The Vindication of Hitlery Klintoon

The Vindication of Hitlery Klintoon 1

So, Donald Trump improperly and illegally hung on to top secret and otherwise classified documents after he vacated the White House, and despite numerous requests from the National Archives and others that he return these items, which he was no longer entitled to possess, he ignored them when he wasn’t deliberately evading them. Allegedly. This will all shake out in federal court, as this pusillanimous simpleton is today going to be arraigned on 37 various counts involving the illegal retention of these records.

I have been around a long time, and I can remember the vile hatred and parade of lies that followed Hillary Clinton everywhere she went, with respect to everything she did when her husband was President. Then she became a Senator and then Secretary of State, and she was an accomplished, well-respected public servant in her own right. The cavalcade of libels and slanders abated only slightly. She ran for President in 2008, and again in 2016. Suddenly at that point, the noise and hatred grew to levels not seen before. The right has always had it in for her, because she embodied that which they hated most – a successful, professional, independent woman. She was haled before Congress to testify for 11 hours under oath about the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya, as if she had personally ordered it. She was all but called a witch.

But in 2016, it became a little different, as the parade marched not just down Clinton’s right flank, but the left, as well. Bernie Sanders die-hards went in on Clinton as hard as any Jim Jordan or Trent Lott or Tom DeLay ever could. They could not countenance the fact that Sanders lost to Clinton, so the libels and slanders grew louder and more ominous. After all, here were nominal leftists pledging to stay home or vote third party rather than select a Hillary Clinton over a Donald Trump.

As if Hillary Clinton would have separated refugee children from their parents at the border.

As if Hillary Clinton would have led a six-year-long pogrom against each and every possible socioeconomic or ethnic minority or marginalized community.

As if Hillary Clinton would have legitimized the North Korean regime by engaging in summit-level talks with it.

As if Hillary Clinton would have threatened nuclear war via twitter on any and all enemies – real and perceived.

As if Hillary Clinton would have banned an entire faith from entering the country.

As if Hillary Clinton would have denounced entire classes of immigrants as criminals and rapists.

As if Hillary Clinton would have shut New Yorkers out from the Trusted Traveler program.

As if Hillary Clinton would have downplayed the severity and threat of the Covid epidemic or praised China’s handling of it.

As if Hillary Clinton would have suggested you inject bleach into your body to fight a virus.

As if Hillary Clinton would have likened herself to be a tinpot wannabe dictator.

As if Hillary Clinton would have sided with George Floyd’s murderers.

As if Hillary Clinton would have sicced an army of cultists and idiots to end democracy and thwart the Constitution had she lost an election.

The list goes on, but capped off with Trump’s alleged illegality in New York, in Georgia, in Florida, the corrupt and malevolent acts that underlie his two impeachments, and his anti-American, anti-democratic, and faux-Christian nationalist tendencies, I think the country would have been much better served by a somewhat dull, technocratic, “neoliberal shill” like Hillary Clinton at the helm than some failed ex-reality-show host who was a disliked joke in his own hometown.

From about 1990 – 2016, the biggest political lie was that Hillary Clinton was some evil menace. The most damaging political lie ever told in my lifetime was that Hillary Clinton would have not been a substantively (or stylistically) different Chief Executive than Donald Trump. Like Brexit is doing to Britain, these pernicious waterfalls of libels and lies continues now to curse us with the shadow of the Trump cult, lurching and whining about score-settling. Who needs Hungary’s Orban or Russia’s Putin or Brazil’s Bolsonaro when we have our own anti-democratic authoritarian populist crook to whom fully a third of the electorate is in thrall.

The 2000 election was stolen from Al Gore and the 2016 election was stolen from Hillary Clinton. Nevertheless, Democrats keep plugging away and working hard within the context of the system we have. We don’t storm the Capitol or threaten elected officials with nooses or demand that these same officials ignore law, precedent, and the Constitution. We don’t marshal little armies of sycophantic brownshirt wannabes.

If Al Gore had won in 2000 we never would have invaded Iraq – a catastrophic blunder that continues to haunt us and the Middle East to this day.

If Hillary Clinton had won in 2016, we could have avoided all of the hate-filled, ignorant, reactionary sturm und drang of Trumpism and he would have been an afterthought by now.

And as for Hillary’s server and her emails, at least she didn’t store hard copies of America’s top secret materials in a chandeliered lavatory in her hotel/club/home.

Related articles

Ex-GOP spokesperson rails that red states are suffering due to Trump’s cuts



Former Republican Tim Miller, who hosts a podcast for the conservative anti-Trump news outlet The Bulwark, discussed with MSNBC host and former Republican Nicolle Wallace that the GOP is stiffing its own voters with slashes to food stamp benefits.

"I know food stamps is like a 90s era right-wing racist smear, but SNAP, which is sort of the new EBT — this is food assistance. [It] knows no partisan affiliation. If anything, it disproportionately benefits households in Trump voting counties and districts," said Wallace. "And it feeds a whole lot of kids who don't have any responsibility for any of the political decisions that adults make."

Miller noted that the GOP's rhetoric has clearly shifted from the days of Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and Mitt Romney (R-UT).

"But the policies are harmful to them. And this ... the expiration of SNAP — or the fact that they're not going to continue funding SNAP during this shutdown, beginning this weekend, I think is the most acute example of this, where, you know, if the party had fully switched to being a multiracial, multiethnic, working class party like they pay lip service to, this would be an emergency right now," said Miller.

The situation would involve Republican lawmakers fearful "our own voters are literally going to go hungry beginning this weekend. You know, we need to serve to service them. And meanwhile, Donald Trump's in China or in Korea getting a, you know, Burger King happy meal crown from the head of South Korea. And Congress isn't even in session, right? Like they're not doing anything."

He called it a catastrophe and a tragedy if the problem isn't fixed in the coming days.

"But it's also a very stark demonstration of just how this kind of MAGA populism is a lot of lip service and not a lot of action," Miller continued. "And you're seeing it in real time also in the states where, you know, in Colorado, Jared Polis and some other states, governors, mostly Democratic governors, are working to try to patch this right now. And in some of the red states, it's not going to get patched."


UB to offer a fully online graduate degree in ontology

The applied ontology degree will prepare students from around the...

The one official best positioned to stop Trump only has two months left on the job



There's one government agency that the Washington Post says can push back on President Donald Trump, but they don't have long to do it.

Writing Monday, the Post explained that the Government Accountability Office has an appointee whose term expires in two months.

"The agency’s leader, Comptroller General Gene Dodaro, has about two months left in his term, and Trump will nominate his replacement, potentially scuttling some of the Government Accountability Office’s most forceful attempts at oversight — including by taking the White House to court if necessary," the report said.

Already, the agency has retained a law firm to navigate whether the White House is breaking the law over spending issues.

“They are looking at everything,” said a source when speaking to the Post.

Once Trump is able to appoint his own people to the post, the agency will be "defanged," the Post described.

Congress can send Trump a list of who they think should be appointed, but the president can ignore it and pick whomever he wishes.

Office of Management and Budget director Russ Vought has spent his first few months in the post claiming the GAO is illegitimate and that it "shouldn't exist" to begin with. Republicans in Congress already tried to kill funding to the agency so that they couldn't afford to sue the administration on behalf of Congress, the report said.

"But the agency has taken on more prominence in recent months. A federal appeals court in August held that only GAO had the standing to sue over violations of spending laws, cutting out the groups that claimed harm from Trump’s decisions," the report explained.

“If Trump nominates the next comptroller general — I don’t want to make a political thing out of it, but his track record about caring about oversight and independent evaluations is not terribly strong,” said Henry Wray, a former GAO lawyer and ethics counselor. “GAO is really the only truly independent source of executive branch oversight in government.”

The most recent legal example is Trump attempting to kill funding allocated by Congress before he was president. The GAO could step in and say that it violates the Impoundment Control Act.

Read the full report here.

Trump has DISASTER WEDNESDAY as NEWS HE FEARED hits AT HOME

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald...