Judge to hear arguments against pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil

(NewsNation) — The Trump administration on Thursday will make its case to deport pro-Palestine activist and recent Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil.

During a Thursday morning hearing, the federal government is expected to expand on its newest accusations against Khalil, who was arrested earlier this month and taken to an Immigrations and Customs Enforcement detention center.

Khalil holds legal permanent resident status in the United States.

The federal government now accuses Khalil of lying on his green card application. Khalil also allegedly lied about his involvement with a Columbia University coalition of anti-Israel student organizations.

The Justice Department said Khalil failed to mention he worked in the Syria office of the British embassy in Lebanon.

They also accuse Khalil of being a member of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees, which UNRWA denies.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has defended Khalil’s arrest, writing on X earlier this month: “We will be revoking the visas and/or green cards of Hamas supporters in America so they can be deported.”

ICE arrests students connected to protests

Since then, ICE agents have arrested Yunseo Chung, a 21-year-old Columbia student and lawful permanent resident from South Korea, and Georgetown University professor and Indian national Badar Khan Suri.

Both were accused of supporting Hamas, but the government hasn’t shown any evidence to support those accusations.

Attorneys for Yunseo Chung filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump and other top officials alleging government overreach for seeking Chung’s deportation. The complaint comes after Trump said the arrest of Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil would be the “first of many to come.”

Just this week, ICE agents in Boston sparked outrage after Tufts University PhD student Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish national, was arrested by plainclothes agents outside her apartment Tuesday.

Video obtained by The Associated Press appears to show six people, their faces covered, taking away Ozturk’s phone as she yells and is handcuffed.

The Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not respond to NewsNation’s request for comment on cases involving those claiming to be targeted. They have issued previous statements about the arrests.

NewsNation’s Jeff Arnold and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Related articles

LIVE Bernie Sanders TAX THE RICH Rally in NYC

Status Coup reporter Jon Farina is LIVE...

Fox News Has a Growing Trump Iran War Problem: How to Cover an Unpopular Populist

Fox News isn't cracking on Trump's Iran war — it's changing the subject. But with Trump's polls tanking and gas near $4, that strategy has a shelf life.

The post Fox News Has a Growing Trump Iran War Problem: How to Cover an Unpopular Populist first appeared on Mediaite.

Thievery Corporation @ Buffalo Riverworks

Edit this setlist | More Thievery Corporation setlists The post...

Trump PANICS as F-15 SHOT DOWN IN WAR!!

MeidasTouch reports on the breaking news of...

MAGA county clerk will get new sentence in 2020 election plot



An appeals court tossed out a nine-year sentence for discredited Colorado election clerk Tina Peters.

The Donald Trump ally will be re-sentenced by a district court judge after the Colorado Court of Appeals upheld her conviction but found that Mesa County District Court Judge Matthew Barrett had wrongly based part of his sentence on Peters’ exercise of her right to free speech, reported the Denver Post.

“Notwithstanding the fact that some of the trial court’s considerations were tied to proper sentencing considerations, when the court’s comments are viewed in their totality, it is apparent that the court imposed the lengthy sentence it did because Peters continued to espouse the views that led her to commit these crimes,” the opinion states.

The "tenor" of Barrett's original sentencing order indicates that he "punished" Peters for her persistence in insisting the 2020 election had been fraudulent and that keeping her in prison was necessary to prevent her from espousing views the judge felt were "damaging," and the appeals court sent the case back to him for a resentencing.

The appellate court found there was sufficient evidence to convict Peters and that she was not immune to state prosecution, and the judges also found that a purported pardon from Trump carried no authority under Colorado law.

The court denied Peters' request that a new judge resentence her, saying that issue should be raised in a lower court, and ruled that a prosecutor’s description of her case during closing arguments had no impact on the verdict.

“The evidence of her knowledge of the illegality of her conduct is so overwhelming, we simply cannot say that the prosecutor’s statement (even if improper) had any impact on the verdict, let alone an impact so great as to cause serious doubt about the reliability of the judgment of conviction,” the panel found.

Peters, now 70, was convicted by a Mesa County jury of four felony and three misdemeanor crimes for plotting to sneak unauthorized individuals into a secure area to examine voting equipment to look for evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.