There is a whole lot of political junk on the internet

John F. Kennedy announced his campaign for the 1960 presidential election in January of 1960.  When did national political campaigns expand and became a 24/7/365 deal?  Maybe in the 1980s  or early 1990s.  Consider what may be the main causes of that development:  the explosion of the internet and the start of cable news networks.

The internet certainly does some wonderful things in providing and sharing information, but it also does a terrible job of separating fact from fiction, much less hyperbole from the outright dangerous.  Everyone can get their 15 minutes of fame and then some by posting comments on a variety of platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok.  Much of that chatter is just notes to friends and colleagues, but some of it is deliberately designed to go beyond what used to be the lines of accuracy, civility, and decency.

Cable news networks in many respects function like the internet platforms, except that cable literally goes 24/7/365.  To fill up all that airtime they recycle stories endlessly.  They use a continuing stream of talking heads who tell us their opinion about those stories.  Some of the commentators are ill-informed or biased.  The Dominion lawsuit against Fox News has exposed how phony some talking heads are.

Piggybacking on all this chatter are politicians looking to literally cash in on the commentaries.  I am referring to how politicians use the internet and cable chatter to raise money.  The internet platforms are often their weapons of choice.

If you have ever given a campaign contribution, no matter the amount, or if you have ever signed up to attend a political rally your name and contact information has gone into a data bank for use by whoever it was you came in contact with.  Campaign money solicitations make the vendors who run the effort rich; they pass on a relatively small part of the cash to the campaigns.

On a daily basis I receive scores of such requests.  They are all alike and different at the same time.  They come from candidates and potential candidates of both parties.

I trace the Democratic requests to my involvement over time in party politics and campaigns.  The root of the Republican requests goes back to 2016, when I traveled to South Carolina to observe the highly contested Republican presidential primary.  I attended rallies for Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, John Kasich, and Donald Trump.  In each case I signed up by email.  That is where the virus started.

What happens after the original contact is that both successful and unsuccessful campaigns or their vendors raise money by selling or “renting” the database of names and contact information that the campaigns have collected.  The information can be quickly passed around far and wide.

You may ask, why don’t you just unsubscribe?  That’s a good idea, but even when these solicitations offer an “unsubscribe” option, clicking on it often does not work.  Besides, it doesn’t stop other campaign committees and candidates who have your contact information from using and re-selling it to others.

Here is a sampling of the solicitations that I have recently received.

Presidents

  • Donald Trump (R/MAGA) in my estimation is the king of internet political requests.  I receive four or more per day.  The frequency would seem to indicate that the fundraising isn’t going as well as it used to.  You can give up to $11,600 to Trump Save America but he will accept $24.  In one request he suggested that “anyone running for the office of President of the United States should agree to take a full and complete mental competency test.”
  • Joe Biden and Kamala Harris (Ds) frequently ask for money for the DNC.  $25 would help.
  • Barack Obama (D) chimes in occasionally, as does his wife Michelle who recently asked for $10 to help elect Democrats to state legislatures.
  • The Clinton’s (Ds) infrequently look to help candidates.

President want-to-be’s

  • Nikki Haley (R), the first candidate to declare her candidacy after Trump, recently reported on her “walk with God.”  $25 would be helpful to her.
  • Mike Pompeo (R) would like to provide you with an autographed copy of his book, “Never Give An Inch,” for a donation of $45. He also needs “your help to stop the Chinese takeover.”
  • Perry Johnson (R) has a “Two cents plan” to save America.  He finished third in the CPAC presidential straw poll.
  • Vivek Ramaswamy (R) is angling to be the Andrew Yang of the 2024 Republican presidential primary.  He is the author of “Woke Inc.”  He could use $10.
  • Bernie Sanders (D) would like you to help him re-regulate banks.  He will be happy to accept donations as low as $2.70.

Past, present, and future House Speakers

  • Nancy Pelosi, former Speaker, frequently asks for $10 donations to re-take the House.
  • Kevin McCarthy, present Speaker, secretly reports on the need for campaign money.
  • Hakeem Jeffries, Speaker-in-waiting, every day at 12 noon Eastern Time asks for a donation to re-take the House.

Senators and representatives

  • Ted Cruz (R) is a frequent flyer.  He is up for re-election next year.  The “radical leftists are coming at [him] with everything they’ve got.”  $15 would work for him.
  • Rand Paul (R) is looking for help to “UNCOVER THE TRUTH ABOUT COVID.”  You can “rush in” to help with at least $5.
  • Cory Booker (D), advertising about twice each day, is fighting for police reform.  Five dollars is his minimum donation level.
  • Senator Jacky Rosen (D) says she is in one of the “most endangered seats” in 2024.  $20 would be a nice donation.
  • Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (D), who was just re-elected last year, is raising money for other Democrats.  $5 please.
  • Representative Adam Schiff (D) is running for the Senate from California.  Three dollars would be okay.
  • Representative Jim Banks (R) is running for Senator and would appreciate $25.
  • Senator Maggie Hassan (D) explains that she still has a campaign debt from last year’s election.  $20 would help.

Political committees and their associates

  • The NRSC is supporting no one in particular but would like $35.
  • Former Trump Spokesperson, Kellyanne Conway, knows “you’re extremely busy so [she] won’t be long.”  Just send $35 to the NRSC.
  • The NRA would like $23.  “The anti-gun movement has never been as crazed as it has been this year.”

All of this does nothing to improve the governing of America or the political process in general.  There is no end in sight.  If you have a suggestion about how to clean up this mess, feel free to add to my email inbox.  Just please don’t ask for money.

Twitter @kenkruly

Related articles

‘My favorite thing is to take the oil’: Trump goes off script on Iran war plans



President Donald Trump made several telling remarks Sunday in an interview with the Financial Times, revealing some of his administration’s potential war plans as it relates to Iran.

“To be honest with you, my favorite thing is to take the oil in Iran but some stupid people back in the US say: ‘why are you doing that?’ But they’re stupid people,” Trump told the Financial Times, the outlet reported.

Trump told the outlet that his “preference” in his administration’s war against Iran would be for the United States to “take the oil," invoking a comparison to the U.S. takeover of Venezuela’s oil industry in January when the Trump administration halted Venezuelan oil shipments to the Cuban government, and started oil shipments to Israel “for the first time in years.”

Trump also spoke to the possibility of the U.S. military seizing Kharg Island, an Iranian island critical to the nation’s oil industry.

“Maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don’t. We have a lot of options,” Trump said, speaking with the Financial Times. “It would also mean we had to be [in Kharg Island] for a while. I don’t think they have any defense. We could take it very easily.”

Trump’s war against Iran has sent oil prices soaring as Iran continues to block U.S.-aligned vessels from accessing the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial shipping channel through which 20% of the world’s oil trade flows. Trump has reportedly been looking for a way out of the war, though one former Trump security advisor warned that such an off-ramp may no longer exist.

Mark Sanford launches his comeback bid to Congress

The former GOP representative wants to retake his House seat in South Carolina’s Charleston area after losing to a Trump-backed challenger in 2018.

Trump breaks military recruitment vows as he arrests and deports veterans



The Trump administration has initiated deportation proceedings against 34 former military members over the past year and arrested 125 others for immigration violations, representing a dramatic reversal of previous policies that shielded service members and their families from enforcement action.

Federal data obtained by The New York Times reveals that immigration authorities also placed 248 relatives of former military members into deportation proceedings after the Trump administration rescinded Biden-era guidance giving service members preferential treatment in immigration enforcement decisions.

The shift marks a significant departure from longstanding practice. The Biden administration and prior administrations made military service members and their relatives lower priorities for detention and deportation, particularly when criminal convictions were involved.

The policy change directly contradicts military recruitment pledges. U.S. military recruiters continue promoting citizenship pathways for immigrant service members and promising temporary protection for their family members. Green-card holders joining the military have historically accessed expedited citizenship processes, and relatives can apply for temporary permission to remain in the country.

However, federal data shows the number of green-card holders applying for citizenship after military service declined significantly during Trump's first term. Currently, nearly 27,000 active duty immigrants and about 20,000 reserve and National Guard members serve in the military, with 115,000 immigrant veterans in the broader veteran population as of 2022.

Family members of service members now fear applying for temporary protection benefits, concerned that such applications will target them for deportation.

A prominent case illustrates the policy's impact. Sae Joon Park, a Purple Heart recipient who served in Panama in 1989, self-deported to South Korea in June despite living in the United States since childhood. After struggling with PTSD and drug addiction following his service, Park had fought earlier deportation orders and was allowed to remain in the country on the condition he avoid further legal troubles. An immigration officer nonetheless informed him in May 2025 that he faced deportation unless he left voluntarily.

Lawmakers have criticized the policy as both ineffective and disrespectful to service members.

"Donald Trump's way of thanking our veterans for their service is by targeting and deporting them and their families," said Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).

The Department of Homeland Security defended the policy, stating that no one should be exempt from immigration law consequences. The agency did not respond to questions about whether any detained veterans were ultimately deported.