Putting legislative pay raises in perspective

Updated: 11:18 a.m.

State legislators were generous with themselves beyond the $32,000 a year raise they approved last month. The legislation also included loopholes that good government groups are characterizing as weak on ethics and conflicts of interest.

What’s more, the raises, justified by supporters as compensation for inflation, far exceed increases in the cost of living.

Reinvent Albany compared the provisions of the legislation with recommendations made in 2018 by a state compensation commission that considered pay raises for legislators, among other state elected officials.

“The bottom line is that the law giving the Legislature a huge pay raise includes very weak controls on conflict of interest and leaves massive loopholes for ‘family businesses’ and fiduciary business relationships that invite pay-to-play,” Reinvent Albany said in a statement issued Wednesday.

John Kaehny, its executive director, added: “The Legislature helps oversee about $300 billion in state spending. They should be paid as professionals, which also means being held to professional ethical standards.

“We heard way too much whining about how limits on outside income would be so unfair. Boo hoo,” he continued,” “New York legislators should serve one boss – the public.”

Blair Horner, executive director of the New York Public Interest Research Group, described as “weak” the ethical safeguards built into the legislation. He also criticized the continued allowance for legislators to earn outside income, albeit with some limits.

“What they approved is no where near as restrictive as the Congressional limits on outside income,” he said.

Legislative pay has increased dramatically since 1998. Lawmakers had been paid  $57,500 annually to that point. The salary jumped to $79,500 in 1999, then to $110,000 in 2019. 

The latest raise, approved Dec. 22, boosted pay to $142,000, making New York legislators the highest paid in the nation, surpassing California ($119,000).

As of last year, most state’s paid their legislators less than $50,000 a year; the annual salary in New Hampshire is only $100.



Supporters said the latest raise was intended to compensate for the higher cost of living. The series of raises since 1998 far outstrip inflation, however. The salary of $57,500 then would be worth $97,122 in today’s dollars.

The legislation did, however, place limits for the first time on how much lawmakers can make from other jobs, with numerous exceptions. 

Critics maintained the raises were excessive and that the legislation did not sufficiently address concerns about outside income, ethics and conflicts of interest. The Legislature has been rocked by a number of scandals which resulted in the convictions, among others, of former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and Senate President Joseph Bruno.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter


Gov. Kathy Hochul signed the legislation into law after the Senate and Assembly approved it, largely along party lines, with Democrats supporting and Republicans opposing.

Sen. Tim Kennedy was among a handful of Democrats who broke ranks and voted against the raise. Likewise, Crystal Peoples-Stokes, the Assembly’s deputy speaker, also voted no.

The roll call vote in the Senate is here, that of the Assembly here.

The post Putting legislative pay raises in perspective appeared first on Investigative Post.

Related articles

Even After Trump’s Wild Threats, House GOP Blocks Dems From Voting on Iran War

House Democrats on Thursday tried to rein in the Trump administration’s unauthorized Iran war while the House is on its...

Conservative Supreme Court Justices could face impeachment as Dems plan next move



Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner, running against Republican Susan Collins in Maine, called for Democrats to exercise ethics oversight of the Supreme Court and pursue impeachment of justices if they retake the Senate.

Platner argued in front of a crowed, if Supreme Court justices faced the same ethical standards as lower court judges, "there is a compelling case for the impeachment and removal of at least two," likely referencing Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.

According to a ProPublica report, Thomas accepted undisclosed luxury gifts from GOP megadonor Harlan Crow, while Alito took luxury trips with hedge fund billionaire Paul Singer tied to entities opposing Biden's student loan forgiveness. Alito also faced scrutiny over a Christian nationalism flag displayed at his residence.

Platner additionally supports expanding the Court's size with a simple majority vote if Democrats control the White House and Senate, arguing Democrats must elect senators willing to "wield power" effectively.

Democrats are projected to retake the House of Representatives and have gained popularity in the Senate, where Platner's win could impact the Supreme Court.

Watch the video below.