‘He’s got it backwards’: Trump lawyer’s Mar-a-Lago docs claims torched by CNN legal analyst

A key Trump lawyer’s claim about the former president’s right to retain classified information at his Mar-a-Lago resort is completely reversed from how the law actually works, argued former federal prosecutor Elie Honig on CNN Thursday.

Honig’s explanation came in response to host Sara Sidner discussing her interview with attorney Jim Trusty the previous evening, where they argued over Trump’s repeated claim that he can declassify anything he wants and take it from the National Archives just by thinking about it.

“Let’s look at the Presidential Records Act and what it actually says,” said Sidner. “It says ‘The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of presidential records,’ and under federal law, willfully removing any record or document carries the possibility of a three-year prison sentence. We went — we looked it up, as journalists do. And nowhere does it say you can mentally just think about it and they are declassified.”

“You’ve packed so many misstatements into one question or whatever it was,” said Trusty. “The Presidential Records Act does not have a criminal enforcement component to itself. Look at it again.”

IN OTHER NEWS: Marjorie Taylor Greene: Calling me a white supremacist is like ‘calling a person of color the N-word’

“Is he right?” Sidner asked Honig. “There’s no way to criminally prosecute this? There’s no enforcement component?”

“He’s wrong on a couple respects,” said Honig. “There is an enforcement component. The Act does include some of the crimes listed by DOJ in the Mar-a-Lago search warrant. The other thing is, Mr. Trusty, who I used to work with at DOJ, not closely, he has it backwards. What the Act says is, presumptively, any White House or presidential records belong to the government, the American public. If you’re a president or former president, and you want to claim some of those as your own or restrict access, you can try to do that, and here’s the process. But he seems to say they belong to the president as an individual or human being, and if the government is lucky, they get some.”

Watch the video below or at this link.


Elie Honig debunks Jim Trusty’s reading of the Presidential Records Act

www.youtube.com

Related articles

LIVE: URGENT REPORT ON VENEZUELA INVASION | The Weekend Show

Army combat veteran and Democratic candidate for Missouri’s...

Jack Smith CHECKMATES GOP as PERJURY TRAP BACKFIRES

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on GOP...

Top Republican joins Trump reaming as powerful committee shut out of Maduro briefing



President Donald Trump came under fire on Monday from both parties' leadership in the Senate Judiciary Committee over his refusal to include them in the briefing about the operation to capture Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro.

In recent months, Democrats have complained that the administration is sidelining their elected officials from participating in Venezuela briefings while keeping Republicans in the loop. This time, however, Trump is simply not including the Judiciary Committee at all, prompting Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and ranking member Dick Durbin (D-IL) to release an outraged statement.

The Trump administration has repeatedly insisted that the operation was a law enforcement action, not a military one, partly because the former would not require congressional approval — but, Grassley and Durbin pointed out, if it's a law enforcement action, the Judiciary Committee should at least be briefed on things.

"President Trump and Secretary Rubio have stated that this was a law enforcement operation that was made at the Department of Justice's (DOJ) request, with assistance from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)," they wrote. "The Senate Judiciary Committee has jurisdiction over DOJ, FBI and DEA, and all three agencies are led by individuals who our Committee vetted and processed. The Attorney General herself will be present at today's briefing."

"There is no legitimate basis for excluding the Senate Judiciary Committee from this briefing," they wrote. "The administration's refusal to acknowledge our Committee's indisputable jurisdiction in this matter is unacceptable and we are following up to ensure the Committee receives warranted information regarding Maduro's arrest."

The capture of Maduro, while it has been broadly met with support from the GOP, has caused divisions among key pro-Trump factions who backed the president as a noninterventionist, and the administration's approach to the transition of power has generated further controversy.