Last Month, the New England Journal of Medicine Published Two Major Papers by UB Department of Pediatrics Faculty

One of medicine’s highest impact journals published major papers by UB pediatrics faculty that will change the standard of care

BUFFALO, N.Y. – Getting a paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) is a career-crowning achievement for any medical researcher. This fall, within one week, it happened to two members of the Department of Pediatrics in the Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at the University at Buffalo, both of whom also happen to be Jacobs School alumnae.

PHOTO: https://www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2022/12/013.html

While co-authoring a NEJM paper by itself signifies that the findings are groundbreaking, the papers by UB co-authors are having an even more powerful impact: each reported significant positive benefits from the intervention being studied.

“The fact that the New England Journal of Medicine published clinical trial results by two of our extraordinary physician-scientists and alumnae who happen to be in the same department unequivocally demonstrates that Jacobs School research is fundamentally transforming the standard of care,” said Allison Brashear, MD, vice president for health sciences at UB and dean of the Jacobs School. “Western New York parents enrolled their children in these studies, experiencing firsthand how our community benefits directly from UB clinical trials.

Teen weight loss

On Nov. 2, Lucy Mastrandrea, MD, PhD, chief of the Division of Pediatric Endocrinology in the Department of Pediatrics in the Jacobs School and a physician with UBMD Pediatrics, was a co-author on the NEJM study that found that a weekly injection of the drug semaglutide plus lifestyle intervention resulted in a mean percent reduction body mass index (BMI) of 16.1% in teens.

This combination treatment resulted in a greater reduction in BMI than lifestyle intervention alone. About 40% of these adolescent patients attained normal weight. These semaglutide-treated patients also had improvement with respect to cardiometabolic risk factors.

While the drug is widely used for diabetes control and weight loss in adults, it has yet to be approved for teens. The results were better than anything the participants or even the researchers had anticipated.

“This is a major advance,” said Steven Lipshultz, MD, A. Conger Goodyear Professor and Chair of Pediatrics in the Jacobs School and president of UBMD Pediatrics. “It’s groundbreaking and potentially life-changing because it suggests that sustained improvement in weight is more likely when you combine anti-obesity medication with lifestyle interventions. If you intervene in adolescence, you have a greater chance to break that obesity cycle.

“This gives hope to adolescents with obesity to be able to successfully adhere to recommendations for weight loss, achieve their goals, and improve their quality of life and overall health,” he continued. “With nearly one in five children globally affected by obesity, watchful waiting for teens to improve with lifestyle interventions alone is often not an acceptable option. Based on the results of this groundbreaking study, it is clear that this anti-obesity therapy in conjunction with lifestyle intervention will be a welcome addition to the current standard of care.”

Targeted cancer therapy for children

On Nov. 3, the NEJM published a paper that described how children with high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma responded to a targeted therapy for the disease that has been effective in adults.

Kara Kelly, MD, Division chief of Hematology/Oncology in the Department of Pediatrics in the Jacobs School and chair of the Roswell Park Oishei Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Program, was senior author on the study.

The trial — conducted by the National Cancer Institute-supported Children’s Oncology Group (COG) and led by pediatric oncologists at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta and Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University — found that the multiagent chemotherapy, including brentuximab vedotin, was shown to significantly reduce relapse rates when tested in a large multicenter clinical trial when compared to conventional multiagent chemotherapy that did not include brentuximab vedotin. In addition, in the brentuximab vedotin arm, there was a 59% lower risk of an event or death, and no increase in the incidence of toxic effects at 3 years.

Drug approval for pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma

Just a week later, Kelly and her co-authors got word that, based on the results of this trial, the FDA has now approved the pediatric usage of brentuximab vedotin for treating pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma, the first pediatric approval for this drug.

Lipshultz said such approvals are particularly noteworthy.

“When I was a voting member on the FDA Oncology Drugs Advisory Committee, it had approved about 20 new drugs for adults over the preceding 10 years,” he recalled. “But over those same years, only two new cancer drugs were approved for kids. For very obvious reasons, those approvals are much more difficult to get. That’s why having brentuximab vedotin being approved by the FDA for children with Hodgkin lymphoma is such a big deal.”

He concluded: “Journal papers very often get published that report observations but don’t have the potential to immediately change clinical care. But both of these are groundbreaking studies that can immediately change clinical management and care of children and adolescents if implemented. Each involved prospective clinical trials with randomization and the results of each trial can immediately change practice, ultimately leading to better health for children and adolescents.”

The post Last Month, the New England Journal of Medicine Published Two Major Papers by UB Department of Pediatrics Faculty appeared first on Buffalo Healthy Living Magazine.

Related articles

‘Haven’t seen it’: Mike Johnson roasted for playing dumb on whatever reporters ask



House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) doesn't appear to know, and he likely hasn't seen whatever video, speech, or statement reporters want to ask him about.

For the past several weeks, as reporters peppered Johnson with questions about President Donald Trump's cognitive decline, violence at the hands of ICE and other federal agents, and even things said by members of his own caucus. He answered simply that he doesn't know and hasn't seen it, heard it or examined it.

A Religious News Service reporter caught Johnson in a fib, while others couldn't help but notice that Johnson doesn't seem to know anything about anything.

Asked about a pastor being shot in the face by a pepper round by federal agents, Johnson responded, “I can't comment on any of those instances. I haven't seen or heard any of those videos…Religious freedom does not extend and give you the right to get in the face of an ICE officer and assault them.”

"Note: I asked this question, and you’ll hear me say 'yes you have' here — because Johnson was already *directly asked* about one of these instances in one of earlier shutdown press conferences," said Jack Jenkins, national reporter for Religion News Service.

It comes after Johnson was leveled by Jon Stewart on "The Daily Show" on Monday. He showed a clip of Johnson being asked about Trump's demand for $230 million from the DOJ for himself. Johnson said he hadn't spoken to Trump and didn't know any specifics.

"Uhhhh, I'm just f---ed up," Stewart said, mocking Johnson.

The day after the DOJ question, another reporter followed up, asking Johnson's opinion on it. The Speaker swore he wasn't trying to dodge the question: "I haven't had time to dig into the details."

Stewart mocked Johnson for claiming he had a lot to do, alleging it was only to cover up the investigation files surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. Republican members are out of Washington for another week, and Johnson is refusing to negotiate on the budget or healthcare. So, many people have questions about what exactly Johnson knows.

"Mike has never seen or heard of anything happening," posted CJ Fogler.

"When not appearing at a podium, does Mike Johnson go to his office, stand facing a corner and stick his fingers in his ears? The man never seems to have heard or seen anything ever," Broadway lawyer Michael Salerno questioned.

"More s--- Mike Johnson doesn’t know," said Mueller, She Wrote's Allison Gill on Bluesky.

"Can a reporter grow a pair and just say what we all are thinking already?" asked national security lawyer Bradley P. Moss. "He is deliberately refusing to look at information so he can remain ignorant. Pure and simple."

Even "Mother Jones" commented, "Mike Johnson, the perpetually unaware, strikes again."

"Has Mike Johnson ever considered holding his daily presser an hour later to give him time to read a paper?" influencer Schooley asked.

15 amazing claims about nature we’ve investigated

Snopes has looked into variety of strange nature facts, from turtles who breathe through their butts to the shape of goat pupils.

Headlines for October 30, 2025

Sudanese Paramilitaries Reportedly Kill at Least 2,000 People After...

Survey shows sharp gender gap in political harassment

Female mayors face higher rates of politically motivated violence and harassment, a new poll finds.