Arizona Supreme Court upholds 1864 abortion ban

(NewsNation) — Arizona joined a growing number of states that have effectively banned abortions after the state’s supreme court upheld a law passed in 1864 that outlaws nearly all forms of the procedure.

The 160-year-old policy “is now enforceable” after Arizona justices handed down a 4-2 decision on Tuesday. However, the court placed a 14-day hold on enforcing the new law, which returned to a lower court for further arguments to consider additional constitutional challenges that have not yet been cleared up.

Justices John R. Lopez IV, Clint Bolick, James P. Beene, and Kathryn H. King ruled in favor of the measure while Chief Justice Robert M. Brutinel and Vice Chief Justice Ann A. Scott Timmer were the dissenting votes.

Under the original law, anyone found to be assisting with an abortion faced 2-5 years in prison except in cases where the abortion was performed to save the life of the mother. The law was originally passed before Arizona became a state in 1912.

However, some state officials have already challenged the court’s ruling.

“Let me be completely clear, as long as I am Attorney General, no woman or doctor will be prosecuted under this draconian law in this state,” Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes said in a statement issued on Tuesday.

Mayes characterized the court’s decision as being “unconscionable” and “an affront to freedom.”

Justices said in its decision that after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, eliminating the federal right to abortion, no law prevented Arizona from upholding the Civil War-era law.

Under the law, abortion from the moment of conception was considered illegal except in cases where the mother’s life was in jeopardy. The law also made no exceptions for rape or incest. Another law passed in the same era declared that any woman seeking an abortion could face up to one year in prison.

That law was repealed in 2021.

In 2023, Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs issued an executive order that gave the state’s attorney general the authority to enforce abortion laws.

The four justices who ruled in favor of the law ruled that a law passed in 2022 that prohibited abortions after 15 weeks did not repeal the 1864 law or create a right to abortion. According to the Arizona Republic, justices ruled the 2022 law was enacted by state lawmakers because the prior law was enjoined in court.

In addition to the 14-day stay ordered on Tuesday, there is a 45-day delay before the law can be enforced, the New York Times reported. Once enacted, the law could force abortion clinics across the state to close, which would force women seeking abortions to travel to California, New Mexico or Colorado to have the procedure done.

Related articles

Trump LOSES IT as 25th Amendment DEMANDED during WAR!!!

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on leaders...

GOP Oversight chair hit with bipartisan demands to enforce Bondi deposition



Every since Attorney General Pam Bondi was fired last week, it has left the unsettled question of whether she still has to sit for the upcoming congressional deposition, where among other things she was set to be asked about the Jeffrey Epstein case files.

The GOP-led commission has stated Bondi won't attend. In a letter to House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-KY) revealed on Wednesday, Reps. Ro Khanna (D-CA) and Nancy Mace (R-SC) demanded that he publicly clarify she does, in fact, still have to participate.

"We moved to subpoena Pam Bondi, and the Committee voted to approve this motion on a bipartisan basis, because the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) still has not complied with the Epstein Files Transparency Act ... and because serious questions remain regarding the DOJ's non-compliance and their handling of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his associates while she was Attorney General," said the letter.

Bondi's dismissal as AG, they wrote, "does not diminish the Committee's legitimate oversight interests in seeking her sworn testimony or the need for accountability and information about files withheld from the public by the DOJ. On the contrary, it makes her sworn testimony even more important, especially with respect to actions she took as Attorney General, matters already under investigation, and decisions made under her leadership."

The handling of the Epstein files was reportedly at least one of the reasons Trump decided to remove Bondi, a longtime MAGA loyalist who oversaw a number of prosecutions of Trump's political enemies, from the Justice Department.

Bondi's abrupt reversal on the files, telling the public there was no "client list" and nothing new of note in the files after she had spent months hyping it up to Trump supporters, played a huge part in fracturing the MAGA coalition and reducing public support for the president. Since legislation was passed compelling the release of all Epstein files, Bondi also presided over the department as it slow-walked that process and blew through important legal deadlines.

"The American people deserve answers about whether Congress was misled and whether information is being withheld by the DOJ," said the letter, telling Comer, "We ask you to publicly reaffirm that Pam Bondi must appear on April 14 for a sworn deposition as ordered or face appropriate enforcement if she refuses to comply."

Conservative Supreme Court Justices could face impeachment as Dems plan next move



Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner, running against Republican Susan Collins in Maine, called for Democrats to exercise ethics oversight of the Supreme Court and pursue impeachment of justices if they retake the Senate.

Platner argued in front of a crowed, if Supreme Court justices faced the same ethical standards as lower court judges, "there is a compelling case for the impeachment and removal of at least two," likely referencing Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.

According to a ProPublica report, Thomas accepted undisclosed luxury gifts from GOP megadonor Harlan Crow, while Alito took luxury trips with hedge fund billionaire Paul Singer tied to entities opposing Biden's student loan forgiveness. Alito also faced scrutiny over a Christian nationalism flag displayed at his residence.

Platner additionally supports expanding the Court's size with a simple majority vote if Democrats control the White House and Senate, arguing Democrats must elect senators willing to "wield power" effectively.

Democrats are projected to retake the House of Representatives and have gained popularity in the Senate, where Platner's win could impact the Supreme Court.

Watch the video below.


White House blindsided after Melania Trump speaks about partying with Jeffrey Epstein



White House officials were reportedly blindsided after first lady Melania Trump gave a surprise address in which she admitted partying with two of the country's most infamous sex offenders, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

During an address at the White House, Trump decried the "lies" linking her to Epstein and Maxwell.

"I reject their mean-spirited attempts to defame my reputation. I've never been friends with Epstein. Donald and I were invited to the same parties, as Epstein from time to time, since overlapping in social circles is common in New York City and Palm Beach," the first lady said. "To be clear, I never had a relationship with Epstein or his accomplice, Maxwell. My email reply to Maxwell cannot be characterized as anything more than casual correspondence."

"I'm not a witness or a named witness in connection with any of Epstein's crimes. My name has never appeared in court documents, the depositions, victim statements, or FBI in interviews surrounding the Epstein matter. I have never had any knowledge of Epstein's abuse of his victims. I was never involved in any capacity. I was not a participant, was never on Epstein's plane, and never visited his private island. I have never been legally accused or convicted of a crime in connection with Epstein sex trafficking, abuse of minors, and other repulsive behavior," she insisted.

Trump, however, did not spend as much time defending her husband.

"Now is the time for Congress to act. Epstein was not alone," she said. "Several prominent male executives resigned from their powerful positions after this matter became widely politicized. Of course, this doesn't amount to guilt, but we still must work openly and transparently to uncover the truth."

Following the speech, MS NOW's Jake Taylor reported that White House officials "were caught off guard by her statement."