Eric Adams Confronted About Comment Blasting ‘All These Negroes’ Calling on Him to Quit In Tense Interview
New York City Mayor Eric Adams (D) was confronted during a recent TV interview about his comments blasting "all these negroes" calling on him to resign.
The post Eric Adams Confronted About Comment Blasting ‘All These Negroes’ Calling on Him to Quit In Tense Interview first appeared on Mediaite.Michelle Trachtenberg, ‘Gossip Girl’ and ‘Buffy’ actress, dead at 39
Stephen A. Smith Roasts ‘Moribund’ and ‘Pathetic’ NY Giants Amid Reports Team Could Land QB Matthew Stafford: ‘It’s a Swamp!’
Stephen A. Smith on Wednesday used a discussion about the future of quarterback Matthew Stafford to brutally tear into the New York Giants.
The post Stephen A. Smith Roasts ‘Moribund’ and ‘Pathetic’ NY Giants Amid Reports Team Could Land QB Matthew Stafford: ‘It’s a Swamp!’ first appeared on Mediaite.Trump pushes DOGE, tariffs at first Cabinet meeting
The Supreme Court is in “radical agreement” that a bizarre DEI rule needs to go
BIG: Federal Board Agrees With OSC Order to Halt Firings
Hochul wants ban on tax breaks for data centers
State releases new data and infographics tracking investments in mental health under Hochul plan
‘Slave tourism’ argument in Trump-friendly SCOTUS brief flagged by legal expert

A law professor flagged a legal theory from a Trump amicus brief that he says would let foreigners bring enslaved people into the U.S.
During an interview on the Legal AF podcast, legal expert Paul Gowder talked about American legal scholar Richard Epstein and an argument he made in an amicus brief filed in Trump's birthright citizenship case. Earlier this month, the Supreme Court ruled against Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship, and Epstein filed the brief on Trump's side.
Gowder explained that Epstein argued that the phrases "subject to the jurisdiction" and "within the jurisdiction" have different meanings in the Constitution. Epstein observed that the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction" is used in the 14th Amendment, which guarantees birthright citizenship, and the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery.
Epstein interprets that to mean that those two amendments can only apply to people who are members of society in the United States, or "subject" to the jurisdiction, not simply within it, according to Gowder.
"Richard Epstein wants to read 'subject to the jurisdiction' to mean like in more control of the U.S., basically a member of the U.S. community, not somebody who's just passing through," Gowder explained.
That would allow Epstein to argue, "We can read the 14th Amendment to exclude tourists and to exclude undocumented people," Gowder said. But with slavery and the 13th Amendment, "he just, like, embraces the notion that therefore the 13th Amendment must mean that if somebody from a country that has legal slavery comes to the U.S. as a tourist, they can bring their slaves with them," Gowder explained.
"Like, what?" Gowder said in dismay as he described Epstein's idea as "slave tourism."
Gowder stressed that Epstein isn't a fringe legal scholar and described him as a "very, very famous NYU law professor, worshipped by the [Federalist Society], like basically, for a certain kind of right-wing thinker, people on the right often think he's like the greatest legal mind of his generation."
However, for Gowder, Epstein is "completely nuts."
Supreme Court Screwed as Nation Demands Reform Now! by Legal AF
Read on Substack
