Live: Bryan Kohberger in court as defense challenges DNA evidence

(NewsNation) — Attorneys for Idaho college killings suspect Bryan Kohberger are set to ask a judge to dismiss most of the evidence in the case, which they believe relies on a genetic investigation process that they say is unconstitutional.

Kohberger’s defense team also claims the search warrants in the case were tainted by police misconduct. They’ll make their arguments during a two-day hearing starting Thursday.

If successful, their motion could significantly disrupt the prosecution’s case ahead of the trial, which is set to begin in August.

Prosecutors say the investigation, including the use of genetic genealogy, was properly done.

Part of Thursday’s hearing will be held behind closed doors, which the judge says is meant to avoid potential jurors being “tainted” by hearing evidence that might not be allowed in trial.

Prosecutors: Bryan Kohberger’s DNA on knife sheath

Kohberger’s attorneys claim law enforcement violated his constitutional rights when they used Investigative Genetic Genealogy, or IGG, to identify possible suspects.

The IGG process often starts when DNA found at the scene of a crime doesn’t yield any results through standard law enforcement databases.

When that happens, investigators may look at all the variations, or single nucleotide polymorphisms, that are in the DNA sample. Those SNPs, or “snips,” are then uploaded to a genealogy database like GEDmatch or FamilyTreeDNA to look for possible relatives of the person whose DNA was found at the scene.

In Kohberger’s case, investigators said they found “touch DNA,” or trace DNA, on the sheath of a knife that was found in the home where the students were fatally stabbed. The FBI used the IGG process on that DNA, and the information reportedly identified Kohberger as a possible suspect.

The defense team also says that once Kohberger was identified as a possible suspect, law enforcement officers either purposely or recklessly lied or omitted crucial information when they asked the court to issue search warrants for his apartment, his parent’s house, his car, his cellphone and even for his own DNA. They want all of that evidence kept out of the trial as well.

Specific details about the alleged police misconduct are hidden from public view. Judge Steven Hippler has kept most of those court filings, along with many of the court documents on the IGG evidence, under seal.

Bryan Kohberger can face death penalty if convicted

Kohberger, accused of killing four University of Idaho students on Nov. 13, 2022, can face the death penalty if convicted, a judge ruled last November.

Kohberger’s defense team sought to remove the death penalty as a possible punishment, but Hippler denied its request.

The deaths of Madison Mogen, 21; Kaylee Goncalves, 21; Xana Kernodle, 20; and Ethan Chapin, 20, shocked the small town of Moscow. Initially, investigators had few leads and spent considerable time tracing the activities of the four students in the hours prior to their deaths.

NewsNation’s digital producer Liz Jassin and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Related articles

Governor Hochul Announces Lowest Levels of Gun Violence on Record as Shootings Fall 61% Since 2021

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMUKhNyj_LQ More funding for police departments. Partnerships with...

Trump in WORLD OF HELL as ALL PLANS BACKFIRE

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald...

Crack in Trump’s strategy could bring his whole midterm term plot crashing down: expert



New York Times columnist David French recently outlined a strategy that could prevent President Donald Trump from undermining the midterm elections.

In recent columns, French has sounded the alarm about "all of Trump's threats against American elections."

"Trump has filled his administration with cronies and true believers, and his attorney general is one of his chief enforcers. In 2020 Bill Barr, who was then the attorney general, resigned rather than continue to pursue Trump's stolen election claims," he noted on Sunday.

Writing on Thursday, French proposed pushing through the so-called Bivens Act, supported by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) and Reps. Hank Johnson (D-GA) and Jamie Raskin (D-MA). If signed into law by the president, the legislation would remove federal officials' immunity from lawsuits.

"It would amend Section 1983 by stating that officials 'of the United States' can be held liable on the same basis as officials of any state," French wrote. "That's it. That's the bill. And it's worth shutting down the Department of Homeland Security to get it passed."

The law would also apply to violations of voting rights.

"In my law practice, I saw fear of liability deter many constitutional violations. College presidents have removed speech codes. Police departments have changed policies. And not because of criminal prosecution, but from fear of substantial monetary judgments or injunctions from the courts," French explained. "I'm aware that it will be difficult to get Republicans to agree to greater legal accountability when they control the executive branch, when Republicans would be most likely to be held accountable, at least in the short term. And they would have to do so in force here to get past a potential presidential veto."

"But the Bivens Act would also hold Democrats accountable when they're back in power," he added. "It would give Republicans tools to restrain Democratic excess. The Bivens Act protects the Constitution. It does not punish any particular political party."

"Yes, a corrupt president may pardon the crooks and cronies who act on his behalf, but a modest change in the law could give them pause. Violating civil rights should carry a profound cost, and the message to the Trump administration should be simple and clear: Protect the integrity of the election, or we will make you pay."

The Upside Down World of the Buffoonish Ed Martin

Hoisted on His Own Petard In the roughshod world of the Trump Justice Department, politicized prosecutions are fine, but Ed...