Posse Comitatus Act: Does law allow Trump to send troops to LA?

(NewsNation) — In an attempt to subdue protesters, President Donald Trump has deployed more than 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 active-duty U.S. Marines to Los Angeles.

The moves have drawn backlash from California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has filed a lawsuit against Trump over what he says is an “unlawful” deployment of federal troops to LA County.

Trump cites federal code for sending troops to LA protests

In sending troops to LA, Trump cited Title 10 of the U.S. Code, which allows the president to “call into federal service members and units of the National Guard of any State in such numbers as he considers necessary” when there is a rebellion, an invasion or the danger of either happening.

“Orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States or, in the case of the District of Columbia, through the commanding general of the National Guard of the District of Columbia,” the code reads.

Newsom did not request troops in LA, and the state’s lawsuit says there was neither a “rebellion” nor an “invasion,” nor the possibility of either.

Trump’s federal troop deployment is the first without a governor’s request since the Civil Rights Movement — and a violation of federal code, according to California’s lawsuit.

“I will say, and I know that there are people that disagree with me on this, when I read the federal statute … it does look like a broad grant of authority to me,” Jessica Levinson, a professor at Loyola Marymount University, told NewsNation on Monday.

She said California faces an “uphill battle” in the lawsuit.

Posse Comitatus Act: Does it override Trump’s orders on LA protests?

Enter the Posse Comitatus Act, an 1878 law that forbids the U.S. military from participating in civilian law enforcement on U.S. soil.

Exceptions include enforcement approved by Congress or under circumstances that are “expressly authorized by the Constitution.”

Notably, the Posse Comitatus Act refers only to the Army and Air Force — a different statute, 10 U.S. Code 275, forbids Navy and Marine Corps members from the same thing.

According to the nonprofit Brennan Center for Justice, “members of the National Guard are rarely covered by the Posse Comitatus Act because they usually report to their state or territory’s governor.”

“However, when Guard personnel are called into federal service, or ‘federalized,’ they become part of the federal armed forces, which means they are bound by the Posse Comitatus Act until they are returned to state control,” the center said.

Essentially, the act prevents federal troops from doing anything other than supporting Immigration and Customs Enforcement and protecting government personnel and property.

But there is one notable override: the Insurrection Act.

Will Trump invoke Insurrection Act to quell LA protests?

A more far-reaching law, originally enacted in 1792, could allow Trump to override the Posse Comitatus rule and deploy the U.S. military domestically against Americans.

The Insurrection Act can be invoked to suppress rebellion, violence or enforce the law in certain situations.

“In theory, the Insurrection Act should be used only in a crisis that is truly beyond the capacity of civilian authorities to manage,” the Brennan Center said, adding that the law fails “to adequately define or limit when it may be used.”

“If things escalate over the next 12, 24, 48 hours, we could see the president trying to use his power under the Insurrection Act,” Levinson said.

That would give the National Guard and the military in general much more power because it is an exception to that Posse Comitatus Act,” she said. “You would see the National Guard being able to act, essentially, as ICE agents.”

When asked about invoking the Insurrection Act, Trump told reporters on Sunday, “Depends on whether or not there is an insurrection.”

He has since called protesters “paid insurrectionists” on social media, and on Monday said demonstrators “should be in jail.”

Related articles

‘Pedophile protector!’ Ex-cop gets in Dan Bongino’s face over Epstein probe failures



Former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino was confronted in public Saturday over his handling of the criminal probe into Jeffrey Epstein and potential co-conspirators, with one heckler issuing Bongino an especially brutal nickname, as seen in a clip of the confrontation that went viral on Sunday.

Details of the event Bongino was confronted are sparse, though the conservative news website The Gateway Pundit reported Sunday that it took place Saturday evening. Far-right lawyer and Army veteran Ivan Raiklin also confirmed details of the incident after refuting claims that he had been the one to confront the former FBI deputy director. Bongino has also shared at least 10 posts on social media Sunday morning mocking the group that apparently confronted him.

In the video, an unidentified individual recording the encounter approached Bongino and immediately began insulting the ex-FBI official.

“You’re a pedophile protector!” the individual can be heard shouting. “A pedophile protector, pedophile protector!”

A visibly angry Bongino fired back and could be heard shouting “go volunteer to do something!"

“I was a cop for nine years, you’re a pedophile protector, f-----!” the individual said, using a homophobic slur. “You’re a pedophile protector, f--- you, dude, f--- you!”

Raiklin was initially attributed as having been the one to confront Bongino by several prominent X users, an attribution he refuted several times.

“I wasn't the one who said that nor caused the scene,” Raiklin wrote in a social media post Sunday. “It was some former cop.”

Another clip of the encounter filmed from a different angle – shared by the far-right extremist group Oath Keepers – shows Bongino lashing out at the group, shouting “you didn’t do s—!”

Bongino has faced MAGA outrage in the wake of his resignation from the FBI over his agency’s handling of its probe into Epstein and potential co-conspirators. Despite having hyped up theories around Epstein prior to his role at the agency, he later signed off on a memo that concluded Epstein had died by suicide and that no evidence existed to prosecute potential co-conspirators of Epstein.


Residents to Genesee IDA: Reject data center, tax breaks

Tonawanda Seneca Nation member Grandell Logan addresses the Genesee...

Republicans propose adding anti-trans provisions to SAVE America Act that Trump claimed it already had

The president referred to the proposed ban on trans women in women's sports and gender-affirming surgeries for minors as the "best of Trump."