Meta bowed to White House censorship ‘pressure’: Zuckerberg

(NewsNation) — Mark Zuckerberg said Instagram and Facebook chose to “censor” content relating to the COVID-19 pandemic on social media platforms after facing pressure from the Biden administration.

In a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan, Zuckerberg made the revelation and added his social media platforms also “demoted” stories regarding Hunter Biden’s laptop.

“We made some choices that, with the benefit of hindsight and new information, we wouldn’t make today,” Zuckerberg wrote.

Zuckerberg said the White House “repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain COVID-19 content, including humor and satire, and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we didn’t agree.”

While noting it was a decision made by Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, Zuckerberg added: “I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it.”

“I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any administration in either direction — and we’re ready to push back if something like this happens again.”

Zuckerberg’s comments follow investigations from the House Judiciary Committee into Meta’s content moderation standards. The Meta founder’s comments are a win for conservatives who have long argued social media has favored the Democratic Party.

In response to Zuckerberg’s letter, the House Judiciary tweeted it was “a big win for free speech.”

“Mark Zuckerberg just admitted three things: 1. Biden-Harris Admin ‘pressured’ Facebook to censor Americans. 2. Facebook censored Americans. 3. Facebook throttled the Hunter Biden laptop story,” the post read.

Former President Donald Trump responded to the news gleefully on his Truth Social platform Tuesday morning.

“Zuckerberg admits that the White House pushed to SUPPRESS HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP STORY (& much more!),” Trump said. “IN OTHER WORDS, THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WAS RIGGED.”

Meanwhile, The White House defended its position in a statement to Politico.

“When confronted with a deadly pandemic, this Administration encouraged responsible actions to protect public health and safety,” it read.

“Our position has been clear and consistent: We believe tech companies and other private actors should take into account the effects their actions have on the American people, while making independent choices about the information they present.”

Related articles

The Landmines Under the Water

For a few hours, we didn’t know why several top prosecutors, including the recent acting head of the office, Joe...

MAGA influencer who stirred ICE attacks reveals ‘grim’ future: columnist



An analyst Wednesday described how the ICE attacks in Minneapolis and deadly shooting of Renee Good were all prompted by a MAGA influencer "chasing clicks" — and showed the potentially grim future of MAGA journalism.

The Bulwark's Andrew Egger revealed how MAGA influencer Nick Shirley's "highly misleading gonzo video" led to the chaos in Minnesota. Shirley was confronting workers at Somali-run daycares and health care centers over claims of fraud in a now-viral video created unfounded allegations that spurred into a new campaign under the Trump administration to target the Somali community.

"Within days, the White House was surging immigration enforcement to Minneapolis; Vice President JD Vance said Shirley had 'done far more useful journalism than any of the winners of the 2024 [Pulitzer] prizes,'" Egger wrote.

"If this sort of person doing this sort of work can be so richly rewarded on the right right now, it’s safe to say both that Shirley will be a major fixture of the online right for a while, and that many others will try to follow in his footsteps," Egger added. "But if he’s the future of right-wing journalism, the future is very bleak indeed."

In the past, and in traditional media, Shirley would have had oversight or rules to abide by. But that's not the case now.

"Much of the old press model has collapsed entirely, especially on the right," Eggers wrote. "Guys like Nick Shirley aren’t trying to join a publication, they’re picking up a camera and trying to go viral on their own. They have no safety net, no sounding board, no mentorship, no way to grow beyond what they’re doing this minute. All they have is the zero-sum game of the algorithm: Get noticed or die. Of course they’re going to do what the algorithm demands—which, on today’s right, means snappy, confrontational, fact-agnostic propaganda for the regime. That’s what the ecosystem rewards, so we’re going to get more and more of it. If you think that’s grim today, wait till you see the future."

UB scientist awarded $50,000 for acute respiratory distress syndrome research

The grant, from SUNY’s Technology Accelerator Fund, will help advance...