Campaign financials highlight the race for Erie County Executive

It’s been more than two and half months since we have had a look at campaign financial reports for candidates running for office in 2023.  The main focus of the updated information matches the obvious political activity in Erie County this year.  The election for Erie County Executive involves the greatest amount of money and the most public attention.

A previous post noted the small number of actual Democratic/Republican challenges going on in the County.  Even where there are such races, many are not really competitive.

All candidates for office in New York State this year were required to file financial reports with the state Board of Elections by October 6.  This post reports on the county executive candidates as well as the candidates for town supervisor in the county’s largest towns where such elections are being conducted in 2023.  Here is the summary:

Erie County Executive

  • Incumbent and Democratic/Working Families candidate Mark Poloncarz has raised $200,129 since the July filing.  He has spent $449,161 and had $378,848 remaining in his treasury as of October 2nd.
  • Republican/Conservative candidate Crissy Casilio raised $45,022 in the most recent reporting period.  She spent $26,051 and had $130,236 remaining as of October 2nd.

Cheektowaga Town Supervisor

  • Current Board member and Democratic/Working Families candidate Brian Nowak: raised $14,159.  He spent $8,527 and had $37,994 remaining.
  • Current Board member and Republican/Conservative candidate Michael Jasinski raised $4,403.  He spent $2,780 and had $3,594 remaining.

Tonawanda Town Supervisor

  • Incumbent Supervisor and Democratic/Conservative candidate Joe Emminger raised nothing.  He spent $2,309 and had $6,631 remaining.
  • Republican candidate Peter Hojczyk had no financial report on record with the state Board of Elections as of the morning of October 10, 2023.

West Seneca Town Supervisor

  • Democratic/Working Families candidate Chris Rusin: raised $5,540.  He spent $1,723 and had $12,623 remaining.
  • Incumbent Supervisor and Republican/Conservative candidate Gary Dickson raised $27,168.  He spent $20,366 and had $41,162 remaining.

The next campaign financial reports are due on October 27th.

The county executive campaign

Both candidates are now up with TV commercials.  Poloncarz’s ads have been on the air since shortly after Labor Day.  He has been a running a positive bio spot highlighting his work as county executive and what he wants to do in a new term.  He also has an ad about his opponent’s now-deleted Twitter posts which discussed a variety of conspiracy theory subjects.  Both ads run 30 seconds.  The financial report indicates that $277,639 has been spent on the ads thus far.

Casilio’s 15 second ads started running last week. She continues her attacks on Poloncarz concerning the asylum seekers who have been sent to Erie County by New York City as well as personal conduct issues she has previously discussed. There is no reporting about payment for the ads in this current filing. The largest expense listed is $8,809 for signs.

As noted above, going forward with four weeks until Election Day Poloncarz has substantially more resources to support his media advertising and upcoming mailings than does Casilio.  A successful campaign, however, is more than just TV ads and mailers.

Seven and a half months into this election, Casilio has not demonstrated any knowledge or understanding of what county government does.  Even on her main issue concerning the asylum seekers, her response to Ch. 2 when asked about her plan for managing the issue was vague: “it is hard to imagine what I would do in the situation.”

Casilio criticized the 2024 budget that Poloncarz submitted and she proposed to cut the county property tax levy by nine percent, which would amount to approximately $29 million.  She has so far not indicated what county programs she would cut to balance out a $29 million reduction in tax revenues.

There are debates coming up between Casilio and Poloncarz: one sponsored by St. Joseph’s Collegiate Institute on October 19th; and another by WIVB-TV on October 24th.  The League of Women Voters is also running two candidate forums, one in East Aurora on October 17th and the other in Amherst on October 26th.  The League’s forums have invited the candidates for county executive as well as candidates for the County Legislature and town offices.  It has a “no empty chair policy” which requires that at least two candidates in a race must be present to participate in the forum.

Poloncarz is obviously prepared to discuss his work and plans for Erie County government.  Perhaps the debates will highlight the same for Casilio.

Early voting begins in less than three weeks, on October 28th.

Twitter/X @kenkruly

Threads Kenkruly

Related articles

Greg Cosell Breaks Down WR Draft Class | Buffalo Bills

NFL Films senior producer Greg Cosell joined...

Does photo show Lindsey Graham holding bubble wand at Disney World?

Graham's spokesperson confirmed the picture's authenticity and said the senator was back in South Carolina before it was published.

Trump turns housing agency into another weapon in his immigration crackdown



The Department of Housing and Urban Development has dramatically expanded its immigration enforcement activities, auditing thousands of housing applicants and proposing new rules that would force mixed-status families to choose between separating from undocumented relatives or losing rental assistance entirely.

HUD Secretary Scott Turner has instructed public housing authorities to verify immigration status for approximately 200,000 people receiving federal housing benefits, reported the Washington Post. The department is also sharing data with the Department of Homeland Security and has proposed a rule blocking mixed-status households — families containing both documented and undocumented members — from accessing housing programs altogether.

The policy would devastate eligible families. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimates that nearly 80,000 people would lose housing assistance under the proposed rule, including 52,600 eligible citizens and 35,400 citizen children. Housing officials report that for every ineligible person removed from programs, approximately three eligible people lose assistance.

Public housing authorities have raised significant concerns about the implementation. HUD provided 3,000 housing agencies with lists of flagged tenants and demanded corrections within 30 days — a timeframe housing officials characterize as impossible. After investigation, local officials discovered the vast majority of flagged individuals were flagged in error due to data synchronization problems, duplicate entries, or administrative mistakes like missing initials or transposed Social Security numbers.

Mark Thiele, chief executive of the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials, criticized the shift in mission.

“Putting that responsibility on them shifts immigration enforcement away from the agencies that are meant to handle it and actually puts eligible families at risk of losing their housing assistance,” Thiele said. “Housing agencies should focus on what they do best: providing homes for their communities. They should not be asked to act as immigration enforcers on top of that.”

Turner defended the policy as necessary to protect taxpayer funds and ensure benefits reach U.S. citizens. "Under President Trump's leadership, the days of illegal aliens, ineligibles, and fraudsters gaming the system and riding the coattails of American taxpayers are over," he stated.

Housing experts argue the policy won't address underlying housing shortages or lower costs. Of 4.4 million HUD-assisted households, only approximately 20,000 are mixed-status. The proposed changes represent part of a broader administration effort to use federal agencies for immigration enforcement, including similar initiatives at the Education Department, IRS, and banking sector.