Higgins Announces Approval of the Presidential Tax Filings & Audit Transparency Act

Congressman Brian Higgins (NY-26) announced the approval of the Presidential Tax Filings and Audit Transparency Act (H.R.9640). Introduced by Representative Richard Neal (D-MA), Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, following the committee’s receipt and review of former President Donald Trump’s tax returns this legislation will ensure that our tax laws are applied equally to all taxpayers, regardless of position or power.

“Congress has a duty to conduct thorough oversight of the Executive Branch as well as our federal agencies to ensure that our laws are being applied evenly and justly to all Americans. An investigation by the House Ways and Means Committee revealed that the IRS was not performing mandatory audits, in accordance with its own policy, under the Trump Administration,” said Congressman Higgins. “This legislation will ensure that no one is above the law, not even a president. It provides the transparency that our democracy demands to restore trust in our institutions and the function of our system of checks and balances.”

In 1977, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) adopted a policy of conducting mandatory audits on the President and the Vice President as a check on their power and to ensure IRS employees didn’t fear retaliation for simply doing their jobs by conducting thorough audits. The House Ways and Means Committee has the responsibility to oversee the IRS, including the mandatory presidential audit program. On December 19, 2022, following a four-year legal battle, the committee received former President Trump’s returns. An investigation found that the presidential audit program was dormant under the Trump Administration with just one audit opened by the IRS while the former president was in office.

The Presidential Tax Filings and Audit Transparency Act will require the IRS to conduct an audit of the President’s tax returns, along with any entities controlled by the President, as rapidly as possible after filing. It also requires the agency to provide public updates on the status of the audits and publicly disclose the President’s tax returns, along with those of any entities, within 90 days of filing. The measure applies to returns by the president while they are in office, as well as returns by their spouse, any corporations or partnerships they control, and certain associated estates and trusts.

United States Code Section 6103 provides authority for tax return information to be released to congressional tax committees upon written request from the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee. On April 3, 2019, Ways and Means Committee Chair Richard Neal made a written request for former President Trump’s tax returns to ensure the presidential audit program was operating correctly. Following multiple attempts by Trump’s legal team to withhold this information, the courts agreed with the Committee’s legal authority to receive the tax returns.

Congressman Higgins, a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, voted with the Committee to publicly release a report on Dec. 20 on the investigation of the IRS mandatory presidential audit program under the Trump Administration.

Now approved by the House, H.R.9640 will move to the Senate for consideration.

Related articles

8 claims about Cuba, investigated

U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to blockade oil from reaching the country in early 2026 made national headlines.

MAGA county clerk will get new sentence in 2020 election plot



An appeals court tossed out a nine-year sentence for discredited Colorado election clerk Tina Peters.

The Donald Trump ally will be re-sentenced by a district court judge after the Colorado Court of Appeals upheld her conviction but found that Mesa County District Court Judge Matthew Barrett had wrongly based part of his sentence on Peters’ exercise of her right to free speech, reported the Denver Post.

“Notwithstanding the fact that some of the trial court’s considerations were tied to proper sentencing considerations, when the court’s comments are viewed in their totality, it is apparent that the court imposed the lengthy sentence it did because Peters continued to espouse the views that led her to commit these crimes,” the opinion states.

The "tenor" of Barrett's original sentencing order indicates that he "punished" Peters for her persistence in insisting the 2020 election had been fraudulent and that keeping her in prison was necessary to prevent her from espousing views the judge felt were "damaging," and the appeals court sent the case back to him for a resentencing.

The appellate court found there was sufficient evidence to convict Peters and that she was not immune to state prosecution, and the judges also found that a purported pardon from Trump carried no authority under Colorado law.

The court denied Peters' request that a new judge resentence her, saying that issue should be raised in a lower court, and ruled that a prosecutor’s description of her case during closing arguments had no impact on the verdict.

“The evidence of her knowledge of the illegality of her conduct is so overwhelming, we simply cannot say that the prosecutor’s statement (even if improper) had any impact on the verdict, let alone an impact so great as to cause serious doubt about the reliability of the judgment of conviction,” the panel found.

Peters, now 70, was convicted by a Mesa County jury of four felony and three misdemeanor crimes for plotting to sneak unauthorized individuals into a secure area to examine voting equipment to look for evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

‘Shocked!’ Financial pundit says Trump’s speech ‘triggered’ 60-cent gas price spike



MAGA financial pundit Eric Bolling revealed that President Donald Trump's Wednesday night address to the nation had likely "triggered" a 60-cent spike in gas prices.

During a Thursday interview on the War Room podcast, Bolling said he had been giving MAGA influencer Steve Bannon updates on the oil market as Trump was speaking about the war in Iran.

Bolling noted that oil was trading at "$98 a barrel" before Trump started speaking.

"It really didn't move very much during the speech. I kept updating you. When he talked about the part where he said, we're going to send them back to the Stone Ages, I think that triggered something because that's really where it started to tick up to $99 a barrel, $100 a barrel," he recalled. "When he finished, I think traders were hoping to hear some sort of legitimate off-ramp, and it just spiked 101, 101, 102, 103, 105, 107, 108 or so."

"This morning I got up, Steve, and I was just shocked. $11, $12 a barrel, that's $13, $14 a barrel higher," he said. "Unfortunately, that turns into about a 60, 70 cent move up on the pump price just on the overnight alone, what it did overnight."