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BfloBlog.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Doings Around the Network</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/smith/2008/01/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/comment-page-1/#comment-4990</link>
		<dc:creator>BfloBlog.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Doings Around the Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalogeek.wnymedia.net/blogs/2008/01/29/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/#comment-4990</guid>
		<description>[...] writing portal was in the works for WNYMedia.net, I was still surprised when he announced the end of the BuffaloGeek blog as we know [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] writing portal was in the works for WNYMedia.net, I was still surprised when he announced the end of the BuffaloGeek blog as we know [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Miller</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/smith/2008/01/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/comment-page-1/#comment-4991</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalogeek.wnymedia.net/blogs/2008/01/29/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/#comment-4991</guid>
		<description>Chris, I originally wanted to keep my own site, but due to the lack of available time, I will give it up to post on the portal. Is there some way I can keep some of my posts? I wrote some personal stories that I&#039;d like to keep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I originally wanted to keep my own site, but due to the lack of available time, I will give it up to post on the portal. Is there some way I can keep some of my posts? I wrote some personal stories that I&#8217;d like to keep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Smith</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/smith/2008/01/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/comment-page-1/#comment-4992</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 05:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalogeek.wnymedia.net/blogs/2008/01/29/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/#comment-4992</guid>
		<description>Actually, it did make sense, it just no longer works for us.  When WNYM began, there were a total of 12-15 active blogs in Buffalo.  BRO was not yet online and many of the local bloggers decided there was value in maintaining their individual sites on a shared host and domain.  With one repository for information, it was easier for a new reader to discover a plethora of voices in one place and the writers were able to maintain their virtual identities.

With the exception of a few (Punaro, Kelly, Erin) most writers hopped onboard with the concept.  Over time, many of those blogs fizzled out (as most blogs do) and there was an explosion in the local blog scene.  The value proposition of a local &quot;independent blog hub&quot; lost some of its luster and we didn&#039;t spend enough time tending our own garden to recruit and develop new writers.  We value independence of thought and wanted to avoid the stilted groupthink that inevitably develops on editorially centralized sites like BlogTO and BRO.

We thought we had a model that worked for us and it still does, we&#039;re just making an adjustment to it.  Each writer will still have their own page, but publication of articles to the frontpage of the portal will be simplified and we&#039;ll be better able to drive a unified portal on which readers can discover new content.  We&#039;ll also be more agile when it comes to adding writers who don&#039;t care about a personal blog page and simply wish to contribute articles on issues in which they hold some sort of expertise.  I think what we&#039;re trying to do here is similar to &quot;group placeblogs&quot; but with a small twist.

As to giving a blog page to &quot;anyone who wants one&quot;, well, every blog has an audience.  No matter how vapid or amateurish you may find some of our current and past bloggers, they all find their own audience.  You might not like the way they write or what they have to say, but the site looks like Buffalo.  Suburbanites, urbanites, businespeople, blue collar workers, politicians, government employees, students, sports fans, attorneys, and every walk of life has been or is currently represented here.  Maybe we&#039;re wrong for not trying to appeal to a specific demographic, but we don&#039;t care.  This isn&#039;t a million dollar operation, it&#039;s a site where people hang out and chat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it did make sense, it just no longer works for us.  When WNYM began, there were a total of 12-15 active blogs in Buffalo.  BRO was not yet online and many of the local bloggers decided there was value in maintaining their individual sites on a shared host and domain.  With one repository for information, it was easier for a new reader to discover a plethora of voices in one place and the writers were able to maintain their virtual identities.</p>
<p>With the exception of a few (Punaro, Kelly, Erin) most writers hopped onboard with the concept.  Over time, many of those blogs fizzled out (as most blogs do) and there was an explosion in the local blog scene.  The value proposition of a local &#8220;independent blog hub&#8221; lost some of its luster and we didn&#8217;t spend enough time tending our own garden to recruit and develop new writers.  We value independence of thought and wanted to avoid the stilted groupthink that inevitably develops on editorially centralized sites like BlogTO and BRO.</p>
<p>We thought we had a model that worked for us and it still does, we&#8217;re just making an adjustment to it.  Each writer will still have their own page, but publication of articles to the frontpage of the portal will be simplified and we&#8217;ll be better able to drive a unified portal on which readers can discover new content.  We&#8217;ll also be more agile when it comes to adding writers who don&#8217;t care about a personal blog page and simply wish to contribute articles on issues in which they hold some sort of expertise.  I think what we&#8217;re trying to do here is similar to &#8220;group placeblogs&#8221; but with a small twist.</p>
<p>As to giving a blog page to &#8220;anyone who wants one&#8221;, well, every blog has an audience.  No matter how vapid or amateurish you may find some of our current and past bloggers, they all find their own audience.  You might not like the way they write or what they have to say, but the site looks like Buffalo.  Suburbanites, urbanites, businespeople, blue collar workers, politicians, government employees, students, sports fans, attorneys, and every walk of life has been or is currently represented here.  Maybe we&#8217;re wrong for not trying to appeal to a specific demographic, but we don&#8217;t care.  This isn&#8217;t a million dollar operation, it&#8217;s a site where people hang out and chat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MediaWatcher</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/smith/2008/01/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/comment-page-1/#comment-4993</link>
		<dc:creator>MediaWatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 03:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalogeek.wnymedia.net/blogs/2008/01/29/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/#comment-4993</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re proposed approach certainly makes sense; indeed, that&#039;s a reason why it&#039;s used all over the place.  The separate sites spread across subdomains made little sense.  And giving a blog page to everyone who asks is questionable, really.  Unless you&#039;re trying to be some kind of small-time local hosting company or a regional blogger, I don&#039;t know why you&#039;d give everyone a page on this &#039;network&#039; as they add no value - and by adding no value, they actually subtract value by posting junk to their site.

That said, I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d use this &#039;idea&#039; as a way of validating anybody&#039;s insight since it&#039;s 99% of other blog sites work including those in your space - Buffalorising.com in particular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re proposed approach certainly makes sense; indeed, that&#8217;s a reason why it&#8217;s used all over the place.  The separate sites spread across subdomains made little sense.  And giving a blog page to everyone who asks is questionable, really.  Unless you&#8217;re trying to be some kind of small-time local hosting company or a regional blogger, I don&#8217;t know why you&#8217;d give everyone a page on this &#8216;network&#8217; as they add no value &#8211; and by adding no value, they actually subtract value by posting junk to their site.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d use this &#8216;idea&#8217; as a way of validating anybody&#8217;s insight since it&#8217;s 99% of other blog sites work including those in your space &#8211; Buffalorising.com in particular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek J. Punaro</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/smith/2008/01/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/comment-page-1/#comment-4996</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek J. Punaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalogeek.wnymedia.net/blogs/2008/01/29/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/#comment-4996</guid>
		<description>To be honest, for those of us that consume content via RSS it wouldn&#039;t make a huge difference, other than there&#039;d be a lot less individual feeds to subscribe to.  Where it does make a difference is that when the content picks up, it can become overwhelming.  With individual blogs, I&#039;m more likely to check out a few I read frequently, and push others aside until later.  But often with blogs like BRO, if there are too many unread items in their feed, I&#039;ll quickly scan the headlines and then mark the whole thing as read.

For the surfers, they&#039;ll feel like they&#039;re losing the individual voices, which may be similar to what it was like when WNYM went single theme.  I could see some backlash against that.  Most of the time I don&#039;t see/care who wrote an article on BRO, I treat it as a single voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, for those of us that consume content via RSS it wouldn&#8217;t make a huge difference, other than there&#8217;d be a lot less individual feeds to subscribe to.  Where it does make a difference is that when the content picks up, it can become overwhelming.  With individual blogs, I&#8217;m more likely to check out a few I read frequently, and push others aside until later.  But often with blogs like BRO, if there are too many unread items in their feed, I&#8217;ll quickly scan the headlines and then mark the whole thing as read.</p>
<p>For the surfers, they&#8217;ll feel like they&#8217;re losing the individual voices, which may be similar to what it was like when WNYM went single theme.  I could see some backlash against that.  Most of the time I don&#8217;t see/care who wrote an article on BRO, I treat it as a single voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Smith</title>
		<link>http://wnymedia.net/wnymedia/smith/2008/01/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/comment-page-1/#comment-4995</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalogeek.wnymedia.net/blogs/2008/01/29/a-new-chapter-for-buffalogeek/#comment-4995</guid>
		<description>Actually, yes, it would be similar in some ways to BRO.  In the sense that they enlist people to make smaller contributions rather than carry their own individual site.  Lots of new media sites function like that and I&#039;d like to do it and put our own spin on it.  Thanks for the feedback on the frontpage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, yes, it would be similar in some ways to BRO.  In the sense that they enlist people to make smaller contributions rather than carry their own individual site.  Lots of new media sites function like that and I&#8217;d like to do it and put our own spin on it.  Thanks for the feedback on the frontpage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
