Seneca President Testifies on House Land Rights Bill

Tribal sovereignty: Map of the United States, ...[/caption] Seneca Nation President Robert Odawi Porter today testified in favor of the American Indian Empowerment Act of 2011, a bill in Congress designed to empower Indian nations and tribes to accept restricted fee tribal lands. H.R. 3532 was introduced Nov. 30, 2011 by Rep. Don Young, R-Alaska and Rep. Dan Boren, D-Oklahoma. President Porter testified about it today in Washington, DC before the Committee on Natural Resources and the House Subcommittee on Indian and Alaska Native Affairs. “The bill would remove the obstacles to economic development that are inherent in the federal trusteeship,” Porter told the committee. “It would authorize other Indian tribes to follow the path taken by the Seneca Nation and restore to other Indian tribes the basic attributes of territorial sovereignty over their own land.” This bill would allow Indian tribes to voluntarily move tribal trust lands into federally protected restricted fee status; eliminate the burdensome federal review process before an Indian tribe can lease or grant easements or rights of way in such restricted fee lands; and clarify that tribal law preempts federal law with respect to use of tribal restricted fee lands. The bill would significantly enhance tribal self-determination and self-governance by removing the unnecessary federal review processes and restrictions that often stifle economic development opportunities in Indian country. Restricted fee is land ownership status in which the owner holds title to and control of the property and the owner may make decisions about land use, but there are specific government-imposed restrictions on taxation of the land and the owner’s ability to sell the land to third parties. The title for trust land is held by the federal government for the benefit of an individual Indian or a tribe. Day-to-day use of such land is subject to a myriad of administrative restrictions on usage. “Territorial sovereignty – the right to determine what happens with our own land – is an essential element of tribal sovereignty,” President Porter said. “It diminishes tribal powers and inhibits tribal empowerment when federal law allows other governments run by other people to tell a tribal government what the tribal government can and cannot do with the tribal government’s own land. “This is true whether the ‘trustee’ is great and careful, or awful and sloppy. Either way, when a trustee is holding title to your land, and must approve everything you seek to do with your property, you as the beneficiary are removed from responsibility, but also deprived of the ability to react swiftly.” The bill would require the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to an Indian tribe in restricted fee status the title to land the United States currently holds in trust status within 180 days of formal notice. Restricted fee land, once conveyed, would continue to remain subject to restrictions imposed by the United States against alienation and state taxation. Such restricted fee lands are and remain “Indian country” for purposes of other existing laws covering the 565 federally recognized Indian nations and tribes. The bill would confirm an Indian tribe’s right to lease or grant easements or rights of way across its restricted fee lands for any duration without review or approval by the Secretary of the Interior, notwithstanding the provisions of other applicable laws.

]]>

Related articles

‘Republicans’ worst nightmare’: Analyst warns ‘drunk with power’ GOP it’s made a stumble



An analyst warns Thursday that GOP lawmakers "drunk with power" have made a major stumble amid the ongoing government shutdown, unleashing "Republicans' worst nightmare."

Salon columnist Heather Digby Parton writes about how Obamacare premiums are set to soar — something President Donald Trump had promised to replace — and now "appears to be one step too far" for Americans.

"Ten years of similar promises have shown that replacing the Affordable Care Act wasn’t so easy after all — and that the only health care plan the GOP ever truly wanted was one called 'you’re on your own,'" Digby Parton writes.

Republicans haven't introduced any alternatives, instead people are receiving notices that their healthcare premiums are set to rise, while they cut Medicaid and close a number of rural hospitals, add work requirements and deny care to millions. And although they've pointed to Project 2025, aiming to force people into a privatized version of Medicaid and "plan to open up the market to sell junk insurance plans which are worth virtually nothing," it's still a half-baked policy, the writer argues.

"But the GOP’s lack of strategy and success makes it clear the party is as flummoxed on this issue as they’ve always been, and they know it’s a loser for them," she writes.

Healthcare matters for Americans because it's something that effects their daily lives, she adds, and "it’s now on the front lines of this massive war against our social safety net."

As the Trump administration works to defund scientific research and following "the government's shambolic response during the first year of the pandemic and the damage being done every day by the administration to our scientific research community, I suspect a lot of people are feeling insecure about their actual health care these days."

That could leave room for Democrats to step in and hold the line.

"If Democrats can find the fortitude to hold out for their demands, they will have taken the first step in reining in this lawless administration and given the American people something to hold onto in these dark days," Digby Parton writes.

A Shortlist of Federal Data the Trump Administration Has Tampered With or Destroyed

The scale and scope of federal data and statistics that have been completely removed or otherwise compromised by President Donald...

‘Disappointed’: Analyst says public rejecting Trump’s ‘demonstrably absurd’ economy claims



The public is rejecting President Donald Trump's "make-believe" approach to the current economy — and he's "going to be disappointed," according to a new report.

Americans are not convinced by the president's claims of an "economic renaissance," Steve Benen, producer for "The Rachel Maddow Show" writes on the MaddowBlog Friday.

In his post, Benen points to the results from the CBS News/YouGov poll released this week that reports 60% of Americans disapprove of Donald Trump’s handling of the economy, as 51% say the president's economic agenda has left them worse off. Other polls and surveys indicate a similar tone, he adds.

"And yet, he acts as if he can bully Americans’ economic attitudes into submission through constant, reality-defying repetition," Benen writes.

During his White House cabinet meeting this week, Trump said "we have the best economy we've ever had."

Benen argues that things are not good — and 22 states could be heading to recession and economic downturn following the Trump tariff policies and aggressive immigration tactics, according to a new report this week from Axios.

"The idea that Trump, during his first term, delivered the greatest economy ever seen by human eyes is demonstrably absurd," Benen writes. "But the idea that our current economy has reached heights without precedent in the history of the United States is every bit as ridiculous."

The White House might not want to hear it, he adds, but Americans aren't happy.

"I don’t know whether Trump has genuinely convinced himself that Americans now have 'the best economy we’ve ever had,' or whether he was just peddling the latest in a series of lies. Either way, if he thinks such nonsense is persuading a frustrated public, he’s going to be disappointed," he writes.