GOP House leaders discussing changing rules on removing speaker

(NewsNation) — Republican leaders in the House are having an ongoing discussion about possibly changing the requirements for removing the speaker from power, a source confirmed to NewsNation on Thursday.

The discussions involve making it so one person alone could no longer trigger a vote to oust a speaker. At this point, such a change is just being floated preliminarily, and no final decisions have been made yet, the source told NewsNation.

The discussions come as House Speaker Mike Johnson’s position is under threat by Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga. and Thomas Massie, R-Ky. Both want Johnson to back down on funding for Ukraine. A motion to vacate resolution, as it’s known, was filed by Greene last month, the Associated Press reported, and Massie told colleagues he will co-sponsor the effort.

Neither lawmaker has said when a vote on Johnson’s removal could come to the floor.

Johnson on Tuesday criticized the efforts to oust him as “absurd.”

“It is not helpful to the cause, it is not helpful to the country, it does not help the House Republicans advance our agenda which is in the best interest of the American people here — a secure border, sound governance — and it’s not helpful to the unity that we have in the body,” Johnson said at a news conference where he stressed he is not resigning.

While voting Johnson out as speaker would be a rare move by historical standards, it would be the second time in the past year to happen. His predecessor, former Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., was voted out of the speakership last year in an effort orchestrated by Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida.

On Thursday, Johnson held firm on his decision to support a foreign aid package that would include about $61 billion for Ukraine. Some conservatives, though, have been opposed to sending more financial assistance to Ukraine, arguing that the United States should be focusing on its own problems, particularly, security at the U.S.-Mexico border.

Johnson, though, has said the threat of Russian President Vladimir Putin winning the war against Ukraine and taking on other NATO allies next is a risk that can’t be taken.

“This is not a game, it’s not a joke. We can’t play politics of this, we have to do the right thing and I’m going to allow an opportunity for every single member of the House to vote their conscience and their will on this,” he said.

The Hill reported that Johnson said he plans to move a separate border bill as the House considers foreign aid measures.

Greene called this “theatrics.”

“It’s the shiny object for Republicans that are saying we got to do something for the border,” she said.

While the House is expected to vote on this border bill in coming days, it will likely still face a dead end in the Senate, as many of its provisions are nonstarters among Democrats.

NewsNation reporter Evan Lambert, digital producer Devan Markham and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Related articles

Stevens to El-Sayed: ‘Thank you for clarifying that you didn’t call me an ogre’

The two faced off in the final Michigan Democratic primary debate hours after POLITICO published a leaked recording of El-Sayed.

Red flags fly as ‘very suspicious’ move from Todd Blanche has confirmation in doubt



CNN analyst Andrew McCabe on Tuesday pointed out that the Department of Justice never responded to President Donald Trump's IRS lawsuit — and how that could impact Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche's nomination.

The former deputy director of the FBI told CNN anchor Kasie Hunt that, as Blanche's nomination remains in limbo ahead of Thursday's vote, further questions about Trump's former personal attorney have come to light.

"Let's remember, there essentially was never really a true lawsuit here," McCabe said. "The president sued the IRS for $10 billion. The Department of Justice never even answered the complaint. So, there were never two opposing parties. The Justice Department never stood up and defended the United States in the way that it did in every other suit brought by the same leak from the same person."

This was unusual, McCabe explained.

"And because of that oddity, that's a very suspicious decision on the part of people like Todd Blanche and others," he said. "The lack of a true controversy meant that the entire thing was about to get dismissed. Before that could happen, they entered into these agreements. One of them, of course, created the weaponization fund, and the second one essentially granted complete immunity forever to Donald Trump, his family members and businesses."

McCabe described the situation further.

"It was basically a giveaway from the Department of Justice to the president," McCabe said. "How this thing stands or was ever conceived — I have no idea. I've been around many, many settlements of criminal matters, some of which involved IRS criminal matters, and have never seen any language like this. I think it's absolutely unprecedented and an incredibly bad idea."

The IRS settlement became a sticking point for some Republican senators during Blanche's confirmation hearing. On Tuesday, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) said there is no deal on Blanche's confirmation because of the settlement and the so-called anti-weaponization fund, Politico reported.

Slightly Stoopid @ Outer Harbor Terminal B

Photos from the latest show by Buffalo.FM Always share...