Posts Spread Unfounded Claims About Russia’s Use of COVID-19 Vaccines

SciCheck Digest

Russia developed a COVID-19 vaccine, Sputnik V, in 2020. President Vladimir Putin has said he received three doses of the vaccine, and the government continues to urge Russians to get vaccinated against the disease. But social media posts falsely claimed Putin “ordered the destruction of all” COVID-19 vaccine stockpiles in Russia.


Full Story

Russia was quick to develop its own COVID-19 vaccine — named Sputnik V — and begin administering first doses to Russians in late 2020.

Russia then used Sputnik V as a tool of diplomacy, signing agreements to distribute 700 million doses globally. The Kremlin and the Russian Direct Investment Fund charged with promoting the vaccines decided to pursue commercial deals for the vaccine with 69 countries to use Sputnik V instead of the larger COVAX distribution program created by the World Health Organization.

But Russia ran into numerous setbacks both domestically and globally. Russian citizens had a deep distrust of Sputnik V, prolonging the rollout of the vaccine, along with larger cultural anti-vaccine sentiment. Globally, Russia struggled to keep its promise of distributing 700 million vaccination doses, exporting only 108 million doses, as of June.

Russian President Vladimir Putin endorsed the Sputnik V vaccine. “I know it has proven efficient and forms a stable immunity,” he said in August 2020

Addressing the State Duma, Russia’s lower house of the Federal Assembly, in October 2021, Putin said, “You know that the number of infections is growing in many regions and medical specialists are working in difficult conditions. We all know well that the vaccination can save us from the virus and from a severe course of the disease. It is necessary to step up the vaccination pace.” 

Because of low vaccination rates, numerous Russia regions introduced mandatory vaccinations in 2021 for some public sector workers and people over 60 years old.

Putin said in November 2021 that he had received three Sputnik V doses, plus an experimental nasal spray, in hopes of increasing vaccination rates in the country. 

Currently, nearly 55% of the Russian population is fully vaccinated, with 61% receiving at least one dose.

Despite the efforts to encourage vaccination in Russia, a March 4 article in Real Raw News falsely claimed that Putin had “ordered the destruction of all Covid-19 vaccine stockpiles on Russian soil.” The article falsely claimed that the order was based on a “connection” between the vaccine and a “sudden surge” of HIV infections. 

Real Raw News has a disclaimer on its “about us” page stating, “This website contains humor, parody, and satire.” But there is no such disclaimer on the online article.

There is no evidence that any COVID-19 vaccine or the virus itself has caused HIV, as we’ve previously written. Russia does have a rising HIV infection rate, but that is part of a larger five-year trend unrelated to COVID-19 vaccinations. 

An Instagram post made similar claims, while also referring to the strangulation of a Russian scientist and co-creator of Sputnik V, Andrey Botikov. The Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation looking into Botikov’s death reportedly said it had a suspect in custody.

There is no evidence to suggest that Putin ordered the destruction of COVID-19 vaccine stockpiles. To the contrary, the Russian Ministry of Health said on Telegram on March 5 that it had replenished supplies of Sputnik V following shortages.

The health ministry’s post, which appeared a day after publication of the Real Raw News article, also touted Sputnik V as effective against severe COVID-19 and death, especially for those over the age of 60.

According to the Associated Press, the Russian health ministry said, “Batches of the Sputnik V vaccine have been distributed by the Ministry of Health and have already been sent by the supplier to the city of Moscow and a number of other regions that have reported a decrease in vaccine stockpiles.”  

In a March 13 email to FactCheck.org, Xenia Cherkaev, a postdoctoral fellow in social anthropology at the Higher School of Economics in St. Petersburg, told us that there were numerous articles in Russian media about the recent resupplies of COVID-19 vaccines.

Cherkaev said she found no mention of a demand to destroy vaccines. 

On the question of vaccine hesitancy among Russians, “People are still urged to be vaccinated, COVID is still recognized to be a problem (although it pales now, against the background of the so-called ‘special military operation’),” Cherkaev said, referring to the war in Ukraine.


Editor’s note: SciCheck’s articles correcting health misinformation are made possible by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The foundation has no control over FactCheck.org’s editorial decisions, and the views expressed in our articles do not necessarily reflect the views of the foundation.

Sources

Associated Press. “Russia is replenishing COVID-19 vaccines, not destroying them.” 8 Mar 2023.

Baraniuk, Chris. “Covid-19: What do we know about Sputnik V and other Russian vaccines?” The BMJ. 19 Mar 2021.

Baxter, Michael. “Putin Orders Destruction of All Covid-19 Vaccines in Russia.” Real Raw News. 3 Mar 2023.

Borrell, Josep. “Vaccinating the world: between promises and reality.” European Union External Action. 19 Jun 2022.

Cherkaev, Xenia. Email to Factcheck.org. Postdoctoral fellow at the Higher School of Economics in St. Petersburg, Russia. 13 Mar 2022. 

Fraser, Terrence. “No, COVID-19 vaccines don’t cause HIV, AIDS or cancer.” AP News. 2 Nov 2021. 

Ibrahim, Noor. “Russian COVID Vaccine Creator Found Strangled to Death With Belt.” Yahoo! News. 3 Mar 2023.

Isachenkov, Vladimir and Daria Litvinova. “Scientists uneasy as Russia approves 1st coronavirus vaccine.” AP News. 11 Aug 2020.

Ivanova, Polina and Polina Nikolskaya. “Big promises, few doses: why Russia’s struggling to make Sputnik V doses.” Reuters. 14 May 2021. 

Jones, Ian and Polly Roy. “Sputnik V COVID-19 vaccine candidate appears safe and effective.” The Lancet. 2 Feb 2021.

Kier, Grace and Paul Stronski. “Russia’s Vaccine Diplomacy Is Mostly Smoke and Mirrors.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.” 3 Aug 2021. 

McDonald, Jessica. “Baseless Conspiracy Theories Claim New Coronavirus Was Bioengineered.” Updated 29 Jun 2021.

Our World in Data. COVID-19 Data Explorer. Russia. “Share of people who completed the initial COVID-19 vaccination protocol.” Accessed 14 Mar 2023.

Pape, Ulle. “The Silence Epidemic: Why Does Russia Fail to Address HIV?” Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. 31 Jan 2022. 

Moscow Times. “Putin Says He Took Nasal Spray Covid Vaccine.” 25 Nov 2021. 

@rightside_optics. “Soon the west will do the same.” Instagram. 6 Mar 2023.

Russian Ministry of Health. “Russian Ministry of Health sent shipments of Sputnik V vaccine…” Telegram. 5 Mar 2023.

Schneider-Kamp, Anna. “COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Denmark and Russia: A qualitative typology at the nexus of agency and health capital.” SSM Qual Res Health. 2 Dec 2022.

Twigg, Judy. “Why Aren’t Russians Getting Vaccinated?” Think Global Health. 26 July 2021. 

Ullah, Zahra and Katharina Krebs. “Putin says Russia needs to speed up vaccination for Covid-19.” CNN. 13 Oct 2021.

World Health Organization. COVAX. Accessed 13 Mar 2023.

The post Posts Spread Unfounded Claims About Russia’s Use of COVID-19 Vaccines appeared first on FactCheck.org.

Related articles

Trump LOSES IT over WAR DRAFT!!!

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Trump...

This terrifying Trump plot to steal elections is already underway



Recently, Steve Bannon told an audience:

“And I will tell you right now, as God is my witness, if we lose the midterms … some in this room are going to prison — myself included.”

Now, it looks like Donald Trump and the people around him are seriously considering declaring an emergency to let them seize control of this November’s elections, according to reporting in the Washington Post:

“Pro-Trump activists who say they are in coordination with the White House are circulating a 17-page draft executive order that claims China interfered in the 2020 election as a basis to declare a national emergency that would unlock extraordinary presidential power over voting.”

Trump and the lickspittles and criminals he’s surrounded himself with are in a panic. If Democrats take the House and/or Senate in this November’s elections, they’ll have the power of subpoena so the regime’s crimes and corruption will be laid out for everybody to see. Some could even go to prison, including Trump himself.

He’s been basically screaming, “Do something!!!” at Republicans for the past year. It started publicly with his demanding that Texas and then other red states further gerrymander their elections to reduce the number of Democrats in the House.

In red states they’re purging voters in Blue cities from the rolls like there’s no tomorrow, and the GOP is trying to recruit “election observers” to challenge signatures on mail-in ballots on an industrial level. As reporter Greg Palast pointed out, this is how Trump took the White House in 2024; if it hadn’t been for over 4 million (mostly Black) fully qualified US citizens being purged or having their ballots rejected after technical challenges, Kamala Harris would be our president today.

But given how badly Trump’s doing in the polls today, even all these efforts don’t look like they’ll be enough to keep the House and Senate in Republican hands.

So now Trump toadies like Jerome Corsi (the creator of the Birther movement and the Swift Boat slurs, who’s been a guest on my program multiple times) have an idea: just imitate what Putin, Orbán, Hitler, and other dictators have done to hang onto power when they get unpopular: declare an emergency and use it to rig the election.

Yesterday, the Post detailed how MAGA-aligned activists are now openly discussing manufacturing or exaggerating a national emergency to justify Trump’s agents in the federal government to interfere in this November’s elections.

These aren’t fringe anonymous trolls on some obscure message board; they’re people operating in proximity to the president of the United States. Corsi arguably destroyed John Kerry’s chances in 2004 and lit the Birther fuse that catapulted Trump into political fame.

And they’re floating the idea that if normal democratic processes don’t produce the “right” outcome, they could help create a fake crisis to seize control of the election nationally.

If you’ve studied history — and you know I have — that’s the moment when the hair on the back of your neck should stand up.

Because this isn’t new, creative, or even uniquely American: it’s straight out of the authoritarian playbook.

In 1933, Germany’s parliament building, the Reichstag, went up in flames at the hands of a mentally ill Dutch communist who was probably maneuvered into the act by the Nazis. Adolf Hitler declared it “proof” of an existential communist threat. Civil liberties were suspended overnight. Gone in the blink of an eye were freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and the right to assemble as Hitler’s goons began to round up his political opponents and throw them into his new concentration camp at Dachau.

Elections were technically still held, but under conditions so distorted they no longer qualified as free or fair in any meaningful sense, and the so-called “temporary” emergency became Hitler’s legal bridge to a permanent dictatorship.

Similarly, in Turkey in 2016, elements of the military tried to pull off a coup against Recep Tayyip Erdoğan while he was out of town. Erdoğan declared a national state of emergency and then kept it in place permanently. Tens of thousands of protesters were arrested. Judges and teachers were purged from their jobs, and media outlets were closed down for being “fake news.”

While emergency rule was in effect, Turkey held an election that transformed its parliamentary democracy into a hyper-presidential system tailored to give virtually all federal power to Erdoğan himself. It was the end of democracy in Turkey.

Vladimir Putin’s rise offers another variation. In 1999, a series of apartment bombings killed hundreds of Russians and the Kremlin blamed Chechen terrorists. The attacks propelled Putin, then a relatively unknown prime minister, into the presidency on a wave of fear and fury.

Putin then declared a state of emergency that expanded his police powers, gave him tighter media control, and let him seize control of the elections process. In the years since then, elections in Russia have become ritual rather than reality. The ballots are printed every few years, and the votes are counted, but the outcome is never in doubt.

Viktor Orbán in Hungary shows yet another model. He declared a “state of crisis” over migration by Syrian refugees in 2015 and kept renewing it long after migration levels collapsed. During the COVID pandemic, he got the parliament to give him the authority to rule by decree on an indefinite basis; it’s still in effect.

As a result, elections still happen (there’s one coming up), but the media landscape was completely taken over by Orbán-friendly billionaires (see: CBS, WaPo, LA Times, Fox “News,” Sinclair, Wall St. Journal, NY Post, and 1,500 rightwing radio stations). Orbán didn’t need to cancel Hungary’s elections; he simply reshaped the legal and political environment in which they happened.

There’s a common thread in all of this. The crisis wannabe dictators inevitably declare — real, exaggerated, or cynically manipulated — become the justification for seizing extraordinary powers. Those powers narrow dissent, intimidate opponents, and functionally rig the elections.

That’s why this shocking new reporting in the Washington Post is so alarming. When political actors like Corsi begin talking openly about declaring an emergency to override or interfere with elections, they’re not blowing smoke: they’re testing a classic dictator’s narrative.

They’re trying to figure out — and will learn from the national reaction to this Post reporting — whether they can persuade the public that normal election processes are too dangerous to trust. After all, in each of the cases I listed above, the machinery of democracy was used to hollow out democracy itself.

And they may not even have to manufacture an emergency: if Trump can sufficiently provoke Iran, they may activate their proxy network around the world and in the United States, and we could be facing a genuine crisis on the order of 9/11. This is one of the few ways to make sense of today’s massive military buildup in the Middle East.

The danger here isn’t just a fabricated catastrophe or a retaliatory strike by Iran, although those are pretty damn severe. It’s the normalization of the idea that if the electorate appears likely to choose “wrongly,” an emergency can justify changing the rules of democracy.

History shows us, over and over again, that when a nation loses its democracy to an aspiring autocrat, the language and strategy used is always the same. “The nation is under threat.” “The moment is an emergency.” “Normal rules must be suspended — just temporarily — to save the country.”

And in every case, “temporary” turned out to be the most dangerous word of all.

We’re now at that moment where influential figures are publicly contemplating that path, and the lesson from history isn’t subtle. The real emergency, in a constitutional republic, begins when leaders like Putin, Orbán, Erdoğan and Trump — and their toadies like Corsi, Bondi, Noem, and Gabbard — decide that elections themselves are the problem.

Multiple observers have noted that this plan is grossly unconstitutional. But so were Trump’s tariffs (which also used IEEPA emergency authority as their rationale), and the Supreme Court let him run with them for almost a year before stopping him.

Similarly, ICE goons kicking in people’s front doors and smashing their car windows to drag them off without a judicial warrant is a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, but Trump’s agents continued to do it every day. Something being against the law or the Constitution has never stopped our convicted felon/rapist/insurrectionist president in the past.

This plot will only be stopped if it’s widely reported and an outraged public rises up in opposition. Call (202-224-3121) your elected representatives — Democratic and Republican — and let them know you’re onto this plot and won’t tolerate it. And that if they have any fidelity left to the Constitution and American values, they won’t either.

B-ROLL: Governor Hochul Highlights More than 275 Million Free School Meals Serviced Across the State

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3grqcDbNE8 During National School Breakfast Week, Governor Kathy...

Old World Buffalo Ny

https://www.youtube.com/embed/nkagX7hYQOI