Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs invested in Elon Musk’s X takeover: Document

(NewsNation) — Hip-hop mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs was one of the investors identified in a list of names behind the launch of Elon Musk’s (formerly Twitter) venture.

Last week, a federal judge ordered Musk to unseal a list with the names of shareholders of X Holdings Corp., who helped the entrepreneur buy the social media platform for $44 billion in October 2022.

Independent journalist Jacob Silverman and the nonprofit Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press filed a motion in July to release the June 2023 records.

Around 100 entities are listed in the document. Some other big names include Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud, Jack Dorsey, Bill Ackman, Larry Ellison and Marc Andreessen.

Musk took Twitter private with his multibillion-dollar purchase of the company, proceeding to fire most of its executives and dissolve its board of directors.

In a blog post, Silverman wrote that “people have a right to know who owns a company with such a prominent role in shaping public discourse, both in the United States and around the world.”

Sean Combs Capital LLC, one of Combs’ many business ventures, is listed in the document but doesn’t say how much he invested in X.

Diddy lawsuits

Combs has been at the center of a storm of controversy and legal troubles where multiple individuals have come forward with allegations of sexual assault against him, leading to a series of lawsuits.

These accusations have triggered a federal investigation, with reports suggesting that authorities are looking into potential sex trafficking charges.

NewsNation partner The Hill and Nexstar’s Michael Bartiromo contributed to this report.

Related articles

Ted Nguyen: Ranking The Top WR Prospects By Position

The Athletic senior NFL writer Ted Nguyen...

VIDEO: David Kurtz and Brian Beutler on What a Real Opposition Party Could Look Like

We’re over a decade into the Trump era. To assess the damage his two terms have wrought and how, exactly,...

Trump exposed in latest White House East Wing court filing: analysis



Donald Trump may have partly written the most recent White House East Wing court filing with his legal team, an analyst has claimed.

Trump has faced a series of legal challenges against his White House renovations, particularly a $400 million ballroom project and the refurbishing of the Eisenhower Building's exterior. A legal team working for Trump asked an appeals court yesterday (April 3) for an emergency ruling, which, if granted, would allow construction on the East Wing to continue.

The documents making the argument to the appeals court appear to have been partly written by the president himself, according to CBS News' Arden Farhi.

He wrote, "The opening pages of the court filing are loaded with exclamation points ('Time is of the essence!'), parenthetical asides, misplaced capital letters ('Almost 400 Million Dollars of private donations'), and multiple adjectives for emphasis ('shocking, unprecedented, and improper injunction') – all rhetorical flourishes of the president's online posts.

"One sentence runs 130 words and covers more than half a page. 'Private donors and American Patriots singlehandedly funded the 300 to 400 Million Dollar project (depending on finishes), which is on budget and ahead of schedule.

"'No taxpayer dollars are being used for the funding of this beautiful, desperately needed, and completely secure (for national security purposes) ballroom,' the filing reads."

It has not been confirmed whether Trump wrote any part of the recent legal filing. The administration has put in new fiscal requests for this year, which include hundreds of millions of dollars for the project.

The administration’s fiscal 2026 proposal includes more than $377 million “for repairs and renovations to the executive residence,” with another $174 million projected for 2027, according to budget documents reported by Politico.

An Office of Management and Budget spokesperson told Politico that the totals include not only work on the residence itself, but also security-related costs, adding the funding is for “a number of renovations, not just the executive residence.” The budget does not specify which projects the money would fund, Politico noted Friday.