Raw Story
Featured Stories:
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce still didn’t announce pregnancy, despite AI rumors
‘The bell of stupidity’: Conservative’s Christmas video lampoons Trump’s latest speech

President Donald Trump was supposed to prioritize the economy at a MAGA rally last week — but instead rambled about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and other familiar foes.
In a Christmas-themed video, The Lincoln Project's Rick Wilson (a Never Trump conservative former GOP strategist) and journalist Molly Jong-Fast brutally mocked the speech for failing to get the desired economic message across.
Jong-Fast told Wilson, "Let's talk about how positively b----- the whole thing is. It was meant to be a rally on affordability. Here's what was not discussed: affordability. Here's what was discussed: Marjorie Taylor Greene. He calls her Marjorie Traitor Brown."
Wilson, sounding amused, interjected, "And I'm also intrigued by how she's somehow a leftist."
Jong-Fast told the Never Trumper, "It has really been a week for Trump."
Wilson laid out a variety of ways in which Trump and the MAGA movement are having a bad Christmas, from the Epstein files to the economy.
"There is no unringing this bell of stupidity," Wilson told Jong-Fast. "They have f----- it up. They have made a giant mistake."
- YouTube www.youtube.com
Trump Supreme Court battle could be dismantled by Congress members’ own history

New evidence is emerging that could deal a major blow to President Donald Trump's case for stripping birthright citizenship to the children of immigrants.
The president has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to restore “the original meaning” of the 14th Amendment, which his lawyers argued in a brief meant that “children of temporary visitors and illegal aliens are not U.S. citizens by birth," but new research raises questions about what lawmakers intended the amendment to do, reported the New York Times.
"One important tool has been overlooked in determining the meaning of this amendment: the actions that were taken — and not taken — to challenge the qualifications of members of Congress, who must be citizens, around the time the amendment was ratified," wrote Times correspondent Adam Liptak.
A new study will be published next month in The Georgetown Law Journal Online examining the backgrounds of the 584 members who served in Congress from 1865 to 1871. That research found more than a dozen of them might not have been citizens under Trump’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment, but no one challenged their qualifications.
"That is, said Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia and an author of the study, the constitutional equivalent of the dog that did not bark, which provided a crucial clue in a Sherlock Holmes story," Liptak wrote.
The 14th Amendment states that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside," while the Constitution requires members of the House of Representatives to have been citizens for at least seven years, and senators for at least nine.
“If there had been an original understanding that tracked the Trump administration’s executive order,” Frost told Liptak, “at least some of these people would have been challenged.”
Only one of the nine challenges filed against a senator's qualifications in the period around the 14th Amendment's ratification involved the citizenship issue related to Trump's interpretation of birthright citizenship, and that case doesn't support his position.
"Several Democratic senators claimed in 1870 that their new colleague from Mississippi, Hiram Rhodes Revels, the first Black man to serve in Congress, had not been a citizen for the required nine years," Liptak wrote. "They reasoned that the 14th Amendment had overturned Dred Scott, the 1857 Supreme Court decision that denied citizenship to the descendants of enslaved African Americans, just two years earlier and that therefore he would not be eligible for another seven."
"That argument failed," the correspondent added. "No one thought to challenge any other members on the ground that they were born to parents who were not citizens and who had not, under the law in place at the time, filed a declaration of intent to be naturalized."
"The consensus on the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause has long been that everyone born in the United States automatically becomes a citizen with exceptions for those not subject to its jurisdiction, like diplomats and enemy troops," Liptak added.
Frost's research found there were many members of Congress around the time of the ratification of the 14th Amendment who wouldn't have met Trump's definition of a citizen, and she said that fact undercuts the president's arguments.
“If the executive order reflected the original public meaning, which is what the originalists say is relevant,” Frost said, “then somebody — a member of Congress, the opposing party, the losing candidate, a member of the public who had just listened to the ratification debates on the 14th Amendment, somebody — would have raised this.”
‘Likely a plant’: Republicans stand up to controversial Trump ally after ‘racist’ comments

Republicans are standing up to a purportedly racist supporter of Donald Trump as she posts offensive content on his behalf.
Florida activist Laura Loomer, a self-described 'proud Islamophobe' who lost congressional bids in 2020 and 2022, faced staunch criticism Thursday from former Trump aide A.J. Delgado and Sarah Fields, a Republican State Delegate and Precinct Chair in Texas.
"She mocks, calls names and uses vile language… when the best thing for her to do would be to argue the points made against her," Fields wrote in her lengthy, multi-post takedown. "Her behavior, but worst of all, her lies, HARM the Conservative Party."
Fields details Loomer's reported ties — the nature of which the activist contests — to notorious neo-Nazi Nick Fuentes, her anti-Islam rhetoric, efforts to dox her critics, and mass shooting conspiracy theories.
While Fields focuses on the "receipts," it is worth noting several claims are backed up by reporting from established media outlets.
ALSO READ: Mike Johnson's now-deleted Trump social media post sparks controversy
The Daily Beast previously reported on Loomer's mass shooting conspiracy theories, NBC News reported on Loomer's ban from Uber and Lyft over an anti-Muslim rant, and both Rolling Stone and Mother Jones report of a friendship with Fuentes.
But what appears to outrage Fields most is not Loomer's description of herself as a proud Islamaphobe, but as a journalist.
"It is very rare form for her to show receipts or evidence of any of her 'breaking' stories," Fields writes. "And more times than not, her headlines are disproven. She does this so often, it’s time to start asking ourselves if she is doing it on purpose. It could only be for two reasons, to cause chaos and confusion within the party, or for the likes and popularity."
This attack comes as Loomer doubles down on Trump's highly criticized attack on Vice President Kamala Harris in which he tried to challenge her racial identity.
In one such post, Loomer claimed "If Kamala Harris makes it to the White House, Ebonics will replace English as the language of our land."
"Laura Loomer is the worst human on this planet," critic Alex Cole responded.
Such racial attacks appear in Delgado's takedown on X over a post that included Loomer's claim that Trump was "blacker" than Harris because he has a mug shot, sneaker line, and three "baby mamas."
"It's also false that Trump 'lifted the ban on blacks and Jews in PB country clubs.' (I know, bc I parroted this lie myself in 2016, until a Jewish family from PB who lived this informed me otherwise,)" wrote Delgado.
"The fact is that Trump was not admitted into the high-end PB country-clubs (he was considered tacky, same as much of NY old money considered him tacky). So, like a toddler, he threw a fit and started his own club."
Delgado then praised Fields' thread on Loomer but questioned her hypothesis that Loomer was a plant meant to cause conservative chaos.
"Wow, fascinating thread regarding lunatic Laura Loomer (friend of Jason Miller and obsessive-Trump-supporter)," Delgado wrote. "This well-meaning conservative puts forth that Loomer is likely a plant (I don't think she is but she's THAT harmful to her own side, that they are starting to suspect it)."
‘Hmmm’: Trump’s latest brag met with scorn from his own fans

Donald Trump issued an election brag on Wednesday that was met with harsh pushback from his own followers.
Trump took to Truth Social to advertise that one of his endorsed candidates, GOP State Senator Wendy Rogers, prevailed in her primary against a fellow Republican. The Arizona Mirror reports that Rogers "appears to have fended off a primary challenge from David Cook, a fellow GOP legislator, with early results showing her with a solid lead."
On his own social media network, Trump celebrated by posting an image prominently featuring photos of both himself and Rogers.
ALSO READ: Mike Johnson's now-deleted Trump social media post sparks controversy
"Wendy Rogers wins!" the image states. "Endorsed by President Trump."
But the comments on Trump's social posting were overwhelmingly negative from his own supporters.
An account called Tellthetruth, @repentwatchandpray, said, "Hmmm funny how she did nothing about exposing the 2020 election fraud."
Francine62, @Francine62, was even more forceful.
"Wendy is a traitor," the account wrote.
Tony Stringer, @tonyleeds, was surprised Trump would endorse Rogers.
"Don't know why she is endorsed by Trump, she's a traitor and a liar," the account wrote.
Another user, @phnx22, appeared to give both Trump and Rogers the benefit of the doubt.
"Still not 100% on Wendy but congrats," they wrote. "Let's see what happens."
SparklesInTheNight, @sparklesInTheNight, was upset by Rogers' victory.
"Wendy hasn’t done diddly squat for the people!"
Other Trump fans appeared to insult Rogers based on her looks, suggesting she looks like a man.
Ramy_LaBroche, @Ramy_LaBroche, asked, "Wendell Rogers?"
@wjswanson simply stated, "Dude looks like a lady."
‘Um is this a bad thing?’ Fox host’s description of Harris as ‘Obama in a skirt’ backfires

A host on Fox Business on Wednesday described Vice President Kamala Harris as "Obama in a skirt" — and many progressives on Twitter saw absolutely nothing bad about that.
During an interview with Trump campaign spokeswoman Caroline Sunshine, the host asked how the campaign planned to pivot from running against President Joe Biden to running against Harris, who is drawing enthusiastic crowds at packed campaign rallies in a way that Biden never did.
"They are trying to sell her as 'Obama in a skirt,'" the host said. "Basically trying to create momentum around Kamala Harris based on identity politics based on the fact that she's a woman of color and would be the first woman of color president."
Given that former President Barack Obama won presidential elections on two separate occasions, and each time won with more than 50 percent of the vote, many people who watched the exchange wondered if that wouldn't be good marketing.
ALSO READ: Disgraced former Arizona lawmaker trounced in bid to return to the Capitol
"Weird... but then Obama was two terms as president, so what's their point exactly?" asked Talking Points Memo's Josh Marshall.
"Um...Is this meant as a criticism or a bad thing?" asked Chidi Nwatu.
"'Obama in a skirt' should beat the tar out of a crazy old weirdo," argued Greg Cantwell.
"Why do half their attacks on Harris sound like campaign ads for her though?" asked Brian Hiatt.
Progressive activist Dante Atkins corrected Fox Business by noting that Harris typically wore pantsuits, and then added "the fear is palpable."
National security attorney Bradley Moss, meanwhile, watched the segment and felt the need to ask, "Are white, blonde women OK?"
Watch the video below or at this link.
Trump campaign spox trolls Dems: Let’s ‘make America weird again’ www.youtube.com
Snoop Dogg wows crowd at sizzling Olympic beach volleyball venue

US rapper Snoop Dogg entertained the crowds at a sizzling beach volleyball stadium on Wednesday, dancing along with fans after he turned up to support the US women's team.
The rapper arrived at the iconic venue in the shadow of the Eiffel Tower by a side entrance, surrounded by a team of security -- but once in the stands he wasn't shy about showing off his moves.
Posing for photos with a few delighted fans, he shook his hands in the air to a pumped-up crowd that included US supporters dressed as cowboys.
Wearing a T-shirt that read "USA", the rapper sheltered from the sun under an umbrella and clutched an electric pocket fan as temperatures soared into the early 30s, at a stadium with zero shade.
The US players -- Sara Hughes and Kelly Cheng -- waved at him and pointed in his direction as they warmed up on the sand before the game.
The US rapper was on his feet cheering and clapping as Hughes and Cheng fought a tight battle against France, joining spectators in the sport's popular "monster block" chant which makes the temporary stadium shake.
After the US stormed to victory in two sets, the players danced back from the court and thumped their chests in Snoop Dogg's direction.
In return he stood and waved a large US flag in both hands.
Speaking to US channel NBC, he had some advice for the US players: "Do what y'all do," he said. "Bring home the gold."
Hughes and Cheng -- both making their Olympics debut at the Paris Games -- managed to triumph in a tight match against Clemence Vieira and Aline Chamereau, with the second set finishing 23-21.
Wednesday's searing heat marked a sharp contrast to the first day of competition, when relentless driving rain deluged the venue.
The US rapper has also been spotted watching the men's street skateboarding and the artistic gymnastics women's qualification, after he was a torch-bearer in the opening ceremony.
Another US rapper, Flavor Flav, has also been spotted as an enthusiastic follower of Team USA.
Clad in sparkly glasses and enthusiastically brandishing a rugby ball in the air, Flav was at the Stade de France to cheer on the US women's rugby sevens, who won a surprising bronze.
‘Persecuted by this Wack Job!’ Trump makes frantic claims in rambling Truth Social post

Former President Donald Trump is claiming an influential charity whose members are barred from making political endorsements is warning Catholics away from "Crazy Kamala Harris."
Trump wrote on Truth Social Wednesday that the Catholic organization Knights of Columbus was launching a large political campaign against his presumed opponent in the 2024 presidential election.
"A large group of Catholics is launching a major Political Campaign against Crazy Kamala Harris," Trump wrote. "Catholics are literally being persecuted by this Wack Job, just ask the Knights of Columbus."
It is unknown what Trump was basing his claim about a campaign by the group on, but his accusations of persecution was likely referencing a 2018 exchange between Harris and the then-president Trump's nominee for a Nebraska federal court judgeship, Brian Buescher, whose Knights of Columbus membership Harris reportedly questioned.
"Then-Sen. Harris asked him whether he knew that 'the Knights of Columbus opposed a woman’s right to choose when [he] joined the organization,'" Catholic News Agency reports, "and whether he was aware 'that the Knights of Columbus opposed marriage equality when [he] joined the organization.”
On Wednesday, Trump claimed Knights of Columbus was fearful of her ascent to the Oval Office.
"They say that she is the most Anti-Catholic person ever to run for high office in the U.S," Trump wrote. "This respected group wants ALL CATHOLICS TO VOTE AGAINST KAMALA, and they are 100% correct."
Raw Story reached out to the Knights of Columbus via email and telephone but did not receive an immediate response.
A Knights of Columbus document on political activity guidelines instructs members not to endorse candidates or engage in partisan activity in the name of the organization.
ALSO READ: Mike Johnson's now-deleted Trump social media post sparks controversy
Trump's comments echo those he made at a Turning Point USA event Friday during which he invoked panic of Democratic persecution of Catholics.
Harris' campaign responded with a swift rebuttal, accusing Trump of insulting the faith of Catholic Americans.
"He generally sounded like someone you wouldn’t want to sit near at a restaurant," said spokesperson James Singer, "let alone be President of the United States."
Raw Story reached out to Singer on X for comment on Wednesday but did not receive an immediate reply.
Trump's own actions have outraged Catholic voters who decried his decision to sell Bibles and his administration's policies on immigration and the death penalty.
Black journalists plan boycott as Trump prepares to speak at their convention

Members of the National Association of Black Journalists have reportedly planned a boycott as the group agreed to host an event with former President Donald Trump and Fox News host Harris Faulkner Wednesday.
NABJ convention co-chair Karen Attiah announced she would resign after learning about the plans to have a friendly Fox News host moderate Trump at the event in Chicago.
"While my decision was influenced by a variety of factors, I was not involved or consulted with in any way with the decision to platform Trump in such a format," Attiah said.
ABC News Senior Congressional Correspondent Rachel Scott and Semafor Political Reporter Kadia Goba are slated to co-moderate the event.
KXAS reported that other members were expected to boycott. However, NABJ President Ken Lemon defended the decision to host Trump.
"We look forward to our attendees hearing from former President Trump on the critical issues our members and their audiences care about most," Lemon said. "While NABJ does not endorse political candidates as a journalism organization, we understand the serious work of our members, and welcome the opportunity for them to ask the tough questions that will provide the truthful answers Black Americans want and need to know."
In a statement, Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) noted that Trump had repeatedly insulted residents during events in the Midwest.
ALSO READ: Bad news for Trump: Harris will bring the receipts on Dobbs abortion decision
"Every time Donald Trump visits the Midwest he tells us how much he hates it," Pritzker said Tuesday. "He called Milwaukee horrible. He called Detroit corrupt. He denigrated Chicago police. His visit to Chicago tomorrow will no doubt be another attempt to distract from his flailing campaign with as many lies as there are vacancies at Trump Tower."
Popular articles
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce still didn’t announce pregnancy, despite AI rumors
‘The bell of stupidity’: Conservative’s Christmas video lampoons Trump’s latest speech

President Donald Trump was supposed to prioritize the economy at a MAGA rally last week — but instead rambled about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and other familiar foes.
In a Christmas-themed video, The Lincoln Project's Rick Wilson (a Never Trump conservative former GOP strategist) and journalist Molly Jong-Fast brutally mocked the speech for failing to get the desired economic message across.
Jong-Fast told Wilson, "Let's talk about how positively b----- the whole thing is. It was meant to be a rally on affordability. Here's what was not discussed: affordability. Here's what was discussed: Marjorie Taylor Greene. He calls her Marjorie Traitor Brown."
Wilson, sounding amused, interjected, "And I'm also intrigued by how she's somehow a leftist."
Jong-Fast told the Never Trumper, "It has really been a week for Trump."
Wilson laid out a variety of ways in which Trump and the MAGA movement are having a bad Christmas, from the Epstein files to the economy.
"There is no unringing this bell of stupidity," Wilson told Jong-Fast. "They have f----- it up. They have made a giant mistake."
- YouTube www.youtube.com
Trump Supreme Court battle could be dismantled by Congress members’ own history

New evidence is emerging that could deal a major blow to President Donald Trump's case for stripping birthright citizenship to the children of immigrants.
The president has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to restore “the original meaning” of the 14th Amendment, which his lawyers argued in a brief meant that “children of temporary visitors and illegal aliens are not U.S. citizens by birth," but new research raises questions about what lawmakers intended the amendment to do, reported the New York Times.
"One important tool has been overlooked in determining the meaning of this amendment: the actions that were taken — and not taken — to challenge the qualifications of members of Congress, who must be citizens, around the time the amendment was ratified," wrote Times correspondent Adam Liptak.
A new study will be published next month in The Georgetown Law Journal Online examining the backgrounds of the 584 members who served in Congress from 1865 to 1871. That research found more than a dozen of them might not have been citizens under Trump’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment, but no one challenged their qualifications.
"That is, said Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia and an author of the study, the constitutional equivalent of the dog that did not bark, which provided a crucial clue in a Sherlock Holmes story," Liptak wrote.
The 14th Amendment states that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside," while the Constitution requires members of the House of Representatives to have been citizens for at least seven years, and senators for at least nine.
“If there had been an original understanding that tracked the Trump administration’s executive order,” Frost told Liptak, “at least some of these people would have been challenged.”
Only one of the nine challenges filed against a senator's qualifications in the period around the 14th Amendment's ratification involved the citizenship issue related to Trump's interpretation of birthright citizenship, and that case doesn't support his position.
"Several Democratic senators claimed in 1870 that their new colleague from Mississippi, Hiram Rhodes Revels, the first Black man to serve in Congress, had not been a citizen for the required nine years," Liptak wrote. "They reasoned that the 14th Amendment had overturned Dred Scott, the 1857 Supreme Court decision that denied citizenship to the descendants of enslaved African Americans, just two years earlier and that therefore he would not be eligible for another seven."
"That argument failed," the correspondent added. "No one thought to challenge any other members on the ground that they were born to parents who were not citizens and who had not, under the law in place at the time, filed a declaration of intent to be naturalized."
"The consensus on the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause has long been that everyone born in the United States automatically becomes a citizen with exceptions for those not subject to its jurisdiction, like diplomats and enemy troops," Liptak added.
Frost's research found there were many members of Congress around the time of the ratification of the 14th Amendment who wouldn't have met Trump's definition of a citizen, and she said that fact undercuts the president's arguments.
“If the executive order reflected the original public meaning, which is what the originalists say is relevant,” Frost said, “then somebody — a member of Congress, the opposing party, the losing candidate, a member of the public who had just listened to the ratification debates on the 14th Amendment, somebody — would have raised this.”

