Some important political questions lacking simple answers

There have rarely been so many perplexing problems as exist today that are haunting government from the federal to the state and local levels in these United States. Most of the problems don’t have simple answers that can lead to a consensus on how to resolve the issues. Some folks in government have no interest in consensus.

This post reports and speculates on such questions. In some cases the questions just suggest more questions. Answers are elusive.

  • Matt Gaetz has filed a motion to vacate in an attempt to oust Kevin McCarthy as Speaker of the House of Representatives. Will Democrats join in that action? On the one hand getting rid of McCarthy removes someone that the party cannot really trust. On the other hand what comes next and how long would it take? The new 45-day budget Continuing Resolution clock is running. And what about aid for Ukraine?
  • Will the House Ethics Committee actually suggest expelling Gaetz from the House and would there at least a two-thirds majority to do so? Again, it may come down to what the Democrats choose to do. Hmm, get rid of Gaetz or let him continue to drive McCarthy crazy?
  • Why can’t the House meet its basic responsibility to approve an annual budget? You could make an argument that preparing the budget means that you are committed to having the government carry out the responsibilities required by the United States Constitution and the laws of the land. About 20 Republican members of the House, the ones really running the show, do not see it that way.
  • What does a TV network do when its ratings for a show drop more than 30 percent from the first to the second episode?  They usually cancel.  Yet even though that’s what happened on Fox’s new reality show, the Republican Presidential Debates, they’ve decided to try again in November.
  • What will Albany do about the very large budget deficits on the horizon over the next four years?  State Comptroller Tom DiNapoli’s office has prepared a report indicating a cumulative $36 billion state budget deficit over the next four years.  Revenues are trailing expenditures.  Extra federal funds are drying up.  Governor Kathy Hochul has ordered a spending freeze.  Actual cutting?  We are talking about Albany so we will see about that.
  • What are Crissy Casilio’s plans to cut taxes nine percent and end “out-of-control” spending? Following the release of the proposed 2024 Erie County budget by County Executive Mark Poloncarz, which includes modest tax cuts and some additional spending on various county programs, his Republican/Conservative opponent in this year’s election, Casilio, posted on Twitter/X that she “will commit to lowering property taxes by 9% by eliminating political pet projects, ending out-of-control spending, and giving the county surplus back to the people.” The “pet political projects” are not identified, but she must think there are a lot of them since a 9 percent cut in property taxes would lead to about $29 million in spending cuts. A large portion of the county budget is state-mandated, which means that her cutting would need to fall most severely on non-mandated items such as libraries, cultural institutions, public health services, and roads. Her plan echoes the plans of county Republicans from the early 1980s and late 1990s which did not turn out too well and eventually led to cumulative increases of 1.75 percent in the county sales tax rate.
  • Have the Republican and Conservative parties in Erie County prepared Casilio to discuss what she wants to do as county executive? The party leadership certainly has access to the talent who understands and can explain county government. That doesn’t seem to have happened or had any effect on Casilio’s very limited commentary on what county government is all about.
  • Why are so few people running for public office in Erie County this year? Everything is great everywhere? No one cares? The other party controls everything. Perhaps some mixture of those explanations.
  • Why is voter turnout likely to be so low?  Everything is great everywhere?  No one cares?  A recent report from the Pew Research Center indicates that just 4% of U.S. adults say the political system is working extremely or very well; another 23% say it is working somewhat well. About six-in-ten (63%) express not too much or no confidence at all in the future of the U.S. political system.”
  • If Congressman Brian Higgins is headed to becoming president of the Shea’s Performing Arts Center, when would a special election be called and who are the potential candidates? The rumor mill continues to churn. Governor Hochul would call a special election if Higgins resigns in the next several months. Given all that is on the table in Washington there would be a great deal of pressure to act quickly, but a special election could be called for April 2, the date of the presidential primaries in New York. Potential candidates could include County Executive Mark Poloncarz, State Senator Tim Kennedy, Mayor Byron Brown, and maybe some others. Kennedy would need to choose between a race for Congress or holding on to his Senate seat if the election is in 2024. Kennedy’s $2 million war chest could not be conveniently transferred to a congressional race since his treasury includes money received from corporations, a no-no for federal races.
  • If Mayor Brown is headed to becoming president of Buffalo State University, who will become mayor and who will next run for mayor? If the Mayor left office before the end of this year Council President Darius Pridgen would become mayor until a special election is held in 2024. If there turns out to be a vacancy in the office after January 1 then whoever is Common Council President at that time would be become mayor. That in turn would heighten interest in the selection of the new Council President by the Council members. South District Councilmember Chris Scanlon could be interested. So could Kennedy. His current campaign account could easily be transferred into an account in a mayoral race.

Twitter @kenkruly

Threads   kenkruly

Related articles

Why Seasonal Allergies Are Getting Worse 

By Annette Pinder  If your seasonal allergies feel worse than...

One Night, Seven Churches Holy Thursday Buffalo 2026

For the nineteenth year, Broadway Fillmore Alive (BFA) will host its self‑guided Holy Thursday pilgrimage through some of Buffalo’s most historic church neighborhoods—Downtown, the First

Trump breaks military recruitment vows as he arrests and deports veterans



The Trump administration has initiated deportation proceedings against 34 former military members over the past year and arrested 125 others for immigration violations, representing a dramatic reversal of previous policies that shielded service members and their families from enforcement action.

Federal data obtained by The New York Times reveals that immigration authorities also placed 248 relatives of former military members into deportation proceedings after the Trump administration rescinded Biden-era guidance giving service members preferential treatment in immigration enforcement decisions.

The shift marks a significant departure from longstanding practice. The Biden administration and prior administrations made military service members and their relatives lower priorities for detention and deportation, particularly when criminal convictions were involved.

The policy change directly contradicts military recruitment pledges. U.S. military recruiters continue promoting citizenship pathways for immigrant service members and promising temporary protection for their family members. Green-card holders joining the military have historically accessed expedited citizenship processes, and relatives can apply for temporary permission to remain in the country.

However, federal data shows the number of green-card holders applying for citizenship after military service declined significantly during Trump's first term. Currently, nearly 27,000 active duty immigrants and about 20,000 reserve and National Guard members serve in the military, with 115,000 immigrant veterans in the broader veteran population as of 2022.

Family members of service members now fear applying for temporary protection benefits, concerned that such applications will target them for deportation.

A prominent case illustrates the policy's impact. Sae Joon Park, a Purple Heart recipient who served in Panama in 1989, self-deported to South Korea in June despite living in the United States since childhood. After struggling with PTSD and drug addiction following his service, Park had fought earlier deportation orders and was allowed to remain in the country on the condition he avoid further legal troubles. An immigration officer nonetheless informed him in May 2025 that he faced deportation unless he left voluntarily.

Lawmakers have criticized the policy as both ineffective and disrespectful to service members.

"Donald Trump's way of thanking our veterans for their service is by targeting and deporting them and their families," said Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).

The Department of Homeland Security defended the policy, stating that no one should be exempt from immigration law consequences. The agency did not respond to questions about whether any detained veterans were ultimately deported.