Assemblyman Burke announces dangerousness hearings legislation

Assemblyman Pat Burke (D-South Buffalo) announced his intent to introduce a new iteration of his “Justice for Rachael” legislation that will allow criminal prosecutors to request a dangerousness hearing to determine whether or not defendants should be released pre-trial. This past legislative session, the New York State legislature passed reforms to the deeply flawed bail system. Those reforms eliminated cash bail and provided for the release of individuals charged with low level misdemeanor and non-violent offenses.

“Simply put, the bail system has been used to keep poor people in pre-trial detention while allowing for the pre-trial release of potentially dangerous criminals who have financial means, as we saw in the tragic case of Rachael Wierzbicki.” said Assemblyman Burke.

In 2018, 22-year-old Rachael Wierzbicki was shot and killed in South Buffalo.  Rachael’s accused killer was released on bail shortly after he was arrested. “Several factors should be included to determine pre-trial detention or release, but the amount of money one possesses should not be one of them,” said Burke.

“When my daughter Rachael’s [accused] murderer was released on bail, we went into panic mode and were completely devastated and fearful,” said Lauri Wierzbicki. “My daughter was no longer with us and an evil individual was free to roam the streets. It’s not about flight risk, it’s not about money, it’s about not putting a dangerous individual who does not value human life back into the community. Our family and friends are very proud of Patrick Burke for moving forward with this courageous legislation so no other family has to go through the terror we went through.”

“Without this legislation more lives will be at risk, just like Rachael’s,” added Mary Murphy, C.E.O. of the Family Justice Center of Erie County. “If there’s anything we learned from her devastating case, it’s the fact domestic violence perpetrators will stop at nothing, up to and including murder, to maintain power and control over their victims. Current laws give known abusers opportunity to continue the hellish treatment they unleash every day on their partners and ex-partners.”

Under current New York law, a judge can only detain an individual if the judge believes the individual poses a risk of flight. Assemblyman Burke wants to change that to allow the prosecution to request a dangerousness hearing if they believe a defendant poses a threat to the safety of others. He is introducing legislation to allow for pre-trial detention where an individual is charged with a violent crime and the facts show by clear and convincing evidence that release of the individual poses a threat to the safety of others.

Other jurisdictions, including the State of Massachusetts and the federal criminal code, allow for pre-trial detention in such circumstances. Both federal law and Massachusetts state law allow a judge to order a defendant detained pending trial if, after a hearing, the judge finds that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of the community.  Under Burke’s legislation, judges in New York State would be given that same discretion.

 

Related articles

Trump DOJ CAUGHT DELETING Files and PANICS on live TV

Trump’s DOJ was caught scrubbing Trump from...

Heart Attack Deaths Spike During Winter Holidays

The American Heart Association urges people to be aware of...

‘More anxious’: Republicans in panic mode after Trump’s lackluster address backfires



Republicans were shocked by President Donald Trump's finger-pointing and have questioned what's next after his lackluster primetime speech.

White House insiders and GOP lawmakers were reacting to responses to Trump's speech, CNN senior White House correspondent Kristen Holmes told viewers Thursday.

"Look, they're all watching everything closely, and they've seen how it's been reviewed. I will say one thing. The White House worked together as a team, as they often do the inner circle to craft this speech. And they needed a speech in which President Trump would stay on message, that was short, that addressed the economy," Holmes said.

Trump blamed former President Joe Biden, a common move he's made in the past — something his team has begged him to stop doing — and tried to say the economy was better than before.

"Now, whether or not you think his message was true, we obviously know that there were numbers that were inflated or just plain wrong. Or if you think that he went off topic, airing his grievances, he did talk about the economy more than we've ever we've seen him in the last several months," Holmes said. "And that is what the White House was intending to do, to try and get the message across that he is aware that things are not in the place that they need to be, and that they are working on it as an administration."

That message did not land well, she said. And Republicans outside the White House had a different response to what the White House had aimed for, "which is try and alleviate people's fears."

Instead, it only ramped up people's worries, especially ahead of the midterms.

"Republicans came out of that speech more anxious that the messaging around the economy was not where it should be going into 2026, and that the party as a whole was not really solidified in that messaging about the economy, especially when it came to all of this blame on the previous administration," Holmes said.

Trump's former campaign advisers have claimed that the president has previously made gains in convincing people he has an understanding of improving the economy. But now things have changed.

"The other thing they said was that it was a lot easier to run when President Trump himself wasn't in power. When you are running against something, you were saying, you can change something," she added. "Now he is facing the same exact circumstances that President Biden was facing at the time, and handling it the exact same way, which, of course, is raising a lot of questions as to where Republicans are going to go from here."