Why do kids have imaginary friends?

Imaginary friendships are more common than you think.

An earlier version of this story appeared in Kids Today, Vox’s newsletter about kids, for everyone. Sign up here for future editions.

A Vox reader asks, “Why do children often have imaginary friends?”

Sometime in the doldrums of Covid lockdown, when day care was closed and social life felt like a distant memory, I caught my then-toddler trying to feed milk to a photograph of a bat.

Big Bat, as he became known, is a Mexican free-tailed bat who appears on page 121 of Endangered, a book of wildlife photos that a grandparent gave to us. For a period of several months in 2020, my older kid (at that time, my only kid) asked to see this photo several times a day. He greeted Big Bat, talked to him, and, at least once, offered him a refreshing beverage. During an isolated time, Big Bat was his friend.

I thought of Big Bat again this week, when I talked to Tracy Gleason, a psychology professor at Wellesley College who studies imaginary friends — or, as she and other experts sometimes call them, imaginary companions. While adults often think of these companions as invisible entities children talk to (which explains their prevalence in horror movies), in fact, an imaginary friend can often be an object that the child “animates and personifies” and treats as real, Gleason said. 

That object can be a stuffed animal, a doll, or something more unusual. “I heard about a kid once who was very close friends with one of those little cans of tomato paste,” Gleason told me.

Odd as that may sound, imaginary friends are extremely common. In one study published in 2004, 65 percent of kids reported having had at least one imaginary friend by age 7. 

As to why kids have imaginary companions, Gleason says they can be a way for children to work through the complexities of social life in a safe, low-stakes context — after all, your imaginary friend can’t get mad at you (unless you want them to). But there’s another, simpler reason kids play with imaginary companions, Naomi Aguiar, who has done research and co-authored a book on the phenomenon, told me.

“The primary role that imaginary friends serve in a lot of kids’ lives is just for fun and entertainment,” she said. “Kids do it because it’s fun.”

The social benefits of imaginary friendships

Imaginary friends are most common in early childhood, but middle-schoolers and even adults can have them too, Gleason said.

These companions can take a variety of forms — in the 2004 study, which looked at 100 6- and 7-year olds, 57 percent of imaginary friends were human, 41 percent were animals, and one was “a human capable of transforming herself into any animal the child wanted.”

In a study published in 2017 by Aguiar and other researchers, one 9-year-old reported being friends with “an invisible Siberian tiger” who had “power swipes” but also needed “comfort during rainy nights.” Another child had a stuffed pony named Pony, “described as a secret agent with X-ray vision who was really good at everything.” A third kid was friends with an “invisible milk carton” whom she described as “very kind and kind of like a conscience.”

“I learned a lot about Milk and Milk learned a lot about me,” the child said of their relationship.

Imaginary friends (yes, even milk cartons) can be a way for kids to get their minds around the confusion of social relationships, experts say. Friendships can be especially scary, because they’re voluntary and open-ended, Gleason said. While your parents will always be your parents, “your friend does not have to be your friend.” 

Friendships also have different rules and dynamics from family relationships, and those rules may not be clearly defined. “You can imagine why somebody might want an imaginary version of that to practice,” Gleason said, “so that even if things go awry, it’s all fine.”

Indeed, imaginary friends sometimes fight or refuse to play with their real-life kid counterparts. One 9-year-old girl in Aguiar’s study described a “tiny invisible boy” who was usually “kind and generous” but would sometimes pull her hair. Another kid had a gorilla friend who sometimes disagreed about whether they should go to the park. 

When an imaginary friend is a little difficult, “that’s the child trying to figure out, what does it mean when somebody doesn’t want to play with you?” Gleason said. “What does it mean when somebody is mean to you? How do you respond?”

There’s no reason to be concerned if your child has an imaginary friend, experts say. Often, those friendships are just a really fun way to play.

Imaginary friendships are developmentally normal, experts say — while these friendships used to be seen as a sign of loneliness or other problems, experts now say kids who have imaginary friends are no more likely to have mental health troubles than kids who don’t have such friendships.

Kids who have gone through trauma sometimes do use imaginary companions to cope. Children who have been sexually abused, in particular, sometimes invent friends who serve as guardians or protectors, Aguiar said. 

One study found that Japanese children played with their personified objects more during the pandemic than they had beforehand, suggesting an increased role for these imaginary companions during times of isolation (no word on the role of Big Bats).

But overall, there’s no reason to be concerned if your child has an imaginary friend, experts say. Often, those friendships are just a really fun way to play.

Christine Nguyen, a California mom of two, told me her younger daughter, now 12, has been friends with “Hammie” since the age of four. Hammie is a stuffed hamster who is rude and vulgar (he’s been known to eat “poop crumbs”) but also “wildly wealthy” — Nguyen’s daughter once made a video of him bouncing on a bed of play money. 

Hammie takes risks and lives large. He has gone sky-diving, and at one point got a BBL. Hammie also screams at people on car trips and sometimes has to be exiled to the dashboard.

Nguyen says her daughter has “always been a mischievous person, and she likes to test boundaries, and I feel like Hammie was a way to test boundaries even more.”

“Kids don’t have a lot of autonomy as they’re growing up,” Aguiar pointed out. “There’s a lot of having to do things in certain ways at certain times.”

But with an imaginary friend, “you have total creative license to create whatever you want for yourself,” Aguiar said. An imaginary relationship is one of the few areas of life in which kids “have total freedom to do whatever they want.”

This story was also featured in the Explain It to Me newsletter. Sign up here. For more from Explain It to Me, check out the podcast.

Related articles

MAGA county clerk will get new sentence in 2020 election plot



An appeals court tossed out a nine-year sentence for discredited Colorado election clerk Tina Peters.

The Donald Trump ally will be re-sentenced by a district court judge after the Colorado Court of Appeals upheld her conviction but found that Mesa County District Court Judge Matthew Barrett had wrongly based part of his sentence on Peters’ exercise of her right to free speech, reported the Denver Post.

“Notwithstanding the fact that some of the trial court’s considerations were tied to proper sentencing considerations, when the court’s comments are viewed in their totality, it is apparent that the court imposed the lengthy sentence it did because Peters continued to espouse the views that led her to commit these crimes,” the opinion states.

The "tenor" of Barrett's original sentencing order indicates that he "punished" Peters for her persistence in insisting the 2020 election had been fraudulent and that keeping her in prison was necessary to prevent her from espousing views the judge felt were "damaging," and the appeals court sent the case back to him for a resentencing.

The appellate court found there was sufficient evidence to convict Peters and that she was not immune to state prosecution, and the judges also found that a purported pardon from Trump carried no authority under Colorado law.

The court denied Peters' request that a new judge resentence her, saying that issue should be raised in a lower court, and ruled that a prosecutor’s description of her case during closing arguments had no impact on the verdict.

“The evidence of her knowledge of the illegality of her conduct is so overwhelming, we simply cannot say that the prosecutor’s statement (even if improper) had any impact on the verdict, let alone an impact so great as to cause serious doubt about the reliability of the judgment of conviction,” the panel found.

Peters, now 70, was convicted by a Mesa County jury of four felony and three misdemeanor crimes for plotting to sneak unauthorized individuals into a secure area to examine voting equipment to look for evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

Trump drops blatantly false outburst after storming out of Supreme Court hearing



Not long after having attended the Supreme Court hearing to hear oral arguments on the legality of ending birthright citizenship – becoming the first sitting president in history to do so – President Donald Trump took to social media Wednesday to lash out at the longstanding and constitutionally enshrined right, and with a claim that was blatantly false.

“We are the only Country in the World STUPID enough to allow ‘Birthright’ Citizenship!” Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social, just as oral arguments in the Supreme Court hearing had ended.

Despite Trump’s claim, birthright citizenship exists in dozens of countries, including the United States’ neighbors Canada and Mexico. In the United States, birthright citizenship was enshrined as a right in 1868 through the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Trump has long sought to eliminate birthright citizenship in the United States, signing an executive order on his first day back in office last year to challenge the longstanding precedent.

‘Shocked!’ Financial pundit says Trump’s speech ‘triggered’ 60-cent gas price spike



MAGA financial pundit Eric Bolling revealed that President Donald Trump's Wednesday night address to the nation had likely "triggered" a 60-cent spike in gas prices.

During a Thursday interview on the War Room podcast, Bolling said he had been giving MAGA influencer Steve Bannon updates on the oil market as Trump was speaking about the war in Iran.

Bolling noted that oil was trading at "$98 a barrel" before Trump started speaking.

"It really didn't move very much during the speech. I kept updating you. When he talked about the part where he said, we're going to send them back to the Stone Ages, I think that triggered something because that's really where it started to tick up to $99 a barrel, $100 a barrel," he recalled. "When he finished, I think traders were hoping to hear some sort of legitimate off-ramp, and it just spiked 101, 101, 102, 103, 105, 107, 108 or so."

"This morning I got up, Steve, and I was just shocked. $11, $12 a barrel, that's $13, $14 a barrel higher," he said. "Unfortunately, that turns into about a 60, 70 cent move up on the pump price just on the overnight alone, what it did overnight."

Trump PANICS as F-15 SHOT DOWN IN WAR!!

MeidasTouch reports on the breaking news of...