Texas GOPer facing furious backlash over ‘sloppy’ plan to deputize ‘vigilantes’

A Texas lawmaker got an earful from constituents earlier this week during a hearing on a plan to deputize citizens to assist law enforcement officers to track down undocumented immigrants near the border.

With Democrats labeling the bill proposed by Republican Rep. Matt Schaefer as creating a “vigilante death squads policy,” hundreds turned out for the hearing where Schaefer was put on the defensive justifying his plan.

According to a report from the Intercept’s Ryan Devereaux, “In a hearing that stretched into the wee hours of the morning Wednesday, the Texas House of Representatives heard testimony from first-generation college students, undocumented activists, parents, and children about the inherent dangers of House Bill 20,” adding, “Schaefer, the founder and chair of the arch-conservative Texas Freedom Caucus, collapsed the issues of fentanyl overdoses and migration, ignoring facts and evidence to argue that migrants are responsible for a wave of death and suffering that exceeds the worst episodes of national trauma in modern American history.”

In his bill, Schaefer is proposing the creation of “Border Protection Unit” which would be tasked directly under the governor to “arrest, detain, and deter individuals crossing the border.”

IN OTHER NEWS: Pro-Trump PAC torches DeSantis for allegedly eating pudding with his fingers in new ad

Devereaux reports, “By midday, more than 300 people were registered to testify on Schaefer’s bill, nearly all of them in opposition. Many drove across the state to make their voices heard and did so despite the fact that Schaefer didn’t rise to defend his bill until after 9 p.m. Across four hours of testimony, one speaker after another blasted the proposal as racist, sloppy, dangerous, and unnecessary.”

According to activist María Treviño, “This bill doubles down on these racist and illegal activities by potentially training and employing anti-immigrant hate groups. I oppose this pricey, xenophobic, and unconstitutional legislation that undermines the separation of powers of our country and believe that Texas legislators should instead prioritize the health of our residents.”

You can read more here.

Related articles

LIVE: Newsom Makes BIG ANNOUNCEMENT

MeidasTouch provides live coverage as Governor Gavin...

Kristi Noem WALKS OUT of Hearing during CROSS-EXAM

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Kristi...

President Donald Trump | The Conversation

President Donald Trump | The Conversation

lead image

‘Psychopath or sociopath?’ Conservative worries Trump has proved he’s ’emotionally broken’



Criticism of Donald Trump's remarks regarding Rob Reiner's death intensified on Tuesday morning when a prominent conservative columnist questioned the aging president's mental fitness.

In a notably direct column for conservative publication The National Review, Jim Geraghty asserted that Trump's statements suggest "something deeply wrong." He proceeded to question whether "psychopath or sociopath" better characterizes the president's behavior.

Acknowledging the tragedy of Reiner and his wife Michele, who were reportedly killed by their son, Geraghty suggested that Trump's actions reveal long-standing indicators of instability. He characterized the president as consistently "obsessed with grievances; vindictive and prone to posting late-night tirades on social media; uninterested in details; erratic, impulsive, spiteful."

Geraghty argued that Trump lacks the capacity to assess moral character through objective standards. Instead, he wrote, "Donald Trump's entire worldview of whether someone is a good person or a bad person depends entirely on whether that person offers praise or criticism of Trump."

The columnist raised concerns about Trump's access to nuclear weapons while simultaneously pursuing aggressive military policies globally, suggesting his emotional state presents a national security concern.

Geraghty acknowledged that Trump supporters could defend his policies or express satisfaction with their electoral choices. However, he concluded, "But what you can't say is that Donald Trump is a good and decent human being."

He further contended that Trump's inability to empathize with the Reiners' tragedy mirrors his disconnect from Americans struggling with cost-of-living concerns. "This is why his approval rating on the economy hit 31 percent. There are far-reaching consequences of having a president who is emotionally broken," Geraghty wrote.

You can read more here.

Empire AI powers bold new research at UB, from surgery to climate science

New wave of projects push innovation in these high-stakes challenges.