Higgins Announces House Approval of Legislation to End the Government Shutdown

Congressman Brian Higgins (NY-26) announced the House of Representatives has approved bills aimed at ending the partial federal government shutdown. 

Higgins said, “This shutdown has been an unnecessary crisis manufactured by the President. Today the new Democratic House showed leadership in asserting its authority as an equal branch of government.  We hope the Senate joins us in standing up for federal workers and restoring an operational government for the people of this country.”

The House approved a legislative package, H.R. 21, which includes funding, through September 30, 2019, for five of the six areas impacted by the partial shutdown: Agriculture-Rural Development-Food and Drug Administration, Commerce-Justice-Science, Financial Services-General Government, Interior-Environment, Department of State-Foreign Operations, and Transportation-Housing and Urban Development.  The bill also includes pay for the 800,000 federal employees unable to work or working without pay since the shutdown on December 22, 2018.  

A separate resolution, H.J. Res 1, approved by the House provides continuing appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security through February 8, 2019 to allow for additional time for discussion between Congress and the Administration on border security. 

The legislation now moves to the Senate for a vote. 

Related articles

Poll: The battle for MAHA that could sway the midterms

A new POLITICO Poll finds cracks in the coalition that helped put HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and President Donald Trump in office.

MAGA county clerk will get new sentence in 2020 election plot



An appeals court tossed out a nine-year sentence for discredited Colorado election clerk Tina Peters.

The Donald Trump ally will be re-sentenced by a district court judge after the Colorado Court of Appeals upheld her conviction but found that Mesa County District Court Judge Matthew Barrett had wrongly based part of his sentence on Peters’ exercise of her right to free speech, reported the Denver Post.

“Notwithstanding the fact that some of the trial court’s considerations were tied to proper sentencing considerations, when the court’s comments are viewed in their totality, it is apparent that the court imposed the lengthy sentence it did because Peters continued to espouse the views that led her to commit these crimes,” the opinion states.

The "tenor" of Barrett's original sentencing order indicates that he "punished" Peters for her persistence in insisting the 2020 election had been fraudulent and that keeping her in prison was necessary to prevent her from espousing views the judge felt were "damaging," and the appeals court sent the case back to him for a resentencing.

The appellate court found there was sufficient evidence to convict Peters and that she was not immune to state prosecution, and the judges also found that a purported pardon from Trump carried no authority under Colorado law.

The court denied Peters' request that a new judge resentence her, saying that issue should be raised in a lower court, and ruled that a prosecutor’s description of her case during closing arguments had no impact on the verdict.

“The evidence of her knowledge of the illegality of her conduct is so overwhelming, we simply cannot say that the prosecutor’s statement (even if improper) had any impact on the verdict, let alone an impact so great as to cause serious doubt about the reliability of the judgment of conviction,” the panel found.

Peters, now 70, was convicted by a Mesa County jury of four felony and three misdemeanor crimes for plotting to sneak unauthorized individuals into a secure area to examine voting equipment to look for evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.