Lancaster Supervisor Calls For Apology After Buffalo Police Tie Suburb To Fourth Of July Street Takeover

Lancaster Town Supervisor Bob Leary is calling for a public apology after Buffalo Police officials referenced Lancaster while discussing the chaotic Fourth of July weekend street takeover that left 11 people shot in Buffalo.

The dispute stems from a July 6 Buffalo Police press conference about the violence around East Delavan Avenue, Grider Street, Stevens Avenue and nearby blocks. Buffalo Police Commissioner Erika Shields said the department had been tracking a promoted street party and planned street takeover, and E-District Chief Todd McAlister added that people at the event came from outside the immediate neighborhood, including from areas such as Lancaster.

That comment quickly drew a response from Leary, who told WBEN he was “shocked and appalled” that Lancaster was singled out. Leary said he believes Buffalo officials were deflecting blame and creating division by naming Lancaster without producing evidence that Lancaster residents were responsible for the violence.

WBEN reported that, according to Leary, no one from Lancaster had been arrested in Buffalo during that time period. Leary also argued that suburban communities are dealing with crime spilling out from Buffalo, including stolen vehicles and other incidents, and said he intends to defend the town.

The controversy comes after a violent holiday weekend in Buffalo. Police said 11 people were shot over a two-hour period, with victims ranging in age from 13 to 51. Shields blamed the unrest on an illegal, social-media-promoted event that overwhelmed parts of the East Side and said the city is looking at cease-and-desist and possible legal action against the promoter.

Buffalo Mayor Sean Ryan later said the gathering drew young people from across Erie County and that police identified vehicles from multiple communities, including Lancaster, during their response. Ryan said the city’s message moving forward is that illegal street takeovers will not be tolerated and that parents need to know where their children are going on major holiday weekends.

Still, Lancaster officials say Buffalo’s public comments went too far.

The issue now is whether City Hall or Buffalo Police will clarify the remarks or apologize to Lancaster. As of Wednesday afternoon, local reports had not confirmed that a public apology had been issued.

Why It Matters

The fight over Lancaster’s mention is more than a suburban-vs-city political argument. It raises questions about how police communicate during major incidents, how regional communities are described when violence crosses municipal lines, and whether public officials should name specific towns before arrests or evidence are made public.

For Buffalo, the focus remains on illegal street takeovers, violence prevention and accountability for the organizers. For Lancaster, the concern is reputational: town leaders do not want their community publicly tied to a violent event without proof.

Related articles

Trump Demands an AI Data Center in Every Pot

As many have noted, opposition to AI data centers is one of the very few issues that cuts across political...

Ex-Trump official pinpoints exact moment Trump’s ‘mentality changed’ — for the worse



Joe Kent, the former senior intelligence official who resigned from the Trump administration in protest of the Iran war, made a stunning claim Monday that “something” happened to President Donald Trump that “changed” him from that point forward.

“Something in the late spring, early summer time frame happened – I don’t know what happened,” Kent said during an appearance on the “Julian Dorey Podcast” published on Monday.

“I can’t tell you why his mentality changed, but it went from, ‘we’re gonna create the most space we can for [Iran] negotiations and we’re not interested in the war,’ to, ‘okay, we’re gonna support the Israelis, do Midnight Hammer and we’re gonna continue to entertain this.’”

A key pledge of Trump during his 2024 campaign was that he would not send Americans “to fight and die in stupid foreign wars that never end,” reiterating that promise during his victory speech: “I’m not going to start a war,” he said.

And yet, in late February, Trump launched Operation Epic Fury with a large-scale attack on Iran that months later now risks sparking a broader war.

Kent, who's long championed Trump's anti-interventionist rhetoric, said he was confused by the president's apparent shift, and while he could narrow down roughly when it happened, he still couldn't say what caused it.

“I don’t know what happened. And so for me, when something like that happens, from an intelligence background, you do have to step back and look at what else could be influencing the president,” Kent said.

“Did he just change his mind? For him to go through with [launching the Iran war], ultimately, I do think there’s potentially other factors there: so what could those other factors be? Why would a president make decisions that he doesn’t agree with?”

Other conservative figures have speculated as to why Trump launched a war against Iran despite his frequent anti-war rhetoric, including prominent conservative figure Tucker Carlson, who in April floated a disturbing theory that a “blackmail” operation perpetrated by the Israeli government could potentially have forced the president’s hand.

‘Professional malpractice’: The Platner fallout engulfs the operatives who made him

A string of early missteps, like rejecting an offer for a deeper vetting of Platner, has cast doubt over his young consultants’ future in Democratic politics.