What is a sovereign wealth fund, and which countries have them?

(NewsNation) — President Donald Trump has signed an executive order directing the U.S. to start developing an American sovereign wealth fund and said it could be used to profit from TikTok.

Trump’s new order begins the process of creating a sovereign wealth fund, which is aimed at generating more money for the government by investing in assets like stocks, bonds and real estate.

“We’re going to stand this thing up within the next 12 months. We’re going to monetize the asset side of the U.S. balance sheet for the American people,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told reporters Monday.

Specific details were scarce, but Trump suggested the fund could be a way for the U.S. to buy the social media platform TikTok.

Here’s what to know about sovereign wealth funds and why Trump wants one.

What is a sovereign wealth fund?

Sovereign wealth funds, SWFs, are investment vehicles owned by countries. Typically, they’re set up to manage state-owned assets, according to the Center for Global Development (CGD), a Washington-based think tank.

Different SWFs have different financial, economic and political objectives.

Some function like a savings fund — nest eggs where current money gets invested for future generations. Those funds have decadeslong investment horizons and are often set up by commodity-rich countries to save a portion of their resource wealth for later on, according to The International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds.

Other sovereign wealth funds are intended as stabilization funds, which governments can draw on to smooth the budget.

Many funds have multiple objectives, mixing stabilization, savings and development.

Trump didn’t offer many details on the fund’s strategic focus or where the money to start it would come from.

Sovereign wealth funds typically start with a wealth surplus, but given the United States budget track record, relying on hypothetical future surpluses is unrealistic, experts at the CGD wrote in a recent report.

What does it mean for TikTok?

Trump said TikTok, which is owned by China-based ByteDance, was an example of what he could put in a new U.S. sovereign wealth fund.

“We might put that in the sovereign wealth fund, whatever we make, or we do a partnership with very wealthy people, a lot of options,” he said of TikTok. “But we could put that as an example in the fund. We have a lot of other things that we could put in the fund.”

As one of his first acts in office, Trump directed his Justice Department to pause enforcement of the TikTok ban until early April. The president has said he’s looking to have the U.S. government broker a deal for 50% control of the popular social media platform.

In theory, a sovereign wealth fund is one way the U.S. could acquire a stake in the company without nationalizing it.

Which countries have sovereign wealth funds?

There are over 90 sovereign wealth funds around the world that manage over $8 trillion in assets, according to The International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds.

Norway’s $1.8 trillion sovereign wealth fund is the largest. The fund invests revenues from the nation’s oil and gas production and is one of the world’s largest investors, owning on average 1.5% of all stocks listed worldwide, according to Reuters.

The Norwegian fund’s current value corresponds to about $321,000 for every man, woman and child living in the country of 5.6 million people.

Other countries with major sovereign wealth funds include China, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, according to the Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute.

Trump predicted that the U.S. could eventually top Saudi Arabia’s fund size.

“Eventually, we’ll catch it,” he promised in the Oval Office on Monday.

Howard Lutnick, Trump’s pick for Commerce Secretary, added: “The extraordinary size and scale of the U.S government and the business it does with companies should create value for American citizens.”

Which US states have sovereign wealth funds?

The U.S. already has 21 sovereign wealth funds at the state level, according to the CGD.

The largest ones are based in Alaska, New Mexico and Texas and are funded through the proceeds of oil, gas and mineral revenue. Those funds are primarily used to pay for in-state programs like education and state government operations, CGD said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Related articles

Laughter erupts as James Comer blanks in House hearing: ‘I wasn’t paying attention’



A hearing room for the House Oversight Committee erupted into laughter Wednesday after the committee chair, Rep. James Comer (R-KY), blanked on a question asked by a Democratic committee member.

Wednesday’s hearing saw the committee fiercely debate whether to hold Bill and Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress for defying a congressional subpoena to testify about their connections to Jeffrey Epstein and his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell. Challenging the measure was Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-NM), who pressed Comer on whether the committee had already been informed that the Clintons were willing to testify on the record.

“It's my understanding that you guys have received correspondence by phone, email and a written letter from the attorneys from the Clintons offering to [testify] on the record, with you, with the staff... is that correct?” Stansbury asked.

“I didn't... I wasn't paying attention to your question,” Comer admitted, sparking an eruption of laughter in the room, including from Stansbury, who moved to ask her question again, albeit more slowly.

“Okay – we're pursuant to a motion you brought for contempt, and the claim is that you have made reasonable accommodations and that [the Clintons] have not been responsive,” Stansbury repeated.

“But they have transmitted correspondence to all of the members of the committee – including yourself – including a letter from their attorneys stating that they have offered by phone, by email to meet with you, on the record, to give sworn statements. Is that correct?”

Comer’s first reaction was to speak of how the Clintons had been given “five months” to appear before Congress before being pressed by Stansbury again: “yes or no,” she asked.

“You all are trying to create a false narrative!” Comer fired back. “You've had five months, you should have gotten to the Clintons before the contempt vote!”

Stansbury asked once more for Comer to answer her question, but was met with silence as Comer’s aides could be seen speaking with him quietly.

“Just to be clear for the public, his staff are advising the chairman to not answer that question,” Stansbury alleged.

Comer fired back at Stansbury once more.

“No, the staff said they couldn't understand what the hell you were saying because you blabbered for three minutes!” Comer said.

The Clintons have, in fact, refused to testify before Congress, and despite having been issued congressional subpoenas. Both have challenged Comer’s authority to demand they testify, and have accused the lawmaker’s request of being politically motivated.


SCOTUS Skeptical Trump’s Truth Social Posts Count As Due Process

Justice Sonia Sotomayor summed up Wednesday morning’s two-hour oral arguments on whether or not Trump could fire Federal Reserve Governor...

San Francisco Giants Star Detained by Immigration Officials Over ‘Paperwork Issue,’ Later Released

San Franciso Giants outfielder Jung Hoo Lee was detained by immigration officials shortly after his arrival at Los Angeles International Airport on Wednesday.

The post San Francisco Giants Star Detained by Immigration Officials Over ‘Paperwork Issue,’ Later Released first appeared on Mediaite.

Secret Internal Memo Exposes the Scale of ICE’s Lawlessness

Morning Memo Live! Details and tickets here for the Jan. 29 event in DC. (TPM members should look out for...