Senator Gillibrand Calls for Rescheduling of Marijuana

U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand is urging the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) to reschedule marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III substance, citing the growing body of evidence supporting its medical benefits and the disproportionate impact of marijuana enforcement on communities of color.

“Marijuana is simply not comparable to other Schedule I substances like heroin, LSD, and MDMA,” Senator Gillibrand stated. “Moreover, marijuana enforcement has for decades disproportionately targeted communities of color. This means that people of color are more likely to have criminal records for marijuana possession and to face needless barriers to employment, housing, and educational opportunities as a result.”

Currently, marijuana is classified as a Schedule I substance, meaning it has no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. This classification has hindered research into its potential therapeutic applications and has contributed to the mass incarceration of individuals for marijuana-related offenses.

Senator Gillibrand argues that rescheduling marijuana to Schedule III would reduce obstacles to its prescription and encourage investment and research into its potential medical uses. Schedule III substances, such as anabolic steroids and buprenorphine, have moderate to low potential for abuse and recognized medical benefits.

“It is past time to end overly restrictive federal marijuana policy and I urge the DEA to do so immediately,” Senator Gillibrand emphasized.

The DEA is currently reviewing a number of petitions for the rescheduling of marijuana, but it has not yet made a decision. Senator Gillibrand’s call for rescheduling adds to the growing chorus of voices advocating for a more science-based approach to marijuana policy.

The full text of Senator Gillibrand’s letter to the DEA is available here or below:

I write to you concerning the rescheduling of marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). While I remain under the strong conviction that marijuana should be descheduled entirely, I urge the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), at a minimum, to consider rescheduling marijuana from a Schedule I to Schedule III substance.

 

In October 2022, President Biden initiated the administrative process to expeditiously review marijuana’s status as a Schedule I substance under federal law. Pursuant to the review process, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reportedly recommended that the DEA reschedule marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III based on scientific and medical considerations. We request that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and DEA take FDA’s recommendation into full consideration when determining the rescheduling of marijuana.

 

The CSA categorizes controlled substances into five schedules, with Schedule I classification being the most restrictive. Schedule I classification is characterized by its stringent criteria of having no recognized medical utility and a high potential for abuse. Schedule I is the same classification used for heroin and LSD, and an even higher classification than medical fentanyl methamphetamine – the drugs that currently pose a serious public health crisis in our communities.

 

Marijuana is currently categorized as a Schedule I substance, which has severely hindered our ability to gather the necessary data to make well-informed decisions regarding its legal status. Marijuana is considered to have a lower potential for harm compared to Schedule I substances like heroin. The acute health risks and potential addiction associated with marijuana use are lower than the risks associated with substances like cocaine or heroin, with it being virtually impossible to fatally overdose on marijuana alone. And unlike cocaine, marijuana is already legal for medical use in 38 states and the District of Columbia and in 24 states for decriminalized adult use.

 

Rescheduling marijuana to Schedule III classifies the substance as an “accepted medical use” and moves the substance closer to being legally available by prescription. It would encourage investments and research into its medical uses. Medical marijuana has been proven to effectively address chronic pain, nerve pain, and post-traumatic stress disorder – among other uses. Rescheduling marijuana to Schedule III will foster scientific research that can help further safe and effective marijuana use and marijuana-derived therapeutic benefits.

 

I commend the Biden Administration’s commitment to addressing the systemic and racial injustices of federal marijuana policy. Harsh penalties have deliberately stigmatized marijuana and disproportionately targeted minority communities for decades. Selective policing and racial profiling have led to higher arrest rates among people of color, particularly among Black and Brown communities, even when marijuana usage across different racial groups remains comparable. These disparities extend into our judicial system where harsher sentences disproportionately affect people of color. Criminal records for marijuana possession impose needless barriers to employment, housing, and educational opportunities, contributing to cycles of multigenerational poverty.

 

The DEA should move with great urgency to align themselves with the reported recommendations of the FDA and HHS to reschedule marijuana from a Schedule I to Schedule III substance. We appreciate your attention to this critical issue and stand ready to work collaboratively to correct the decades-long policy that has not only slowed the medical research of the substance, but also resulted in the deep racial disparities bringing harm particularly to Black and Brown communities.

 

Sincerely,

Kirsten Gillibrand

United States Senator

Related articles

Trump official claims ’50 years of discrimination’ against whites as lawyers flee DOJ



Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon claimed that the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division was guilty of "50 years of discrimination" against white people after about 75% of the agency's lawyers said she was behind a plot to drive them out.

"I think there was some denial and they had crying sessions together," Dhillon told The New York Post this week. "Frankly, it was shocking to them. They had unhappy hours. It was like a lot of drama and handwringing."

"I didn't fire anybody. I just told them they have to approach their job differently. They self-deported with a nice golden parachute from the government."

On Wednesday's appearance on The Charlie Kirk Show, Dhillon encouraged viewers to apply for jobs at the reconstructed Civil Rights Division.

"We just sued Minneapolis for discriminating against teachers who are not minorities and, you know, on and on and on," she promised. "And so we are hiring, and so lawyers with at least 18 months of experience who are interested in serving a tour of duty to help their country."

Charlie Kirk Show producer Andrew Kolvet lamented that white people could soon no longer hold majority status in the U.S.

"Let's say it was 83% white country [in the 1960s]; now we're basically 50%," he noted. "You give that another 10 years, it's going to be probably under 50%, maybe right around 50%. ... When I was born, I think we were around 80% white still."

Dhillon admitted that "we have a history of discrimination in our country."

But she suggested that the courts went too far with a 1971 decision that started the concept of disparate impact.

"So in other words, you no longer necessarily had to prove in your discrimination case, whatever the context was, that you are actually being the victim of intentional discrimination," she remarked. "You could simply prove that there's a hiring process or a policy, or there's certain, you know, tests that are required, and I, because I'm African-American, I can't pass a test."

"We have now issued a guidance that says that this 50 years of discrimination is against frankly law-abiding practices and businesses and recipients is over," she added. "It is harming a lot of people. It is wrong."

‘Modern Gestapo!’ Protests erupt as Kristi Noem leaves hearing early



Protesters lashed out at Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem after she left a hearing early.

Hours before the House Homeland Security Committee was scheduled to adjourn on Thursday, Noem said she had to leave to attend to department business.

"I have to actually leave this hearing early because the FEMA review council is giving their report today on suggestions for changes to FEMA," the secretary said before getting up to exit the hearing.

As she left, protesters could be shouting, "Shame!"

"You are the modern SS & Gestapo!" a demonstrator yelled as Noem hugged "Angel Mom" Agnes Gibboney, whose son was allegedly shot and killed by an undocumented immigrant.

Protesters accused Noem of using Gibboney as a shield.

Johnson bullish on Indiana’s upcoming nailbiter of a redistricting vote

The House speaker has been conferring with Hoosier State Republicans, but taking a lighter touch than the White House.