Raw Story

Featured Stories:

LIVE: Trump makes an announcement

https://www.youtube.com/embed/Zu5uNjx_rpA

‘Hellbent on hiding truth’: Dem leader pounces as DOJ official hints at holding back files



The top Democrat in the Senate has directly responded to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche after he said that "thousands" of Jeffrey Epstein files would be withheld by the Department of Justice despite a law requiring "all" documents to be released by Friday.

"I expect that we're going to release more documents over the next couple of weeks. So today, several hundred thousand. And then over the next couple weeks, I expect several hundred thousand more," Blanche told Fox News on Friday.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer responded by indicating that Democrats would not stand for the Trump DOJ flouting the law.

"The law Congress passed and President Trump signed was clear as can be - the Trump administration had 30 days to release ALL the Epstein files, not just some. Failing to do so is breaking the law. This just shows the Department of Justice, Donald Trump, and Pam Bondi are hellbent on hiding the truth," Schumer insisted. "Senate Democrats are working closely with attorneys for the victims of Jeffrey Epstein and with outside legal experts to assess what documents are being withheld and what is being covered up by Pam Bondi. We will not stop until the whole truth comes out."

"People want the truth and continue to demand the immediate release of all the Epstein files. This is nothing more than a cover up to protect Donald Trump from his ugly past," he added.

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) suggested that Bondi would be "prosecuted" if the DOJ does not release the full Epstein files on Friday.

JUST IN: Sage Steele Settles Lawsuit With ESPN, Announces She’s Leaving So She Can Exercise Her ‘First Amendment Rights More Freely’

ESPN anchor Sage Steele announced Tuesday that she has reached a settlement in her lawsuit against ESPN and Disney. In the same statement, Steele revealed that will also be leaving the company. “Having successfully settled my case with ESPN/Disney, I have decided to leave so I can exercise my first amendment rights more freely,” Steele […]

The post JUST IN: Sage Steele Settles Lawsuit With ESPN, Announces She’s Leaving So She Can Exercise Her ‘First Amendment Rights More Freely’ first appeared on Mediaite.

How Boris Epshteyn rocketed to the top of Trump world — and how it could crash and burn



Former President Donald Trump's longtime associate Boris Epshteyn may be the mysterious sixth unindicted co-conspirator, argued MSNBC anchor Ari Melber on Monday.

Epshteyn, an attorney, political strategist and former Sinclair Broadcast Group commentator, has admitted to playing a role in the fake electors plot. Separately he is facing new allegations of sexual misconduct. Melber claimed, Epshteyn climbed his way to the top by schmoozing Trump and indulging his every impulse. That is now the same thing that could land him in legal jeopardy.

"When it comes to the secrets to success in Trumpworld ... for Epshteyn, it's no secret anymore," said Melber, who is also an attorney. "It is political loyalty, perhaps even above political acumen. It was his zealous advocacy on TV and his repeated and demonstrated [a] willingness to go where other Trump Republicans won't, to do what other Trump aides will not. That, clearly, catapulted him to the top of the orbit of the most important Republican in the Republican Party right now. Someone who, for all his legal problems, could still be the nominee. And that's all even with the alleged demerits made by colleagues, lawyers, and others around Mr. Epshteyn."

"So, all of that might've gotten him right here," Melber continued. "It might have got him to be among the company of other lawyers, and maybe he got on the right side of that line. Maybe he found a way name-check Giuliani to do some of the bidding, but not be named the co-conspirator. Or maybe the DOJ ultimately will determine things that put them under more legal scrutiny. But it's the tactics, the loyalty, the advocacy, and the perseverance that these individuals have shown that does tie them together."

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

"Mr. Eastman was willing to reverse himself — to lie, if you want to put it blatantly — about what was the law," said Melber. "Mr. Chesebro and Sidney Powell went so far that they had to sometimes deal with people saying, this is, quote, 'wild,' 'unusual,' or as Trump said about Powell's claims, 'crazy.' Mr. Clark and Mr. Eastman ... they've been searched — Mr. Epshteyn's phone was also taken, pursuant to these points — because the DOJ thought those people looked more like co-conspirators."

"The question tonight, and what we've learned about Mr. Epshteyn, is, will he remain so close to the sun that he can no longer provide the kind of defense that Donald Trump so desperately wants and needs, or has he threaded this needle, politically, legally, and otherwise?" Melber added. "All of the former president's people, some of the former president's co-conspirators. Rarely have we seen so much heat around so many people who are someone trying to make the biggest pivot of all. A pivot away from a jail cell and into the Oval Office."

Watch the video below or at the link here.

Ari Melber on Boris Epshteyn www.youtube.com

Sold! Wealthy N.Y. congressman dumps up to $37.1 million in stocks and bonds amid pressure to divest



Freshman Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY), heir to the Levi Strauss fortune and one of Congress’ wealthiest members, has sold tens of millions of dollars worth of personal stocks and bonds, a new federal financial disclosure indicates.

The massive sell-off appears to position Goldman to finally make good on a delayed campaign promise: to create a congressionally approved “qualified blind trust” for his copious assets and shield himself from financial conflicts of interest, be them real or perceived.

Goldman’s office on Monday confirmed to Raw Story that the stock and bond sales are part of the process of entering into a blind trust, which will be finalized “imminently”. Goldman’s office declined further comment.

Under such a “blind trust” arrangement — rare among federal lawmakers — an independent body would formally control the administration of Goldman’s private business dealings, buying and selling investments as it sees fit, without the congressman’s knowledge or input.

Together, Goldman’s stock and bond sales — most executed during mid-July, per his disclosure — are worth up to $37.1 million. The actual value is likely somewhat less than that, as Goldman disclosed the values of his individual sales in broad ranges, as federal law allows.

Among Goldman’s more notable stock sales:

  • Tobacco company British American Tobacco Industries, up to $100,000
  • Tobacco company Altria, up to $30,000
  • Defense contractor Lockheed Martin, up to $50,000
  • Defense contractor BAE Systems, up to $15,000
  • COVID-19 vaccine maker Moderna, up to $100,000
  • Power company Dominion Energy, up to $100,000

Goldman first captured widespread national attention as a Democratic prosecutor during then-President Donald Trump’s first impeachment trial.

As a congressional candidate last year, Goldman, whose New York City-based 10th District includes Wall Street and the New York Stock Exchange, pledged to form a “blind trust” as he ran on an anti-corruption, pro-democracy platform.

“The fact of the matter is I have spent my entire career in public service, taking down gun traffickers, fighting against corrupt individuals, being a strong advocate for anti-corruption, and then obviously being in the trenches protecting and defending our democracy,” Goldman said during an August debate. “So whatever you want to reference, I was in a blind trust with all my money when I was a prosecutor. I will put my money in a blind trust as a congressperson.”

RELATED ARTICLE: ‘Anti-corruption’ Rep. Dan Goldman made hundreds of stock trades after saying he'd create a ‘blind trust’

But during the first several months of Goldman’s congressional tenure, Raw Story chronicled how Goldman continued to buy and sell individual stocks at a frenetic pace through an unnamed investment adviser.

His hundreds of trades placed him among Congress’ most active traders among lawmakers, and Goldman’s office declined to explain why the congressman hasn’t simply abstained from trading while the often protracted process of forming a “qualified blind trust” played out.

Some of the trades involved companies with big business before Congress, including U.S. House committees on which Goldman sits: Homeland Security, Oversight and Accountability and the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government.

“When elected officials are trading stocks at a time when they’re supposed to be overseeing companies, we need to make sure that the public has the faith and confidence that elected officials are doing the bidding of the public interest and not trying to line their pockets and do what’s in their private interest,” Aaron Scherb, senior director of legislative affairs for Common Cause, a nonpartisan government reform organization, said at the time.

Stock-trade ban?

News organizations including the New York Times, Insider, NPR and Sludge have documented rampant financial conflicts of interest among dozens of members of Congress, such as those who bought and sold defense contractor stock while occupying positions on congressional armed services committees or otherwise voting on measures to send such companies billions of federal dollars.

The executive and judicial branches are riddled with similar financial conflict issues, too, as the Wall Street Journal and ProPublica have reported.

Dozens of members of Congress have failed to comply with the STOCK Act. During the 117th Congress from 2021 to 2022, at least 78 members of Congress — Democrats and Republicans alike — were found to have violated the STOCK Act's disclosure provisions, according to a tally maintained by Insider.

And during 2023 alone, Raw Story has so far identified 19 members of Congress who have violated the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act’s public disclosure provisions. The most recent stock trade scofflaw, Rep. Kathy Manning (D-N.C.), is twice tardy, having failed to disclose trades within 45 days of making them.

A plan to enact a congressional stock-trade ban failed during the 2021-2022 congressional session after Democratic House leaders, led by then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), declined to bring any of several existing bills — including one floated by House leaders themselves — up for a vote. President Joe Biden continues to remain silent on the matter, much to the frustration of many government reform groups.

But this year, many Republicans and Democrats alike have renewed efforts to ban their colleagues from trading stocks.

The most recent legislation introduced is the Ban Stock Trading for Government Officials Act, which would prohibit members of Congress, the president, the vice president, senior executive branch officials, their spouses and children from trading stocks and would require greater transparency with financial disclosures, The Hill reported.

Another two-party bill, the Bipartisan Restoring Faith in Government Act was introduced in May and is co-sponsored in part by political rivals in Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Matt Gaetz (R-FL).

Other materially similar bills include the Ending Trading and Holdings in Congressional Stocks (ETHICS) Act, the TRUST in Congress Act and the Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments (PELOSI) Act.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), who does not personally trade stocks, has expressed openness to entertaining a stock trade ban of some sort, but has not formally endorsed a plan.

Goldman spokesperson Simone Kanter previously told Raw Story that Goldman “supports legislation that would prohibit members of Congress from trading individual stocks.”

‘An absolute political prosecution’: Ammon Bundy plays victim card over lawsuit he failed to show up for



Far-right anti-government activist Ammon Bundy appeared in court Monday in connection with a lawsuit he lost after never showing up in court to defend himself.

Bundy was previously at the center of government standoffs in Nevada with his father in 2014 and other allies in Oregon in 2016. He lost a defamation lawsuit earlier this year against an Idaho hospital group he accused of being a child-sex trafficking hub because he refused to attend the trial and mount a defense, The Daily Beast reports.

A jury ordered Bundy and his co-defendants to pay $52 million.

Bundy claims to have just $50,000 but is being sued by the hospital group again for "hiding assets" to shield him from paying out his share of the $52 million jugment, the report said.

During Monday’s hearing, Bundy said that he was “the victim of "an absolute political prosecution" and that St. Luke’s Health Systems was suing him because "because I exposed them."

St. Luke’s employees, in the initial lawsuit, testified that Bundy, among others, including members of the far-right People’s Rights Network, had spread conspiracy theories that put doctors and the hospital at risk.

Bundy was arrested and pleaded guilty to trespassing in connection with a protest that led to the hospital's lockdown.

Kelly Weill writes for The Beast that: "Ironically, Bundy’s Monday court appearance—a first during his St. Luke’s feud—was not legally required. Hearings for temporary restraining orders often take place without the subject of the restraining order, a judge noted."

Bundy was jailed over the weekend until a local sheriff had threats against him.

Read the full article here.

‘It Was All Bullsh*t’: Nicolle Wallace Slams Trump’s Election Claims That Led To Effort To Overturn Georgia Results

Nicolle Wallace joined Jan 6 lead investigator Tim Heaphy in calling Donald Trump's fraud claims that led to efforts to overturn the 2020 election, "bullshit."

The post ‘It Was All Bullsh*t’: Nicolle Wallace Slams Trump’s Election Claims That Led To Effort To Overturn Georgia Results first appeared on Mediaite.

Trump, Allies Seize on Confusion After Georgia Court Shares ‘Fictitious’ Indictment Document

Trump’s legal team and many of his allies seized on the release of what appeared to be an indictment document uploaded and then quickly deleted from Fulton County court’s website

The post Trump, Allies Seize on Confusion After Georgia Court Shares ‘Fictitious’ Indictment Document first appeared on Mediaite.

Popular articles

LIVE: Trump makes an announcement

https://www.youtube.com/embed/Zu5uNjx_rpA

‘Hellbent on hiding truth’: Dem leader pounces as DOJ official hints at holding back files



The top Democrat in the Senate has directly responded to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche after he said that "thousands" of Jeffrey Epstein files would be withheld by the Department of Justice despite a law requiring "all" documents to be released by Friday.

"I expect that we're going to release more documents over the next couple of weeks. So today, several hundred thousand. And then over the next couple weeks, I expect several hundred thousand more," Blanche told Fox News on Friday.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer responded by indicating that Democrats would not stand for the Trump DOJ flouting the law.

"The law Congress passed and President Trump signed was clear as can be - the Trump administration had 30 days to release ALL the Epstein files, not just some. Failing to do so is breaking the law. This just shows the Department of Justice, Donald Trump, and Pam Bondi are hellbent on hiding the truth," Schumer insisted. "Senate Democrats are working closely with attorneys for the victims of Jeffrey Epstein and with outside legal experts to assess what documents are being withheld and what is being covered up by Pam Bondi. We will not stop until the whole truth comes out."

"People want the truth and continue to demand the immediate release of all the Epstein files. This is nothing more than a cover up to protect Donald Trump from his ugly past," he added.

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) suggested that Bondi would be "prosecuted" if the DOJ does not release the full Epstein files on Friday.

‘The brink of illegitimacy’: Professors warn no turning back for ‘noxious’ Supreme Court



Two American university professors Friday warned the "noxious" Supreme Court can no longer be saved.

Harvard law professor Ryan Doerfler and Yale law professor Samuel Moyn wrote an opinion piece published by The Guardian about how the high court's legitimacy has been increasingly damaged under President Donald Trump's second term. Conservative justices have handed Trump and the MAGA movement a number of wins, including overturning of Roe v. Wade, "what remains of the Voting Rights Act," and losing its "nonpartisan image."

The role of the court has shifted and with the conservative majority, the liberal justices had previously "proceeded as if their conservative peers would continue to take their own institution’s legitimacy seriously."

But over the last several months, that has also changed.

"Yet with the conservative justices shattering the Supreme Court’s non-partisan image during Trump’s second term, liberals are not adjusting much," Doerfler and Moyn wrote. "The liberal justices – Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor – have become much more aggressive in their dissents. But they disagree with one another about how far to concede that their conservative colleagues have given up any concern for institutional legitimacy. Encouragingly, Jackson pivoted to 'warning the public that the boat is sinking' – as journalist Jodi Kantor put it in a much-noticed reported piece. Jackson’s fellow liberals, though, did not follow her in this regard, worrying her strategy of pulling the 'fire alarm' was 'diluting' their collective 'impact.'"

By now, Trump has used a "shadow docket" of emergency orders to his advantage and to advance his policies.

"Similarly, many liberal lawyers have focused their criticism on the manner in which the Supreme Court has advanced its noxious agenda – issuing major rulings via the 'shadow' docket, without full-dress lawyering, and leaving out reasoning in support of its decisions," according to the writers.

Critics have argued that the conservative-majority Supreme Court, including Trump's appointees, has used the shadow docket to issue consequential rulings on controversial issues like abortion, voting rights, and immigration with minimal explanation or public deliberation, effectively allowing the court to reshape law through expedited procedures that bypass traditional briefing and oral argument requirements.

Now, "progressives are increasingly converging on the idea of both expanding and 'disempowering' federal courts and looking to see how to shake up the status quo."

"Rather than adhere to the same institutionalist strategies that helped our current crisis, reformers must insist on remaking institutions like the US supreme court so that Americans don’t have to suffer future decades of oligarchy-facilitating rule that makes a parody of the democracy they were promised," Doerfler and Moyn wrote.

"In Trump’s second term, the Republican-appointed majority on the Supreme Court has brought their institution to the brink of illegitimacy. Far from pulling it back from the edge, our goal has to be to push it off," the writers added.