Foot Dragging Holding Up $58 Million High Speed Rail Project

U.S. Senator Charles E. Schumer called on CSX, Amtrak, the state Department of Transportation and Federal Railway Administration to quickly complete a plan for the construction of the high speed rail line from Buffalo to Albany that is set to begin in Genesee County. Schumer helped secure $58 million in federal funds to construct the first part of the high speed rail line in Western New York, but the money cannot begin flowing to the project until the parties complete service, construction, and maintenance agreements. With the House of Representatives already having voted several times to rescind high speed rail money, Schumer will push the parties to move quickly so that New York’s share of high-speed rail funding is not stripped before construction can begin. Schumer, a strong proponent of high-speed rail in Upstate New York, believes the rail link between Buffalo and Albany will be a huge benefit to residents and businesses throughout the state, and that the construction project could create hundreds of jobs over the next several years.

“High speed rail is going to usher in a new era of economic growth throughout Upstate New York, and that project is going to start right here in Genesee County,” said Schumer. “But for too long, this project has been stuck at the station and hasn’t been rolling down the tracks. We need to get moving, and get moving now. CSX, Amtrak, the state and the feds need to get together and come up with all of the necessary agreements so that we can sound the whistle and get this project going. The funds are there, the will is there, and the plan is there – let’s end this needless delay and put shovels in the ground so we can start on the first phase of this job creating work.”

Schumer was joined by local officials from the town of Bergen, Genesee County, Bruce Becker from the Empire State Passenger Rail Association and Miller’s Millwork owner and Bergen Councilmember Barry Miller as he announced his push to get the high speed rail construction project underway. In 2010, Schumer helped secure $58 million in funds for the first phase of the rail project that will eventually connect Buffalo and Albany with tracks capable of handling train speeds of 110 miles per hour. However, in order for New York State to utilize the funds for construction, NYSDOT, the Federal Railway Administration, CSX, and Amtrak must come to a number of agreements. CSX must finalize a Service Outcomes Agreement with New York State that specifies how the federal funds will be applied to ensure that the work improves passenger rail service, not simply freight rail. The agreement will address train speeds, and will ensure that the rail work leads to reductions in passenger rail delays. The two must also agree on a construction and maintenance agreement, and the state must finish its engineering and scoping work.

Schumer successfully pushed these parties to reach similar agreements on other projects throughout the state last fall. As a result of his efforts, $150 million in high-speed rail funds reached their intended projects last September, which will put people to work in the Capital Region and Hudson Valley building new track and making critical signal improvements. The $58M will be used to start building the first 11 miles of the actual high speed rail on which the passenger trains will run on.  Currently, Amtrak passenger trains must use CSX’s single set of freight tracks which leads to crowded lines and frequent delays.  These freight tracks are among the busiest of CSX’s route system and typically carry as many as 60 trains per day. Amtrak passenger trains take a back seat to this freight traffic and often have to pull over on sidings and wait for long periods of time in order to allow freight traffic through. This causes Amtrak riders delays, yields poor on-time performance, and provides passengers will little assurance that they will get to their destination on time.

Schumer is pushing the construction forward in order to give Amtrak trains the opportunity to increase top speed from 79 to 110 miles per hour, and to eliminate interference from CSX freight trains so that passengers will not be subject to needless delays and can count on having their train arrive on time. The construction will also be a benefit to CSX which will have full use of their tracks, and will not have to compete for track usage with Amtrak.  This is essential for manufacturers and employers who count on a good freight infrastructure to deliver their products and supplies.

Schumer noted that similar freight and passenger rail build outs are happening across the U.S. The nation’s other long haul freight carriers are completing these types of projects in other states. Specifically Union Pacific railroad in Illinois is onboard with running their freight trains next to rails carrying 110 mph passenger service.  Norfolk Southern Railroad is operating in a similar arrangement in North Carolina, Chicago, and Michigan as is BNSF Railway in California, Oregon, and Washington.

 

“New York can’t get left in the dust when it comes to high-speed rail,” continued Schumer. “We need to start laying track now, and don’t have another day to waste.”

 

A copy of Senator Schumer’s letter to CSX, NYSDOT, Amtrak, and the FRA appears below:

 

Dear Administrator Szabo, Commissioner McDonald, Mr. Boardman and Chairman Ward:

I write regarding funding for high speed rail projects in upstate New York for which money has not been obligated because final agreements that would allow these projects to move forward have not been reached.  I appreciate the hard work each of your organizations exerted last year in reaching an agreement to allow significant funds for high speed rail projects to be obligated in the Capitol region. In that spirit of compromise and collaboration, I urge you to work quickly to finalize the remaining agreements so that work can begin on these important projects.

Specifically, I urge the Federal Rail Administration (FRA), New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) and CSX Corporation to work together to finalize the necessary agreements and allow New York to utilize $58 million for new tracks in the Rochester region and $18.5 million for track construction and signal improvements in the Syracuse region.

As you know, there have been repeated attempts in this Congress to rescind transportation infrastructure funding which has not yet been obligated. I believe that such efforts are short sighted and undercut our efforts to put people back to work while laying the foundation for our communities and our economy to thrive and grow. I will continue to fight back against any attempts to rescind infrastructure funding but the only sure way to prevent this money from being rescinded is to obligate it.

I understand that the agreement reached by FRA, NYSDOT, Amtrak and CSX that allowed funds to be obligated for other New York projects last year was the product of much hard work and strong cooperation among all parties. I ask that you again come together and work quickly to finalize the necessary agreements to allow this money to be obligated.

Thank you for your continued attention to this important matter.  If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact my Washington, DC office at 202-224-6542.

 

Sincerely,

Senator Charles E. Schumer

 

Related articles

Seeing the National Guard on our streets is bad — but we must beware Trump’s Plan B



I saw some of my former Naval War College colleagues at the recent No Kings rally in Providence. Given that National Guard troops and protestors had clashed in Los Angeles at an earlier June rally protesting ICE raids, we wondered whether we would see National Guard troops as we marched, where they would be from, and their mission? We didn’t. That doesn’t mean, however, that there is no need for concern about the future.

The National Guard is unique to the U.S. military given it is under the authority of both state governors and the federal government and has both a domestic and federal mission. Governors can call up the National Guard when states have a crisis, either a natural disaster or a human-made one. Federal authorities can call on the National Guard for overseas deployment and to enforce federal law.

President Dwight Eisenhower used both federalized National Guard units and regular U.S. Army units to enforce desegregation laws in Arkansas in 1957. But using military troops to intimidate citizens and support partisan politics, especially by bringing National Guard units from other states has never been, and should never be, part of its mission.

But that’s what is happening now.

A host of Democratic U.S. senators, led by Dick Durbin of Illinois, ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Jack Reed of Rhode Island, ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, has called for an inquiry into the Trump administration’s recent domestic deployment of active-duty and National Guard troops to Chicago, Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., Portland, Oregon, and Memphis, Tennessee.

In an Oct. 17 letter to the Defense Department’s Inspector General, the senators challenge the legality of the domestic troop deployment and charge that it undermines military readiness and politicizes the nation’s military.

Ostensibly, the troops have been sent to cities “overrun” with crime. Yet data shows that has not been the case. Troops have been sent to largely Democratic-run cities in Democratic-led states.

The case for political theater being the real reason behind the deployment certainly was strengthened when largely Republican Mississippi sent troops to Washington D.C., even though crime in Mississippi cities like Jackson is higher than in D.C. Additionally, there is an even more dangerous purpose to the troop presence — that of normalizing the idea of troops on the streets, a key facet of authoritarian rule.

There are fundamental differences in training and mission between military troops and civilian law enforcement, with troop presence raising the potential for escalation and excessive force, and the erosion of both civil liberties and military readiness.

Troop deployments have hit some stumbling blocks. Judges, including those appointed by President Donald Trump, have in cases like Portland impeded administration attempts to send troops. Mayors and governors, including Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, have pushed back as well.

While the Trump administration has shown its willingness to ignore the law, it has also shown a significant ability to come up with a “Plan B.” In this case, Plan B, used by many past dictators, is likely the utilization of private military companies (PMC).

Countries have used these mercenary organizations to advance strategic goals abroad in many instances. Though the Wagner Group, fully funded by the Kremlin, was disbanded after a rebellion against the regular Russian military in 2023, Vladimir Putin continues to use PMCs to advance strategic goals in Ukraine and other regions of the world wrapped in a cloak of plausible deniability. Nigeria has used them internally to fight Boko Haram. The United States used Blackwater in Afghanistan in the early days after 9/11. Overall, the use of PMCs abroad is highly controversial as it involves complex tradeoffs between flexibility, expertise and need with considerable risks to accountability, ethics and long-term stability.

Domestically, the use of PMCs offer leaders facing unrest the advantage of creating and operating in legal “gray zones.” Leaders not confident of the loyalty of a country’s armed forces have resorted to these kinds of private armies. Adolf Hitler relied on his paramilitary storm troopers, or “brown shirts” to create and use violence and intimidation against Jews and perceived political opponents. Similarly, Benito Mussolini’s “black shirts,” Serbian paramilitaries, and PMCs in Muammar Gaddafi’s Libya served similar purposes.

President Donald Trump has said he is “open” to the idea of using PMCs to help deport undocumented immigrants. He has militarized Homeland Security agents to send to Portland, evidencing his willingness to circumvent legal challenges. And perhaps most glaringly, poorly qualified and trained masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents are already terrorizing American cities.

At the No Kings rally in Providence my former colleagues and I did see a man in an unfamiliar uniform — with a gun and handcuffs — standing alone on the sidewalk along the march path. He wasn’t doing anything threatening, just watching. In the past, he might not have even been noticed.

But that day he was. Some people even waved to him. Protestors are not yet intimidated, but they are wary, and rightfully so.

Be aware, America. They have a Plan B.

  • Joan Johnson-Freese of Newport is professor emeritus of national security affairs at the U.S. Naval War College and a Senior Fellow at Women in International Security. She earned a Ph.D. in international relations and affairs from Kent State University. She is an adjunct Government Department faculty member at Harvard Extension and Summer Schools, teaching courses on women, peace & security, grand strategy & U.S. national security and leadership. Her book, “Leadership in War & Peace: Masculine & Feminine,” was released in March 2025 from Routledge. Her website is joanjohnsonfreese.com.

Federal Prosecutors Suspended for Not Using MAGA-Approved Verbiage to Describe Jan 6

The Latest Whitewashing of Jan. 6 Since President Trump first came back to the White House, he has predictably taken...