Raw Story

Featured Stories:

BUFFALO’S “OTHER” BIG SPORTS STORY

World Series hero Trey Yesavage pitches in Buffalo on...

Trump’s ‘revenge’ meltdown plans leak for White House Correspondents’ Dinner: report



President Donald Trump is preparing to throw a scripted tantrum at the White House Correspondents' Dinner this year, reported The Daily Beast on Wednesday.

"Donald Trump will launch a 'revenge' attack on the White House media when he confronts them in person at a Washington dinner on Saturday night — then flee before there can be revenge," said the report. "He is expected to target publications that he has accused of writing negatively about his administration and his war with Iran, in particular, according to sources."

This would track with his recent rants on Truth Social, where he has accused of the media of rigging reports about the Iran war to make it look like it's going worse than it actually is.

After he is done with his speech, said the report, he is skipping on the rest of the ceremony — in large part because he doesn't want to stick around for an award being given to a story that revealed his closeness to deceased financier and accused child trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

"Trump will leave the White House Correspondents’ Association event after making his speech, so he will miss the presentation of press awards — one of which would be certain to embarrass him," said the report. "He has told aides he has no intention of still being in the International Ballroom at the Washington Hilton when the Wall Street Journal is honored with the Katherine Graham award for its scoop about a bawdy letter Trump allegedly wrote for Jeffrey Epstein’s 50th birthday card."

The president sued WSJ over that reporting, alleging that the birthday letter was not authentic. This month, a federal judge tossed out that suit.

‘Massive cover up’ fears raised as House panel splits on clemency for Ghislaine Maxwell



Ghislaine Maxwell's condition to testify under oath — but only under the condition of clemency — has split House Oversight and Government Reform Committee members over whether President Donald Trump should grant her that pardon, Rep. James Comer (R-KY) told Politico on Wednesday.

Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's co-conspirator, was deposed by the committee and invoked her Fifth Amendment right to decline to answer the group's questions. Trump is the only one with the power to pardon her, something he has not yet ruled out.

Comer told Politico that he did not favor a pardon for Maxwell, a former confidant to the late financier and convicted child sex offender. When asked whether striking a deal with Maxwell could provide useful testimony, Comer did not share who on the panel supported granting her clemency.

"A lot of people do," Comer said.

"My committee’s split on that," Comer said. "I don’t speak for my committee."

"I think it looks bad," he added. "Honestly, other than Epstein, the worst person in this whole investigation is Maxwell."

Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) said that Democrats on the committee collectively oppose a pardon for Maxwell.

"That would be a huge step backwards, and, quite frankly, so disrespectful to the survivors," he said in an interview. "She is a known abuser. She is a known liar."

"If the DOJ or Oversight Republicans are out there trying to negotiate some sort of pardon that is... not only a huge slap in the face to this investigation, to anyone, to the American public," Garcia said. "It’s a part of a massive cover up."

‘Wah, wah, wah:’ AOC scoffs at GOP whining over gerrymandering



WASHINGTON — Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-NY, had strong words for Republicans complaining about the gerrymandering in Virginia that voters approved on Tuesday, with strong support from her party.

"Wah, wah, wah," Ocasio-Cortez told Raw Story on Wednesday, mimicking a whining baby and laughing in response to a question from reporter Matt Laslo. "Democrats have attempted and asked Republicans for 10 years to ban partisan gerrymandering, and for 10 years, Republicans have said, 'no.'"

Laslo was asking Ocasio-Cortez to respond to complaints from the GOP that it would be unconstitutional for Democrats to have a 10-1 congressional majority in Virginia, which the gerrymandering ballot measure would make possible. A Virginia circuit court judge blocked the vote-approved redistricting on Wednesday, however.

Still, Ocasio-Cortez saw no problem with Democrats supporting gerrymandering after years of opposing it when done on the Republican side. For AOC, the GOP "wanted to start this," and the Democrats are just fighting back.

"What they're mad at is they're accustomed to a Democrat Party that rolls over, doesn't fight and takes everything sitting down," Ocasio-Cortez said. "What they're mad at right now is that we are here in a new day."

She mentioned Republican gerrymandering in North Carolina and Texas, where Democrats lost seats. Trump's call for Texas Republicans to gerrymander arguably kicked off what's now seen as a redistricting arms race.

"We have been asking the Democratic Party to stand up and fight, and now they did," AOC continued. "Now the Republican Party doesn't like the fact that they are fighting against someone who actually will stand up for the American people."

Ocasio-Cortez said she would "welcome" working with the Republicans to pass a ban on partisan gerrymandering.

"We have the bill right here to end this all today," she said, smiling. "But they don't want to because they like pursuing and continuing to enact an unfair electoral landscape."

‘I don’t know where to begin!’ Morning Joe angrily shreds JD Vance’s diplomatic blunder



Vice President J.D. Vance's casual dismissal of the United Kingdom during an interview on Fox News on Monday night led to a furious tirade from MSNBC's Joe Scarborough on Tuesday morning.

Speaking with host Sean Hannity, Vance downplayed Britain's support for Ukraine and President Volodymyr Zelensky as "some random country that hasn't fought a war in 30 or 40 years"

After sharing the clip, the "Morning Joe" host launched into a brutal tirade aimed at the VP, who has been heavily criticized for his sneering attack on Zelensky in the Oval Office last Friday that shocked the world.

ALSO READ:'Absolutely unconscionable': Ex-Republican demands Trump removed from office after fight

"We can do fact checks," the MSNBC host blurted. "And this 'random country,' Great Britain, the country, we have a special relationship."

''Some random country,'" he repeated. "Well, here's a list of recent wars that that random country fought alongside with the United States: in 1990, the Gulf war, the British lost 47 lives. 1992, the Bosnian war –– 59 British personnel died. 1998 the Kosovo war, they fought alongside of us and 72 Brits killed. 2000, the Sierra Leone civil war, two personnel died. 2000 war, 2001 the war i Afghanistan, 457 British personnel lost their lives. 2003 the Iraq war 179 Brits lost their lives, 136 killed in hostile incidents."

"And then you go on and you see that the overall war on terror was proportionately 12 percent deadlier for the United Kingdom than it was for Americans, based on the number of troops deployed and the number of troops killed," he detailed. "Three times the number of British troops were shot and killed in Afghanistan than they were in Iraq, and a UK soldier was twice as likely to be shot and killed than their U.S. counterpart."

The exasperated Scarborough then blurted, "I don't know where to begin."

You can watch below or at the link.

- YouTube youtu.be

‘Can’t guarantee anything:’ GOP lawmaker won’t rule out cuts to veterans benefits and care



A top Republican on the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs put U.S. military veterans on notice that their benefits and care may not be safe as President Donald Trump continues to steamroll massive funding cuts throughout the federal government.

The acknowledgment came Monday as Rep. Greg Murphy (R-NC) refused to rule out on CNN’s “News Central” if Trump and his new Department of Government Efficiency could come after funding for veterans. Murphy was asked point-blank if some of the “pain” he said comes with restructuring a federal agency would affect veterans.

“Can you guarantee that veterans benefits and care will not be affected by these cuts?” CNN host Brianna Keilar asked.

“No, I can't guarantee anything,” Murphy responded. “But the whole purpose, again, of restructuring is to make sure that that agency is efficient.”

The North Carolina Republican, who sits on the veterans affairs committee, then attempted to make clear his position on veterans issues before launching into a critical attack of the government department whose job it is to administer benefit programs for military veterans, their families and survivors.

“Look, I care for our veterans,” Murphy said. “One out of 10 constituents of mine are veterans. “It’s a real issue in eastern North Carolina.”

ALSO READ: ‘Rookie error’: Senior Republicans urge new members to stop doing town halls

“But the real issue is also when somebody can't get benefits, and they're put off their doctor's appointments for 8 or 10 months when they can't get care,” he added. “That is where an agency has failed. We’re trying to get an agency that actually works for the people, that is supposed to be taken care of.”

The comments came as Murphy told viewers that he recognizes the public is “of course, up in arms because they don't want their issue or their particular agency, you know, dealt with.”

“But this is a national emergency to try to get our finances under control,” he said, adding that “the V.A. was mismanaged.”

The CNN host pointed out that veterans are already seeing hits to their care. Keilar told Murphy that support staff “crucial to the veterans crisis line” have been affected by the hiring freeze, in addition to personnel cuts to employees processing disability evaluations, which she added is leading to issues with understaffing.

Murphy's home state of North Carolina is home to the sprawling Marine Corps Base Camp Lejune.

Watch the clip below or at this link:

‘U.S. will walk’: Mike Flynn says NATO ‘a thing of the past’ as he calls to embrace Putin



Former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn called NATO "a thing of the past" and suggested the United States should walk away from the military alliance as President Trump pulls Russian President Vladimir Putin closer.

During a Monday interview with Real America's Voice, Flynn argued to Eric Bolling that Putin would use nuclear force against Europe "if Russia feels threatened, you know, on their sovereign territory."

"And if Europe all of a sudden starts to do things that look as though they're going to take on his sovereignty, I mean, I'm just telling you that really, really dangerous times, and this is why we need, you know, cool heads to prevail," he said.

"Should we basically exit NATO?" Bolling wondered.

"Yeah, I think what Trump needs to do is he needs to put on the table that the United States will walk away from NATO if the Europeans don't understand what is at stake here," Flynn replied. "You know, maybe the usefulness and the utility of NATO has, you know, sort of spent its full amount of whatever, energy, right, I mean, at this point in time, but NATO may be a thing of the past, and there may be—may need to be a new security architecture."

Trump's former national security advisor also argued that the current president should have a closer relationship with Putin.

"It needs to be very professional," he remarked. "We're talking about two of the largest nuclear weapons holders on the planet, two great nations, you know, historically, culturally, and I think that what he's going to have to do, as he's done, you know, Joe Biden never called Putin once, not once."

ALSO READ: 'Absolutely unconscionable': Ex-Republican demands Trump removed from office after fight

"At least Trump needs to open up that relationship by talking, you know, when you're—at least when you're talking, you can talk about how do we achieve peace," Flynn added. "You know, we have to fight for peace as hard as we have to fight in war, and that is what President Donald J. Trump is trying to do."

Trump has reportedly tried to find a place for Flynn in his new administration.

Watch the video below from Real America's Voice.

Any Democrat who’s not fighting right now needs to get the hell out of our way



It was late-fall of 2015, and the end of an era. Our latest troubles as the world’s most enduring democracy were finally behind us, and endless possibilities lit up the road ahead.

I’d argue it was the most unappreciated and significant moment in modern American politics.

The Barack Obama Administration was in full wind-down mode after seven of the most influential years of governance in our nation’s history. The Great Recession was yesterday’s terrible news, and the criminal War in Iraq had been reduced to another ugly red, white, and blue stain that we’ll never be able to scrub out of America’s fading fabric.

Obama had delivered peace and prosperity, after George W. Bush’s eight years of war and economic collapse.

As the 2016 election started coming into view, there was a real feeling in the air that maybe, just maybe, a blissfully bored America was ready for something new — or at the very least, a tuneup of some of the important social issues that Obama had built into America’s engine.

Thanks in large part to the Supreme Court’s wretched Citizens United decision, and a Republican Party that was quietly taking over all our courts, it was apparent that there was gobs of money everywhere except where it should be: in the hands of the American people. Our deep-pocketed politicians, their bloated political parties, and all those damned consolidated banks and corporations had stolen too much cash and power, and needed to be slapped back but quick.

It was finally time to do something to level the playing field and even the score. It was finally time for an adjustment and a new way to conduct America’s business.

During this sliver of time just nine, short years ago, everything seemed possible. America wasn’t so much divided by parties as it was class. Too few had too much.

The time was right to return power to we, the people.

Maybe it was naivety, or maybe it really was legitimate hope, but my only overriding wish heading into the 2016 presidential election was that it featured a race with fresh faces and political ideas, and anybody BUT another Bush or Clinton.

I know, I know …

I supported Bernie Sanders at the time, and will go to my grave believing he would have beaten Trump. There was an energy to his campaign that was driven by people who had traditionally been cast aside by the two major political parties, and were finally ready to reclaim their time.

Suddenly they had a voice, and fresh ideas for America’s way forward. Was it smoke and mirrors? Maybe, but you couldn’t ignore the hope in the air, and at least the idea of new possibilities.

Out with the old, in with the new ...

When Sanders won big here in Wisconsin in the 2016 primary I thought we might be onto something. He was drawing huge crowds, and it was fun and exciting while it lasted.

Look, I am not here to re-litigate that awful election, I’m really not, people. I proudly voted for Hillary Clinton, and something inside me died forever when she lost to the terrible man on that unbearably cold November night.

The point of this walk down memory lane, is that I believe the majority of this country is very much still where we were preceding the blast in 2016. That moment never really went away, it just got buried under the rubble of the ongoing political storms we have found ourselves smack in the middle of ever since.

I also happen to believe we are better equipped for the fight we find ourselves in right now than we were back then, but more on that in a moment ...

Right now, thanks in large part to the billionaires and oligarchs we were warned about nine years ago, we are somehow into another Trump presidency. This time, though, the monster has truly been unleashed, and with the backing of fascists all over the globe, and a Republican Party of traitors, he aims to finish us off for good.

At the rate he and his boss, Elon Musk, are going, America will be an unrecognizable mess by this summer.

With that as a backdrop, we have never needed fighters on the Left more than we do now, yet somehow the Democratic Party seems to be fighting from the slop of some ditch, instead of from the high ground on the frontlines of the war for our survival.

It is appalling, and I for one have had enough of this cowardly s---.

Where are the leaders in the Democratic Party?

Why am I being assaulted by fundraising messages, when the people who want all this damn money have no damn plans to put down this attack?

It has gotten so bad that veteran Democratic “strategist” James Carville actually went out with a piece in The New York Times this week advocating that the party which has made him rich should do … are you ready for it? … absolutely nothing right now to combat the Republicans’ attack on everything good in America.

Here’s where I jump in real quick to admit that I mostly can’t stand Carville, or for that matter, most of these squishy political operatives, who always get paid no matter who wins. I generally had to wash my hands, and clean out my ears after talking to these people when I was a newspaperman.

Just so much bulls--- …

Carville got exactly ONE thing right 33 years ago — “it’s the economy, stupid” — and has been dining handsomely off it ever since. I had almost come to respect his decades-long grift, but it should be over for good after the slop he pitched in that damn NYT column.

There’s so much idiocy in it, it is hard to pinpoint where it completely hit rock bottom, but the thing that really lit me up was this bit taking aim at Democrats’ approach to stopping Trump and his subservient Republicans in 2018.

Get this:

“(Doing nothing right now) is a wiser approach than we pursued in the first Trump administration, when Democrats tried and failed at the art of resistance politics. We voiced outrage on social issue after social issue. We spun ourselves up in a tizzy over an investigation into Russia. We fought Mr. Trump at every corner, on every issue imaginable and muddied up our message in an unwinnable war. We were saved only by his lousy governing and a lot of effort on our side finding good candidates to run for the House and Senate in 2018. Sometimes the most powerful thing we can do is retreat on the immediate battlefield — and advance in another direction.”

You can keep re-reading that insulting crap until it makes sense, or you can stop listening to this complete idiot and the people like him in the Democratic Party, who still believe it is 1992.

By this fool’s telling, what we (The Resistance) did in 2018 was ineffective.

If rolling to massive victories in the House, giving Nancy Pelosi the Speaker’s job, winning myriad local, statewide races, and racking up key governor races across the country was a failure, I’d hate to hear this idiot’s definition of winning.

Worse yet for know-it-alls like Carville, Democrats reclaimed the White House and the U.S. Senate just two years later.

Oh, and that “tizzy” over Russia? Well, it turns we were exactly right about that, too.

On Friday alone, Trump and his sickly Vice President JD Vance officially surrendered to Putin as they tried to publicly embarrass Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

It was one of the most disgusting things I have ever witnessed.

Carville, and the people advocating for Democrats to do nothing right now can line up and kiss my ass.

We need fighters, not quitters.

To quote Zelenskyy, "We need ammunition, not a ride …"

We need to be messaging our collective asses off about the damage that billionaires like Musk and traitors like Trump are doing to this country at the behest of murdering dictators like Putin.

This message is ready-made and should be on full blast and repeat mode.

We are a country that is quickly receding, not ascending. We are weak, not strong. Prices are rising, not falling. We are bowing to dictators, instead of flattening them.

Give this a thought: If Putin had been officially elected President of the United States instead of Trump, would he be doing anything differently than what we are seeing right now?

How damn hard is this to understand?

We are very close to losing it all, so we better get our s--- together quick.

The good news is — hard as it is to see — is that thanks to that 2018 resistance effort that Carville hates so much, we are in better shape than we were in 2016 to fight this war. We have political infrastructure in place that we didn't have back then.

How many new people have you connected with across the globe since 2016 who care about the same things you do?

What we don’t have is enough political leaders who are stepping up to meet the moment, and for the life of me I just don’t get it.

So maybe it’s time for the people to lead. After all, that is the real idea of America.

And if the people lead, then maybe or so-called leaders will follow.

This was all in front of us in 2016, and I swear to you it is again.

So who’s with me?

NOW READ: Only a bully kicks a man and then makes him say 'thank you'

D. Earl Stephens is the author of “Toxic Tales: A Caustic Collection of Donald J. Trump’s Very Important Letters” and finished up a 30-year career in journalism as the Managing Editor of Stars and Stripes. You can find all his work here, and follow him on Bluesky here.

MTG’s reporter boyfriend claims ‘1000s of death threats’ after Zelensky wardrobe question



Pro-MAGA reporter Brian Glenn, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's (R-GA) boyfriend, claimed he received "thousands of death threats" after asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky about his wardrobe at an Oval Office meeting last week.

On Monday, Glenn reflected on the meaning behind Zelensky's decision not to wear a suit in his meeting with President Donald Trump.

"Why does this man continue to go see heads of nations get hundreds of billions of dollars, be in the highest offices around the world, and absolutely wear that silly little green jumpsuit, which you're not currently in the war in that country," Glenn said on Real America's Voice. "Why can't you show some respect and dress up and be in the highest level?"

"Sometimes you can judge a book by its cover and by him not showing respect," he continued. "And obviously, the wardrobe reflected his attitude, which we later found out about six and a half minutes after that question."

"That's when things got heated up. So it was a reflection of his genuine disrespect he has for this country."

ALSO READ: 'Absolutely unconscionable': Ex-Republican demands Trump removed from office after fight

Glenn said the question had taken a toll on his personal life.

"The feedback that I have personally gotten from, I would consider, America first people, the base, has been huge," he revealed. "But I've received thousands of death threats."

"I currently have a police unit at my house in Texas because they're saying that they're going to find me and harm me and things like that," he added. "So it has been a very serious issue."

Watch the video below or at this link.

‘Paid troublemakers’: Trump alarmed by ruckus at GOP town halls after first-month chaos



President Donald Trump took notice of the ruckus at Republican town hall events after his first month in office was marked by chaos.

The president spoke out about the town halls in a Monday post on his Truth Social platform.

"Paid 'troublemakers' are attending Republican Town Hall Meetings. It is all part of the game for the Democrats, but just like our big LANDSLIDE ELECTION, it's not going to work for them!" Trump wrote.

NBC News reported that Republicans had largely canceled town hall meets amid fear of blowback from Trump's actions.

"A Republican lawmaker who spoke to NBC News on the condition of anonymity to avoid publicly divulging internal party strategy, said that the RNC has been helpful in making suggestions about how House Republicans can handle the situation but that it stopped short of trying to impose an impossible-to-enforce moratorium," NBC said.

ALSO READ: 'Absolutely unconscionable': Ex-Republican demands Trump removed from office after fight

One Republican senator who went through with a town hall was swamped by people mad at Trump.

Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) quickly ended the town hall event last week after he experienced a wave of backlash over Trump's DOGE-related cuts.

Popular articles

BUFFALO’S “OTHER” BIG SPORTS STORY

World Series hero Trey Yesavage pitches in Buffalo on...

Trump’s ‘revenge’ meltdown plans leak for White House Correspondents’ Dinner: report



President Donald Trump is preparing to throw a scripted tantrum at the White House Correspondents' Dinner this year, reported The Daily Beast on Wednesday.

"Donald Trump will launch a 'revenge' attack on the White House media when he confronts them in person at a Washington dinner on Saturday night — then flee before there can be revenge," said the report. "He is expected to target publications that he has accused of writing negatively about his administration and his war with Iran, in particular, according to sources."

This would track with his recent rants on Truth Social, where he has accused of the media of rigging reports about the Iran war to make it look like it's going worse than it actually is.

After he is done with his speech, said the report, he is skipping on the rest of the ceremony — in large part because he doesn't want to stick around for an award being given to a story that revealed his closeness to deceased financier and accused child trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

"Trump will leave the White House Correspondents’ Association event after making his speech, so he will miss the presentation of press awards — one of which would be certain to embarrass him," said the report. "He has told aides he has no intention of still being in the International Ballroom at the Washington Hilton when the Wall Street Journal is honored with the Katherine Graham award for its scoop about a bawdy letter Trump allegedly wrote for Jeffrey Epstein’s 50th birthday card."

The president sued WSJ over that reporting, alleging that the birthday letter was not authentic. This month, a federal judge tossed out that suit.

‘Massive cover up’ fears raised as House panel splits on clemency for Ghislaine Maxwell



Ghislaine Maxwell's condition to testify under oath — but only under the condition of clemency — has split House Oversight and Government Reform Committee members over whether President Donald Trump should grant her that pardon, Rep. James Comer (R-KY) told Politico on Wednesday.

Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's co-conspirator, was deposed by the committee and invoked her Fifth Amendment right to decline to answer the group's questions. Trump is the only one with the power to pardon her, something he has not yet ruled out.

Comer told Politico that he did not favor a pardon for Maxwell, a former confidant to the late financier and convicted child sex offender. When asked whether striking a deal with Maxwell could provide useful testimony, Comer did not share who on the panel supported granting her clemency.

"A lot of people do," Comer said.

"My committee’s split on that," Comer said. "I don’t speak for my committee."

"I think it looks bad," he added. "Honestly, other than Epstein, the worst person in this whole investigation is Maxwell."

Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) said that Democrats on the committee collectively oppose a pardon for Maxwell.

"That would be a huge step backwards, and, quite frankly, so disrespectful to the survivors," he said in an interview. "She is a known abuser. She is a known liar."

"If the DOJ or Oversight Republicans are out there trying to negotiate some sort of pardon that is... not only a huge slap in the face to this investigation, to anyone, to the American public," Garcia said. "It’s a part of a massive cover up."

‘Wah, wah, wah:’ AOC scoffs at GOP whining over gerrymandering



WASHINGTON — Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-NY, had strong words for Republicans complaining about the gerrymandering in Virginia that voters approved on Tuesday, with strong support from her party.

"Wah, wah, wah," Ocasio-Cortez told Raw Story on Wednesday, mimicking a whining baby and laughing in response to a question from reporter Matt Laslo. "Democrats have attempted and asked Republicans for 10 years to ban partisan gerrymandering, and for 10 years, Republicans have said, 'no.'"

Laslo was asking Ocasio-Cortez to respond to complaints from the GOP that it would be unconstitutional for Democrats to have a 10-1 congressional majority in Virginia, which the gerrymandering ballot measure would make possible. A Virginia circuit court judge blocked the vote-approved redistricting on Wednesday, however.

Still, Ocasio-Cortez saw no problem with Democrats supporting gerrymandering after years of opposing it when done on the Republican side. For AOC, the GOP "wanted to start this," and the Democrats are just fighting back.

"What they're mad at is they're accustomed to a Democrat Party that rolls over, doesn't fight and takes everything sitting down," Ocasio-Cortez said. "What they're mad at right now is that we are here in a new day."

She mentioned Republican gerrymandering in North Carolina and Texas, where Democrats lost seats. Trump's call for Texas Republicans to gerrymander arguably kicked off what's now seen as a redistricting arms race.

"We have been asking the Democratic Party to stand up and fight, and now they did," AOC continued. "Now the Republican Party doesn't like the fact that they are fighting against someone who actually will stand up for the American people."

Ocasio-Cortez said she would "welcome" working with the Republicans to pass a ban on partisan gerrymandering.

"We have the bill right here to end this all today," she said, smiling. "But they don't want to because they like pursuing and continuing to enact an unfair electoral landscape."

Niagara Pride to Host 5th Annual WNY Pride 5K & Wellness Event

Sets $75,000 Goal for Mobile Pride Unit SANBORN, NY –...