Mayor’s budget a step backwards on tree planting


Buffalo has been cutting down twice as many trees as it plants in recent years. It plans on cutting down more than three times as many as it plants under Mayor Byron Brown’s proposed budget.

Investigative Post reported last year on the slow deforestation of the city, particularly on the East Side, where some neighborhoods are losing four trees for every one planted.

 “By removing those street trees, and even planting smaller street trees, we’re going to run into the problem of creating more and more heat, more and more temperature increases,” said Nick Henshue, assistant professor of ecology at the University at Buffalo.

Trees can not only be cooling, but help cleanse the air of pollutants and reduce incidences of asthma and other respiratory diseases, as well as cardiovascular and psychological disorders. They can also absorb groundwater after storms, and increase property values by improving aesthetics.

Nevertheless, the mayor’s proposed budget calls for the removal of 1,000 trees in the coming fiscal year and the planting of 300. Proposed spending for the forestry department is $896,601, in line with previous budgets. 

Why no increase?

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter


Andrew Rabb, the city’s deputy commissioner for parks and recreation, did not respond to inquiries from Investigative Post. He was, however,  questioned earlier this week by Fillmore Common Council Member Mitch Nowakowski during a budget workshop.

“Do we have a larger city view of buying and planting more trees, just as a general rule of thumb, since there’s so many benefits to them?” Nowakowski asked. 

Rabb said the city plans to apply for federal money — “up to $50 million” to bolster tree-planting efforts. Rabb said the application is due June 1. The grant is competitive and there are no assurances the city will receive funding available under the Inflation Reduction Act.

“We’re aggressively going after the federal grant to speed up and increase our tree-planting efforts citywide, with a focus on economic justice areas,” Rabb said. 

He added there are more than 30,000 vacant tree-planting areas in the city’s economic justice areas alone.

“There’s a huge effort that we need to be taking just to get appropriate spaces treated,” Rabb said.

Nowakowski, noting the availability of federal funds, told Investigative Post in October that he intended to come up with a plan.

“I have my homework cut out for me to really get ahead of the eight-ball to start really coming up with a plan,” he said at the time.

Nowakowski did not mention a plan during the Council’s budget workshop this week.

The Council is scheduled to send budget amendments to the mayor next week. The City Charter requires adoption of a budget the first week in June, which will take effect July 1.

The Council actually cut proposed funding for the forestry department in four of the last six budget years. 


Donate to support our nonprofit newsroom


The pace of tree planting has slowed in recent years. 

The city planted 1,428 trees during the 2015-16 fiscal year, 1,063 the following year. Since then, plantings have ranged from 479 to 239 annually.

Put another way: In the past five years, the city has cut down 4,646 trees and planted 1,728.


Our original story from July 2022


An Investigative Post analysis last year found overall tree loss between 2016 and 2020 was greatest in areas of the East Side. Masten and Fillmore districts lost the most. The North and Niagara districts lost the fewest trees, averaging close to the citywide rate of two trees removed for every one planted.

The situation “is one of the most despicable things that I can imagine because of the relationship of a green infrastructure, especially a tree canopy, to health outcomes,” Henry Taylor, director of the Center for Urban Studies at the University at Buffalo, told Investigative Post last year.

Henshue, the UB ecology professor, said: “I can’t list just five bullet points of the best things that trees do for people. But imagine these disenfranchised communities having just that little bit of extra bump if there’s a better health benefit.

“What happens when our neighborhoods can actually help make us healthier?”


Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram & YouTube


 

The post Mayor’s budget a step backwards on tree planting appeared first on Investigative Post.

Related articles

Farewell Highmark Stadium From Voice of the Bills Chris Brown #shorts #nfl #buffalobills

Subscribe to the Buffalo Bills YT Channel: https://bufbills.co/2Yhjq9j For...

Why unverified claim Barron Trump made $400K from insider trading on Maduro capture spread online

One trader made more than $400,000 betting on Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro's downfall. But was the anonymous bettor a Trump insider?

‘A lot of anxiety’: Top senators fear Trump is serious about grabbing Greenland



WASHINGTON — Greenland’s the talk of the town, which even has many Republicans nervous.

“The rhetoric going on now is irresponsible,” Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) told Raw Story.

The rhetoric — including the White House declaring “all options” are on the table when it comes to obtaining the Danish-governed territory — has only been ratcheting up since last weekend, when President Donald Trump deployed the U.S. military to invade Venezuela and capture President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores.

“You have to take it more seriously than we did six months ago,” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) told Raw Story.

“Did you see this coming with Maduro?” Raw Story pressed.

“I'm still so naive that I took them at their word during their classified briefing in December when they told us they weren't interested in regime change,” Murphy said. “Yeah, it's hard to take any of this seriously, given that they have had very little compunction misleading us in the past.”

Murphy was speaking as Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth went to Capitol Hill to give confidential briefings about the Venezuela operation.

With Rubio now slated to meet with Danish officials to discuss Greenland, an autonomous territory of the European nation, many on Capitol Hill are reassessing previous political complacency.

“I said all last year, ‘Ah, you know, nothing will come of it,’” Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) told Raw Story. “Obviously, it's at the head of my priority list now.”

Even many of President Trump’s GOP allies fear Congress will once again be left in the dark.

“It's hard to say what he's inching towards,” Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) told Raw Story. “They've kind of been a little bit all over the board.”

‘Wouldn't want to do it by force’

“In the New Year, where’s Greenland on your priority list?” Raw Story asked Sen. James Lankford (R-OK).

“Greenland was not on my bingo card two years ago,” Lankford said. “I don't even know how to answer that question.”

“Are you worried that this could be a distraction?” Raw Story pressed. “Or do you think it is key strategically?”

“No. There's some key strategic aspects there dealing with their own coast and dealing with the Arctic, there's no question about that, so that's a key relationship,” Lankford said. “It’s why we have a base there and have had a base there for years.”

To many Republicans, that relationship’s worked — so they don’t see any need to alter it.

“I wouldn't say it's a top priority for me, no,” Sen. Capito said.

While most Republicans on Capitol Hill don’t want to even entertain the thought of using the U.S. military to capture Greenland, they’re open to reassessing the relationship.

“It’s in our strategic interest to enhance our presence there,” Capito said. “I don't think that it's something that is a top priority for us, and I don't think it's something that needs to be grasped.

“Some kind of mutually agreed enhancement of our presence there would probably be a good start.”

Even so-called foreign policy doves — or isolationists — in the GOP are now openly courting the island country.

“It’d be nice if Greenland would decide they'd like to join the U.S.,” Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) told Raw Story.

“But I wouldn't want to do it by force. The only way that you'd convince Greenland to be part of the United States is by offering them things that would be to their benefit, not telling them we're going to invade them.”

‘Talk to the President’

With Russia’s war against Ukraine already straining NATO, bellicose chatter from the White House has U.S. allies nervous.

“Any type of move on Greenland, it'll threaten the existence of NATO, which will be inviting the end of the post-World War II international system,” Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI) — the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee — told Raw Story.

“They'll be conceding, I think, to the Russians influence in Europe that they don't have now — and China.”

But few doubt that President Trump seriously wants the U.S. to take over Greenland — a reality which means many lawmakers are now fielding calls from their NATO counterparts.

“I'm worried that even these threats, even this rhetoric has stirred our NATO allies up so much,” Murkowski said.

“I've talked to the Danish ambassador, talking to my friends, the parliamentarians in other Arctic countries — the Nordic countries — and, yeah, there's a lot of anxiety.”

Still, even with Greenland the talk of this town, many Republicans still just shrug when talk turns that way.

Sen. Jim Risch (R-ID) is chair of the nominally powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee but when Raw Story asked him about Greenland, he simply responded: “I don’t know.”

“Talk to the President,” Risch said.