‘Heckling’ at State of the Union Addresses

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene yells during President Joe Biden's State of the Union address.

A day after several Republicans interrupted President Joe Biden’s second State of the Union address with loud jeering, a Democratic leader said he couldn’t “remember a Democrat ever heckling a president in a State of the Union.” But the Democrats have voiced displeasure with a Republican president at such events on several occasions, dating to at least 2005.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene yells during President Joe Biden’s State of the Union address on Feb. 7, 2023. Photo by Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images.

“I don’t remember a Democrat ever heckling a president in a State of the Union or any other matter,” Rep. Jim Clyburn told CNN’s Don Lemon in a Feb. 8 interview. The South Carolina Democrat continued: “We may show disassociation with, unappreciated-ness of. We may do it with a smile or not smile, facial expressions. I’ll sometimes do it with my head … bow my head to pray, and I sometimes shake my head to say I don’t agree. But to heckle, I mean, that’s not the way adults act. You let the president have his say. You show your disapproval, but you don’t heckle.”

Clyburn may not consider it heckling, but there have been times when Democrats did not just disagree with a Republican president in silence. We will leave it to readers to decide how the following examples compare to what some Republican lawmakers did during Biden’s address this year.

2020

One of the most notable interruptions by Democrats came during then-President Donald Trump’s last State of the Union address in 2020, when he talked about wanting to sign legislation to lower the price of prescription drugs.

“I’ve been speaking to Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and others in Congress in order to get something on drug pricing done, and done quickly and properly,” Trump said. “I’m calling for bipartisan legislation that achieves the goal of dramatically lowering prescription drug prices. Get a bill on my desk, and I will sign it into law immediately.”

After Trump finished making his request, several Democrats stood, held up three fingers, and repeatedly chanted “H.R. 3!” — a reference to the Elijah E. Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act. That bill, named for the late Democratic congressman, passed in the Democratic-controlled House in December 2019 but died in the Republican-led Senate.

Trump raised his voice to drown out the chanting and continue his speech.

In addition, the Hill reported that “a handful of Democrats walked out” during Trump’s 2020 address. One of them, then-Rep. Tim Ryan of Ohio, tweeted that he’d “had enough” of Trump’s speech, which he called “fake” and compared to professional wrestling.

This was also the year that then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was caught on camera tearing up her copy of Trump’s speech as he was concluding his remarks.

2019

A number of Democrats appeared to lightly boo Trump during his 2019 address as he talked about migrants who were headed for the country’s southern border.

“Large, organized caravans are on the march to the United States,” Trump said.

The Hill reported: “The rhetoric earned him groans from Democrats in the House chamber, who have accused Trump of using the caravans to stir up the Republican base.”

The groaning, which was brief, subsided after Pelosi, who was seated behind Trump, raised her hand as an apparent signal for Democrats to quiet down.

2018

There also was booing in 2018, when Trump talked about wanting to limit an immigration program that allows U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents, or green-card holders, to sponsor family members for permanent U.S. residency.

NBC News reported: “The president’s comments on immigration proved the most controversial, prompting boos and groans from Democrats, many of whom had invited ‘Dreamers,’ the children of undocumented immigrants, to attend the speech as their guests.”

The article noted that “as Trump slammed ‘open borders’ and ‘chain migration,’” then-Rep. Joe Crowley, a high-ranking Democrat, “was heard saying, ‘Oh, come on!’ while others gestured in disgust.”

Insider also reported that “at least one member of Congress shout[ed] ‘that’s not true,’ when the president outlined his proposed cuts to legal immigration.”

2005

In a 2009 blog post about GOP Rep. Joe Wilson’s notorious “You lie!” moment during former President Barack Obama’s first address to a joint session of Congress, Politico reported: “In 2005, Dems howled, hissed and shouted ‘No!’” when then-President George W. Bush “pushed for Social Security reform” during that year’s speech.

The Politico post included a quote from then-CNN political analyst Bill Schneider, who called the outbursts during Bush’s 2005 speech “unusual.”

“I had never heard it at least at that level before. The Democrats clearly were booing, heckling, saying ‘no’ when the president talked about the crisis in Social Security,” Schneider said, according to a CNN transcript of his commentary.

A February 2005 National Journal report also said that “Democrats broke decorum” by booing Bush twice.


Editor’s note: FactCheck.org does not accept advertising. We rely on grants and individual donations from people like you. Please consider a donation. Credit card donations may be made through our “Donate” page. If you prefer to give by check, send to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, 202 S. 36th St., Philadelphia, PA 19104. 

The post ‘Heckling’ at State of the Union Addresses appeared first on FactCheck.org.

Related articles

Where the Bands Are: This Week in Live Music and Concert News

Exciting reopenings, returns, and reconfigurations in Clubland have potential...

Marjorie Taylor Greene calls for government ‘overthrow’: ‘It rapes you every single day’



Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) suggested that "forgotten" Americans should "overthrow" the government.

During a Wednesday interview with a podcaster named Shipwreck, Greene said the American people "have forgotten their power."

"I call them the forgotten American man and woman," she explained. "That is the largest group of Americans. And I think, in my opinion, that is the most powerful group of Americans."

"They could rein in their government like that. Not only could they rein it in, they could overthrow it," she remarked. "That's about 100 million Americans, right?"

"Let's say 100 million Americans that say, f-- you to the government and refuse to pay their taxes. This is how to do it."

Greene insisted that "the federal government has [screwed] you over."

"It rapes you every single day," she insisted. "Social Security, you pay in and your Social Security check, and your employer matches it for all these years, and you retire and you get like a diddly $1,500 a month. I mean, that is such a pathetic joke."

"So when I tell you, look, I am dead serious about the American people," the lawmaker added. "If they really wanted to, everybody I work with, all of my colleagues, everybody in the government, they would be terrified to talk to a lobbyist or talk to a foreign government or they would be terrified to, to step out of line if the American people got serious about forcing Congress and the Senate and the administration, no matter who's serving, to serve them, serve the people."

Extreme new Trump admin rules threaten to shutter even more hospitals



A pair of extreme new Trump administration rules aimed at functionally banning gender-affirming healthcare for transgender youth could force even more hospitals to close down.

NPR reported Thursday that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) drafted a proposed rule that would prohibit federal Medicaid reimbursement for medical care provided to transgender patients younger than 18 and prohibit the same from the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) for patients under 19.

Another proposed rule goes even further, blocking all Medicaid and Medicare funding to hospitals that provide gender-affirming care to youth.

As Erin Reed, an independent journalist who reports on LGBTQ+ rights, explained, this “would effectively eliminate access to such care nationwide, except at the few private clinics able to forgo Medicaid entirely, a rarity in transgender youth medicine.”

The policies are of a piece with the Trump administration and the broader Republican Party’s efforts to eliminate transgender healthcare for youth across the country.

Bans on gender-affirming care for those under 18 have already been passed in 27 states, despite evidence that early access to treatments like puberty blockers and hormones can save lives.

As Reed pointed out, a Cornell University review of more than 51 studies shows that access to such care dramatically reduces the risk of suicide and the rates of anxiety and depression among transgender adolescents.

The new HHS rules are being prepared for public release in November and would not be finalized for several more months.

But if passed, the ramifications could extend far beyond transgender people, impacting the entire healthcare system, for which federal funding from Medicare and Medicaid is a load-bearing piece. According to a report last year from the American Hospital Association, 96% of hospitals in the US have more than half their inpatient days paid for by Medicare and Medicaid.

It is already becoming apparent what happens when even some of that funding is taken away. As a result of the massive GOP budget law passed in July, an estimated $1 trillion is expected to be cut from Medicaid over the next decade. According to an analysis released Thursday by Protect Our Care, which maintains a Hospital Crisis Watch database, more than 500 healthcare providers across the country are already at risk of shutting down due to the budget cuts.

Tyler Hack, the executive director of the Christopher Street Project, a transgender rights organization, said that the newly proposed HHS rule would be “forcing hospitals to choose between providing lifesaving care for trans people or maintaining the ability to serve patients through Medicare and Medicaid.”

“Today’s news marks a dangerous overreach by the executive branch, pitting trans people, low-income families, disabled people, and seniors against each other and making hospitals choose which vulnerable populations to serve,” Hack said. “If these rules become law, it will kill people.”