DEFENDANT CHARGED FOR ATTEMPTING TO ROB BANK THE DAY AFTER PLEADING GUILTY IN DOG DEATH

Erie County District Attorney John J. Flynn announces that 23-year-old Jarrod Dillman of Buffalo has been arraigned before Buffalo City Court Judge Amy Martoche on one count of Attempted Robbery in the Third Degree, a Class “E” felony, and one count of Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Seventh Degree, a Class “A” misdemeanor. The defendant was arraigned on Monday, November 11, 2019.

On November 6, 2019, Dillman pleaded guilty to one count of Aggravated Cruelty to Animals, a felony. The defendant admitted to causing the death of three-year-old Havanese mix on August 3, 2019 while working as a dog daycare attendant at a location on Niagara Street in the City of Buffalo. He was released on a $5,000 bond that had been posted in Buffalo City Court following his plea on the Aggravated Cruelty to Animals charge.

It is alleged that on the day following his plea, November 7, 2019, at approximately 2:29 p.m., Dillman entered the M&T Bank located on Elmwood Avenue near Breckenridge Street in the City of Buffalo. The defendant allegedly approached the teller with a forged check. He is accused of writing a note on the back of the check, which directed the teller to give him cash and to not to call the police. After the teller repeatedly stated “no,” the defendant left the bank.

When Buffalo Police officers arrested Dillman, he was allegedly found in possession of a small amount of crack cocaine.

Dillman is scheduled to return on Monday, December 16, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. for a felony hearing.

If convicted on all charges, Dillman faces a maximum sentence of 4 years in prison. Judge Martoche released the defendant on his own recognizance following his arraignment.

DA Flynn commends the Buffalo Police Department for their work in the investigation, including Detective/Sergeant Amy Frankel, Detective Zackary Burgess, Detective William Moretti, Officer Richard Cruz and Officer Elaina Perez.

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant District Attorney Erin E. Hart of the DA’s Felony Trials Bureau.

As are all persons accused of a crime, the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Related articles

Laughter erupts as James Comer blanks in House hearing: ‘I wasn’t paying attention’



A hearing room for the House Oversight Committee erupted into laughter Wednesday after the committee chair, Rep. James Comer (R-KY), blanked on a question asked by a Democratic committee member.

Wednesday’s hearing saw the committee fiercely debate whether to hold Bill and Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress for defying a congressional subpoena to testify about their connections to Jeffrey Epstein and his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell. Challenging the measure was Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-NM), who pressed Comer on whether the committee had already been informed that the Clintons were willing to testify on the record.

“It's my understanding that you guys have received correspondence by phone, email and a written letter from the attorneys from the Clintons offering to [testify] on the record, with you, with the staff... is that correct?” Stansbury asked.

“I didn't... I wasn't paying attention to your question,” Comer admitted, sparking an eruption of laughter in the room, including from Stansbury, who moved to ask her question again, albeit more slowly.

“Okay – we're pursuant to a motion you brought for contempt, and the claim is that you have made reasonable accommodations and that [the Clintons] have not been responsive,” Stansbury repeated.

“But they have transmitted correspondence to all of the members of the committee – including yourself – including a letter from their attorneys stating that they have offered by phone, by email to meet with you, on the record, to give sworn statements. Is that correct?”

Comer’s first reaction was to speak of how the Clintons had been given “five months” to appear before Congress before being pressed by Stansbury again: “yes or no,” she asked.

“You all are trying to create a false narrative!” Comer fired back. “You've had five months, you should have gotten to the Clintons before the contempt vote!”

Stansbury asked once more for Comer to answer her question, but was met with silence as Comer’s aides could be seen speaking with him quietly.

“Just to be clear for the public, his staff are advising the chairman to not answer that question,” Stansbury alleged.

Comer fired back at Stansbury once more.

“No, the staff said they couldn't understand what the hell you were saying because you blabbered for three minutes!” Comer said.

The Clintons have, in fact, refused to testify before Congress, and despite having been issued congressional subpoenas. Both have challenged Comer’s authority to demand they testify, and have accused the lawmaker’s request of being politically motivated.


Trump LOSES IT as Air Force One MALFUNCTIONS on FLIGHT

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald...

Senate Takes Big Step Toward Funding Gov’t as Some Dems Demand ICE Constraints

The Senate on Thursday passed three appropriations bills in a largely bipartisan 82-15 vote. The three bills, grouped into a...

Mediaite One Sheet: CBS Civil War, FCC vs Talk Shows, CNN Profits Crater

Today, we launch our brand new newsletter of media newsletters, which we are providing today as a free preview, featuring Bari Weiss, Minneapolis, and Davos.

The post Mediaite One Sheet: CBS Civil War, FCC vs Talk Shows, CNN Profits Crater first appeared on Mediaite.