Operation In Our Sites

Logo of ICE[/caption] To mark the official beginning of the online holiday shopping season, known as Cyber Monday, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center (IPR Center), the Department of Justice and the FBI Washington Field Office have seized 150 website domain names that were illegally selling and distributing counterfeit merchandise. “For most, the holidays represent a season of good will and giving, but for these criminals, it’s the season to lure in unsuspecting holiday shoppers,” said ICE Director John Morton. “More and more Americans are doing their holiday shopping online, and they may not realize that purchasing counterfeit goods results in American jobs lost, American business profits stolen and American consumers receiving substandard products. And the ramifications can be even greater because the illicit profits made from these types of illegal ventures often fuel other kinds of organized crime.” “Through this operation we are aggressively targeting those who are selling counterfeit goods for their own personal gain while costing our economy much-needed revenue and jobs,” said Attorney General Eric Holder. “Intellectual property crimes harm businesses and consumers, alike, threatening economic opportunity and financial stability, and today we have sent a clear message that the Department will remain ever vigilant in protecting the public’s economic welfare and public safety through robust intellectual property enforcement.” This operation is the eighth phase of Operation In Our Sites, a sustained law enforcement initiative to protect consumers by targeting counterfeit and piracy on the Internet, and the second year it has coincided with Cyber Monday. These 150 domain name seizures represent a more than 80 percent increase over the 82 websites that were seized during last year’s Cyber Monday-related operation. The 150 seized domains are in the custody of the federal government. Visitors to these websites will now find a seizure banner that notifies them that the domain name has been seized by federal authorities and educates them that willful copyright infringement is a federal crime. During this operation, federal law enforcement agents made undercover purchases of a host of products, including professional sports jerseys, golf equipment, DVD sets, footwear, handbags and sunglasses, representing a variety of trademarks from online retailers who were suspected of selling counterfeit products. In most cases, the goods were shipped directly into the United States from suppliers in other countries. If the trademark holders confirmed that the purchased products were counterfeit or otherwise illegal, seizure orders for the domain names of the websites that sold the goods were obtained from federal magistrate judges. Since the operation’s June 2010 launch, the IPR Center has seized a total of 350 domain names, and the seizure banner has received more than 77 million individual views. Of the 350 domain names seized, 116 have now been forfeited to the U.S. government. The federal forfeiture process affords individuals who have an interest in the seized domain names a period of time after the “Notice of Seizure” to file a petition with a federal court and additional time after the “Notice of Forfeiture” to contest the forfeiture. If no petitions or claims are filed, the domain names become property of the U.S. government. Additionally, a public service announcement (PSA), launched in April 2011, appears on each of the 114 forfeited domain names. This video educates the public about the economic impact of trademark counterfeiting and copyright infringement. Previous website seizures include: First phase: 10 domain names Second phase: 82 domain names — Cyber Monday 2010 Third phase: 10 domain names Fourth phase: 18 domain names Fifth phase: 5 domain names Sixth phase: 17 domain names Seventh phase: 58 domain names The operation was spearheaded by the IPR Center in coordination with the FBI’s Washington Field Office, the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and eight U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, including the Southern District of Texas, Western District of Texas, District of Minnesota, Eastern District of Michigan, Eastern District of Louisiana, District of Maryland and the District of Colorado. The IPR Center is one of the U.S. government’s key weapons in the fight against criminal counterfeiting and piracy. The IPR Center uses the expertise of its 19 member agencies to share information, develop initiatives, coordinate enforcement actions, and conduct investigations related to IP theft. Through this strategic interagency partnership, the IPR Center protects the public’s health and safety, the U.S. economy and the war fighters. To report IP theft or to learn more about the IPR Center, visit www.IPRCenter.gov. The enforcement actions announced today are one of many efforts being undertaken by the Department of Justice Task Force on Intellectual Property (IP Task Force). Attorney General Holder created the IP Task Force to combat the growing number of domestic and international intellectual property crimes, protect the health and safety of American consumers, and safeguard the nation’s economic security against those who seek to profit illegally from American creativity, innovation and hard work. The IP Task Force seeks to strengthen intellectual property rights protection through heightened criminal and civil enforcement, greater coordination among federal, state and local law enforcement partners, and increased focus on international enforcement efforts, including reinforcing relationships with key foreign partners and U.S. industry leaders.

Enhanced by Zemanta
]]>

Related articles

Trump suffers first loss in hush money case minutes after entering courtroom



Judge Juan M. Merchan almost immediately rejected Donald Trump's request for recusal in his hush money trial.

On the first day of court on Monday, Merchan took on Trump's attorneys' motion that the judge recuse from the case. Trump reportedly watch "stone-faced" during the proceedings.

The motion argued that Merchan should recuse himself because his daughter worked for a Democratic consulting firm.

Merchan said Trump's attorneys' motion "does not reasonably or logically” explain why he should be recused.

ALSO READ: 15 worthless things Trump will give you for your money

"To say that these claims are attenuated is an understatement," Merchan said. "There is no basis for recusal."

With that, the judge denied the recusal motion, according to reports.

"Trump appears to be very attentive," CNN's Paula Reid noted.

"Our colleagues say he is looking straight ahead at a screen. Our colleagues also report that he's biting his bottom lip as the judge rejects his motion for recusal."

Trump is accused of falsifying business records to cover up hush money payments to an adult movie star after an alleged affair. He has denied all the allegations made against him.

Meat Raffle to Benefit St. John Kanty/St. Adalbert Parish Community on May 3rd.

On Friday May 3 at the Knights Event Center, 2735 Union Rd, Cheektowaga: Join Saint John Kanty/Saint Adalbert parishioners and friends for Friday Night Fun

‘Confused’ Trump may have accidentally struck a win for American civil liberties: analyst



An ongoing false claim from former President Donald Trump about the Russia investigation may have had the unintended consequence of dismantling a longstanding surveillance program that was a threat to American civil liberties, analyst Hayes Brown wrote for MSNBC on Thursday.

Specifically, Trump's "Spygate" claims that his campaign was illegally snooped on by federal authorities led him to demand the expiration of the wrong statute, and now the passage of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) reauthorization is up in the air as a small group of House Republicans are joining all Democrats to oppose it.

Even a Fox News reporter called him "confused."

"'KILL FISA, IT WAS ILLEGALLY USED AGAINST ME AND MANY OTHERS. THEY SPIED ON MY CAMPAIGN!!!' he wrote on Truth Social, resurrecting one of his long-standing claims about the 2016 election," wrote Brown.

"And the bill being debated didn’t concern all of FISA, just Section 702. But Trump’s post was enough to bolster a revolt among conservative Republicans, 19 of whom voted with Democrats to block the reauthorization bill from coming up for debate.

"For once, though, the GOP’s disarray and obedience to Trump fortuitously may be put to good use. While Trump’s 'Spygate' narrative remains false, it may be harnessed to improve a broken part of America’s intelligence-gathering system."

The problem with Section 702, Brown explained, is a program that allows warrantless surveillance of foreigners living abroad, a once-secret program that was formally authorized in 2008. The law is not intended to apply to Americans, yet American data has been repeatedly caught up in the dragnet.

ALSO READ: No, Donald Trump, fraud is not protected by the First Amendment

Trump's claims that FISA was used to unlawfully spy on his campaign are false, Brown reiterated, and he has flip-flopped on the issue before, previously demanding it expire in 2018 before Republican lawmakers and his cabinet talked him out of it — but this time, things appear to be going differently.

"While Trump’s post rallied conservative opponents to the bill, it’s striking that the rule that was voted down Wednesday managed to get out of committee only because of a proposed bipartisan amendment to the reauthorization bill. The list of co-sponsors is one that you’d never expect to see grouped together, ranging from committed progressives to MAGA die-hards: Reps. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz.; Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash.; Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y.; Warren Davidson, R-Ohio; Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif.; and Jim Jordan, R-Ohio," wrote Brown. "Their proposed change would block 'warrantless searches of U.S. person communications in the FISA 702 database, with exceptions for imminent threats to life or bodily harm, consent searches, or known cybersecurity threat signatures.'"

Ultimately, Brown concluded, "it’s clear that Section 702 isn’t likely to be extended in full without at least some major changes" — and while "Trump’s delusions about the 'deep state' are usually best treated as the ramblings of someone upset that his authoritarian instincts are being trampled ... his ranting might legitimately help safeguard Americans’ rights" in this case.

CNN’s Elie Honig Compares Trump to a ‘Child’ While Advising Alvin Bragg to Go After Him for Violating Gag Order

Elie Honig compared Donald Trump to a "child" while advising Alvin Bragg to urge Judge Juan Merchan to rebuke Trump for violating his gag order.

The post CNN’s Elie Honig Compares Trump to a ‘Child’ While Advising Alvin Bragg to Go After Him for Violating Gag Order first appeared on Mediaite.