Declassified: The JFK Assassination

For more from Ross Coulthart on the JFK assassination and other stories the media is supposedly not meant to tell, watch his series, “Reality Check,” on YouTube now.

(NewsNation) — The remaining classified files on the assassination of former President John F. Kennedy were released Tuesday evening on the National Archives website.

It, however, remains unclear which documents are new and which ones have been released unredacted.

The long-awaited release has so far yielded little new information. Despite hopes that the files might contain groundbreaking details, early reviews suggest much of the material has been previously available in some form.

President Donald Trump said Friday that individuals will be able to make their own “determination” as to who killed JFK.

“I don’t think there’s anything that’s earth-shattering,” said Trump. “But you’ll have to make that determination.”

So far, there hasn’t been any “smoking gun” that would validate decades-old conspiracies about the assassination.

The biggest takeaway from the new JFK files? The CIA ‘failures’: Coulthart

The latest release of formerly classified files related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy are mostly, according to investigative journalist Ross Coulthart, a “nothingburger,” but he believes it’s likely there isn’t anything the government can do to dispel conspiracy theories related to the case.

“Frankly, I do think there are arguments that are worthy of investigation, that there should be a broader investigation into claims that there were multiple shooters and the unanswered questions surrounding the forensics in the Warren Commission that have only recently come to light,” said Coulthart.

The long-awaited file release has so far yielded little new information. Despite hopes that the files might contain groundbreaking details, early reviews suggest much of the material has been previously available in some form.

Coulthart believes it is unlikely that any revelation about the killing of a president would be found written in a government document, let alone allowed in the National Archives.

“It is a bit naive of us to expect to think that there might have been something in those files suggesting some kind of CIA conspiracy,” he said. “Why would they put it in writing?”

Coulthart, however, believes President Donald Trump’s decision to release the remaining files shows a degree of transparency not seen in previous administrations.

“That truly is an extraordinary achievement and a great moment in accountability and transparency,” he said.

What Coulthart believes is most evident in the files? The CIA’s “failures.”

“The history of the CIA, sadly, is one of an intelligence agency that has, frankly, missed so much.”

Abraham Zapruder’s verbal account of JFK death is preserved, too

Abraham Zapruder, the Dallas businessman who filmed the Nov. 22, 1963, assassination of President John F. Kennedy, was private and reluctant to talk about what he had experienced.

But he did speak to radio journalist Marvin Scott, who says it took a lot of cajoling and a charm offensive. The interview took place in 1966, three years after the president’s murder and four years before Zapruder’s own death.

Scott donated the original tape of the interview to The Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza, which commemorates the event that changed the world.

On tape, Zapruder described seeing Kennedy’s open car coming into view.

“Jacqueline and the president are waving,” Zapruder said, referring to Kennedy’s wife, first lady Jacqueline Kennedy. “As he came in line with my camera, I heard a shot. I saw the president lean over to Jacqueline. Then the second shot came. And then I realized I saw his head open up, and I started yelling, ‘They killed him. They killed him.’ And I continued shooting until he went under the underpass.”

Zapruder said he never forgot what he saw.

“It’s left in my mind like a wound that heals up, but yet there’s a pain left,” he told Scott.

The photographer expressed doubt about theories of a second gunman hiding behind a fence. Zapruder said he would have heard shots coming from the location, which was about 30 feet behind him.

The 26 seconds of footage that comprise Zapruder’s record of the Kennedy assassination was tightly controlled for years. “Life” magazine initially purchased the film and published still images in black and white.

The shaky film is ubiquitous today, but it didn’t appear on national television until 1975 through the efforts of investigative journalist Geraldo Rivera. Rivera, a correspondent-at-large for NewsNation, at the time hosted an ABC show called “Good Night, America.”

He said he tracked down a copy of the footage, which he called “astounding,” and had to reassure his bosses that he would take legal responsibility for airing the copyrighted material.

“I ultimately had to sign a document with ABC, my network, wherein I accepted personal responsibility for the onetime-only airing of the Zapruder film,” Rivera said. “And we put it on, and it launched an industry.”

JFK files: Who is David Lamar Christ?

The newly declassified documents from the John F. Kennedy assassination files have shed light on David Lamar Christ, an American intelligence operative imprisoned in Cuba during the 1960s whose case raised significant national security concerns.

According to the files, Christ was involved in “Operation Palladium,” a covert American program designed to spoof unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) in Soviet airspace. The operation aimed to create false radar readings that would lead Soviet defense systems to dismiss actual threats as phantom readings in the event of a genuine American strike.

Former Australian intelligence official Geoff Cruickshank, who analyzed the recently released documents, confirmed that the declassified National Security Council notes reveal U.S. authorities were actively planning to break Christ out of Cuban captivity.

American officials were concerned that under torture or interrogation, Christ might reveal sensitive details about Operation Palladium to the Soviets.

“They were trying to break him out,” Cruickshank told NewsNation.

The documents suggest a possible connection between Christ’s imprisonment and the Bay of Pigs invasion, with Cruickshank noting that “a lot of people have thought that maybe the Bay of Pigs was actually a cover for the jailbreak.”

Cuban authorities apparently anticipated such a rescue attempt.

According to Cruickshank, they had “lined the Isle of Pines prison with explosives” to prevent a jailbreak, prepared to “blow it up and kill Christ and everyone with him,” if necessary.

The newly declassified files also indicate that Kennedy had concerns about anomalous objects detected during American thermonuclear weapons tests in the Pacific. Kennedy reportedly worried these phenomena might be misinterpreted by the Soviets as signs of an impending American attack.

Cruickshank said he believes now is the “perfect time” for the CIA to be fully transparent, otherwise it could be a “slow-moving trainwreck for them for months.”

Related articles

This terrifying Trump plot to steal elections is already underway



Recently, Steve Bannon told an audience:

“And I will tell you right now, as God is my witness, if we lose the midterms … some in this room are going to prison — myself included.”

Now, it looks like Donald Trump and the people around him are seriously considering declaring an emergency to let them seize control of this November’s elections, according to reporting in the Washington Post:

“Pro-Trump activists who say they are in coordination with the White House are circulating a 17-page draft executive order that claims China interfered in the 2020 election as a basis to declare a national emergency that would unlock extraordinary presidential power over voting.”

Trump and the lickspittles and criminals he’s surrounded himself with are in a panic. If Democrats take the House and/or Senate in this November’s elections, they’ll have the power of subpoena so the regime’s crimes and corruption will be laid out for everybody to see. Some could even go to prison, including Trump himself.

He’s been basically screaming, “Do something!!!” at Republicans for the past year. It started publicly with his demanding that Texas and then other red states further gerrymander their elections to reduce the number of Democrats in the House.

In red states they’re purging voters in Blue cities from the rolls like there’s no tomorrow, and the GOP is trying to recruit “election observers” to challenge signatures on mail-in ballots on an industrial level. As reporter Greg Palast pointed out, this is how Trump took the White House in 2024; if it hadn’t been for over 4 million (mostly Black) fully qualified US citizens being purged or having their ballots rejected after technical challenges, Kamala Harris would be our president today.

But given how badly Trump’s doing in the polls today, even all these efforts don’t look like they’ll be enough to keep the House and Senate in Republican hands.

So now Trump toadies like Jerome Corsi (the creator of the Birther movement and the Swift Boat slurs, who’s been a guest on my program multiple times) have an idea: just imitate what Putin, Orbán, Hitler, and other dictators have done to hang onto power when they get unpopular: declare an emergency and use it to rig the election.

Yesterday, the Post detailed how MAGA-aligned activists are now openly discussing manufacturing or exaggerating a national emergency to justify Trump’s agents in the federal government to interfere in this November’s elections.

These aren’t fringe anonymous trolls on some obscure message board; they’re people operating in proximity to the president of the United States. Corsi arguably destroyed John Kerry’s chances in 2004 and lit the Birther fuse that catapulted Trump into political fame.

And they’re floating the idea that if normal democratic processes don’t produce the “right” outcome, they could help create a fake crisis to seize control of the election nationally.

If you’ve studied history — and you know I have — that’s the moment when the hair on the back of your neck should stand up.

Because this isn’t new, creative, or even uniquely American: it’s straight out of the authoritarian playbook.

In 1933, Germany’s parliament building, the Reichstag, went up in flames at the hands of a mentally ill Dutch communist who was probably maneuvered into the act by the Nazis. Adolf Hitler declared it “proof” of an existential communist threat. Civil liberties were suspended overnight. Gone in the blink of an eye were freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and the right to assemble as Hitler’s goons began to round up his political opponents and throw them into his new concentration camp at Dachau.

Elections were technically still held, but under conditions so distorted they no longer qualified as free or fair in any meaningful sense, and the so-called “temporary” emergency became Hitler’s legal bridge to a permanent dictatorship.

Similarly, in Turkey in 2016, elements of the military tried to pull off a coup against Recep Tayyip Erdoğan while he was out of town. Erdoğan declared a national state of emergency and then kept it in place permanently. Tens of thousands of protesters were arrested. Judges and teachers were purged from their jobs, and media outlets were closed down for being “fake news.”

While emergency rule was in effect, Turkey held an election that transformed its parliamentary democracy into a hyper-presidential system tailored to give virtually all federal power to Erdoğan himself. It was the end of democracy in Turkey.

Vladimir Putin’s rise offers another variation. In 1999, a series of apartment bombings killed hundreds of Russians and the Kremlin blamed Chechen terrorists. The attacks propelled Putin, then a relatively unknown prime minister, into the presidency on a wave of fear and fury.

Putin then declared a state of emergency that expanded his police powers, gave him tighter media control, and let him seize control of the elections process. In the years since then, elections in Russia have become ritual rather than reality. The ballots are printed every few years, and the votes are counted, but the outcome is never in doubt.

Viktor Orbán in Hungary shows yet another model. He declared a “state of crisis” over migration by Syrian refugees in 2015 and kept renewing it long after migration levels collapsed. During the COVID pandemic, he got the parliament to give him the authority to rule by decree on an indefinite basis; it’s still in effect.

As a result, elections still happen (there’s one coming up), but the media landscape was completely taken over by Orbán-friendly billionaires (see: CBS, WaPo, LA Times, Fox “News,” Sinclair, Wall St. Journal, NY Post, and 1,500 rightwing radio stations). Orbán didn’t need to cancel Hungary’s elections; he simply reshaped the legal and political environment in which they happened.

There’s a common thread in all of this. The crisis wannabe dictators inevitably declare — real, exaggerated, or cynically manipulated — become the justification for seizing extraordinary powers. Those powers narrow dissent, intimidate opponents, and functionally rig the elections.

That’s why this shocking new reporting in the Washington Post is so alarming. When political actors like Corsi begin talking openly about declaring an emergency to override or interfere with elections, they’re not blowing smoke: they’re testing a classic dictator’s narrative.

They’re trying to figure out — and will learn from the national reaction to this Post reporting — whether they can persuade the public that normal election processes are too dangerous to trust. After all, in each of the cases I listed above, the machinery of democracy was used to hollow out democracy itself.

And they may not even have to manufacture an emergency: if Trump can sufficiently provoke Iran, they may activate their proxy network around the world and in the United States, and we could be facing a genuine crisis on the order of 9/11. This is one of the few ways to make sense of today’s massive military buildup in the Middle East.

The danger here isn’t just a fabricated catastrophe or a retaliatory strike by Iran, although those are pretty damn severe. It’s the normalization of the idea that if the electorate appears likely to choose “wrongly,” an emergency can justify changing the rules of democracy.

History shows us, over and over again, that when a nation loses its democracy to an aspiring autocrat, the language and strategy used is always the same. “The nation is under threat.” “The moment is an emergency.” “Normal rules must be suspended — just temporarily — to save the country.”

And in every case, “temporary” turned out to be the most dangerous word of all.

We’re now at that moment where influential figures are publicly contemplating that path, and the lesson from history isn’t subtle. The real emergency, in a constitutional republic, begins when leaders like Putin, Orbán, Erdoğan and Trump — and their toadies like Corsi, Bondi, Noem, and Gabbard — decide that elections themselves are the problem.

Multiple observers have noted that this plan is grossly unconstitutional. But so were Trump’s tariffs (which also used IEEPA emergency authority as their rationale), and the Supreme Court let him run with them for almost a year before stopping him.

Similarly, ICE goons kicking in people’s front doors and smashing their car windows to drag them off without a judicial warrant is a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, but Trump’s agents continued to do it every day. Something being against the law or the Constitution has never stopped our convicted felon/rapist/insurrectionist president in the past.

This plot will only be stopped if it’s widely reported and an outraged public rises up in opposition. Call (202-224-3121) your elected representatives — Democratic and Republican — and let them know you’re onto this plot and won’t tolerate it. And that if they have any fidelity left to the Constitution and American values, they won’t either.

Trump gets DISASTER NEWS as Dems CRUSH in PA!

Trump is getting disaster new at home...