New York State Senate Joint Public Hearing – 09/30/2025


Senate Standing Committee on Corporations, Authorities, Commissions
Chair: Senator Leroy Comrie
and Senate Standing Committee on Energy and Telecommunications
Chair: Senator Kevin Parker
Public Hearing: Oversight of the Public Service Commission’s processes related to rate case and generic proceedings, and the Department of Public Service’s efforts to implement the goals of the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act
Place: Senate Hearing Room, 250 Broadway, 19th Floor, New York, NY 10007
Time: 10:00 A.M.

SUBJECT: Public Service Commission’s Proceedings

PURPOSE: To conduct oversight of the Public Service Commission’s processes related to rate case and generic proceedings, and to review the Department of Public Service’s efforts to implement and achieve the goals of Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act. The hearing will help garner perspective on how the Commission and the Department can function more effectively.

The Public Service Commission (“PSC”) is the primary regulatory authority charged with oversight of New York’s electric, gas, water, and telecommunication utilities. Under statute, its mission is to ensure safe and reliable service at just and reasonable rates. It conducts formal proceedings to set utility delivery rates and establish rules and regulations for utilities to follow, including rate cases and generic policy matters. The Department of Public Service (“DPS” or “Department”) functions as the staff arm of the PSC and provides technical and legal expertise to support the Commission’s responsibilities.

Together, the Commission and Department also carry out key state policy objectives under the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (“CLCPA”), particularly those tied to utility regulation and energy system planning. Their decisions have a direct impact on how utilities deliver service, customer bills, and the State’s clean energy progress as a whole.

Many stakeholders have raised concerns about how PSC and DPS carry out rate cases and generic policy proceedings. Additionally, while the CLCPA requires all state agencies to factor in climate and equity in major decisions, questions remain about how consistently these mandates are applied in PSC proceedings, including under sections 7(2) and 7(3) of the law.

This hearing will allow the Legislature to examine whether the PSC’s current structure, practices, and priorities align with state law and our green energy objectives. The Committees will explore ways to improve transparency, broaden public participation, and ensure that decisions reflect the needs of all New Yorkers. Through the testimony garnered in this hearing, it is our hope that the Legislature can identify practical reforms to strengthen oversight and support affordability and equity.

Persons wishing to present pertinent testimony to the Corporations, Authorities and Commissions and Energy and Telecommunications Committees at the above hearing should complete and return the enclosed reply form as soon as possible. It is important that the reply form be fully completed and returned so that persons may be notified in the event of emergency postponement or cancellation.

Oral testimony will be limited to 5 minutes duration. Ten copies of any prepared testimony should be submitted at the hearing registration desk. The Corporations, Authorities and Commissions and Energy and Telecommunications Committees would appreciate advance receipt of prepared statements.

Attendees and participants at any legislative public hearing should be aware that these proceedings are video recorded. Their likenesses may be included in any video coverage shown on television or the internet.

In order to meet the needs of those who may have a disability, the Corporations, Authorities and Commissions and Energy and Telecommunications Committees, in accordance with their policy of non-discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), have made their facilities and services available to all individuals with disabilities. For individuals with disabilities, accommodations will be provided, upon reasonable request, to afford such individuals access and admission to State Legislature facilities and activities.
Let New York State Senators hear your voice! Create a nysenate.gov user profile and set custom alerts for issues you care about, comment and vote ‘yea’ or ‘nay’ on bills, and access live streaming and archived Senate videos.

Related articles

Trump gets RUDE AWAKENING as GOP LOSES BIG…IN GEORGIA?!!!

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald...

A reckoning awaits these out-of-touch lawmakers hopelessly in denial



Last month, some House members publicly acknowledged that Israel has been committing genocide in Gaza. It’s a judgment that Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch unequivocally proclaimed a year ago. Israeli human-rights organizations have reached the same conclusion. But such clarity is sparse in Congress.

And no wonder. Genocide denial is needed for continuing to appropriate billions of dollars in weapons to Israel, as most legislators have kept doing. Congress members would find it very difficult to admit that Israeli forces are committing genocide while voting to send them more weaponry.

Three weeks ago, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) introduced a resolution titled “Recognizing the genocide of the Palestinian people in Gaza.” Twenty-one House colleagues, all of them Democrats, signed on as co-sponsors. They account for 10 percent of the Democrats in Congress.

In sharp contrast, a national Quinnipiac Poll found that 77 percent of Democrats “think Israel is committing genocide.” That means there is a 67 percent gap between what the elected Democrats are willing to say and what the people who elected them believe. The huge gap has big implications for the party’s primaries in the midterm elections next year, and then in the race for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination.

One of the likely candidates in that race, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), is speaking out in ways that fit with the overwhelming views of Democratic voters.

“I agree with the UN commission's heartbreaking finding that there is a genocide in Gaza,” he tweeted as autumn began. “What matters is what we do about it – stop military sales that are being used to kill civilians and recognize a Palestinian state.”

Consistent with that position, the California congressman was one of the score of Democrats who signed on as co-sponsors of Tlaib’s resolution the day it was introduced.

In the past, signers of such a resolution would have reason to fear the wrath — and the electoral muscle — of AIPAC, the Israel-can-do-no-wrong lobby. But its intimidation power is waning. AIPAC’s support for Israel does not represent the views of the public, a reality that has begun to dawn on more Democratic officeholders.

“With American support for the Israeli government’s management of the conflict in Gaza undergoing a seismic reversal, and Democratic voters’ support for the Jewish state dropping off steeply, AIPAC is becoming an increasingly toxic brand for some Democrats on Capitol Hill,” the New York Times reported this fall. Notably, “some Democrats who once counted AIPAC among their top donors have in recent weeks refused to take the group’s donations.”

Khanna has become more and more willing to tangle with AIPAC, which is now paying for attack ads against him.

On Thanksgiving, he tweeted about Gaza and accused AIPAC of “asking people to disbelieve what they saw with their own eyes.” Khanna elaborated in a campaign email days ago, writing: “Any politician who caves to special interests on Gaza will never stand up to special interests on corruption, healthcare, housing, or the economy. If we can’t speak with moral clarity when thousands of children are dying, we won’t stand for working Americans when corporate power comes knocking.”

AIPAC isn’t the only well-heeled organization for Israel now struggling with diminished clout. Democratic Majority for Israel, an offshoot of AIPAC that calls itself “an American advocacy group that supports pro-Israel policies within the United States Democratic Party,” is now clearly misnamed. Every bit of recent polling shows that in the interests of accuracy, the organization should change its name to “Democratic Minority for Israel.”

Yet the party’s leadership remains stuck in a bygone era. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), the chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, typifies how disconnected so many party leaders are from the actual views of Democratic voters. Speaking in Brooklyn three months ago, she flatly claimed that “nine out of 10 Democrats are pro-Israel.” She did not attempt to explain how that could be true when more than seven out of 10 Democrats say Israel is guilty of genocide.

The political issue of complicity with genocide will not go away.

Last week, Amnesty International released a detailed statement documenting that “Israeli authorities are still committing genocide against Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip, by continuing to deliberately inflict conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction.” But in Congress, almost every Republican and a large majority of Democrats remain stuck in public denial about Israel’s genocidal policies.

Such denial will be put to the electoral test in Democratic primaries next year, when most incumbents will face an electorate far more morally attuned to Gaza than they are. What easily passes for reasoned judgment and political smarts in Congress will seem more like cluelessness to many Democratic activists and voters who can provide reality checks with their ballots.