Buffalo Tournament Club, More Like ‘Breathalyzer Tournament Club’

FOLKS, you know for a region where we only get sunshine about 3-4 months a year, Western New York has some very legit golf options. There are a number of private courses that are well maintained and give golfers that intimate vibe they are looking for, and there’s no shortage of public options to grab some friends and have a foursome on a Saturday.

So you could imagine my surprise this weekend when it was brought to my attention that one course in the area was pulling a USS Enterprise, and going where no course has gone before.

When this was first brought to my attention, I honestly thought it was a joke…but no here it is right on their site. I had two takes. The first was elation, at finding out that ‘Flavor’ Restaurant and Bar is back open for business…thank goodness. My second was skepticism, it seemed like an absurd policy to institute. Safe to say, I wasn’t alone.

Buffalo Tournament Club is essentially becoming the movie theater that flashlights your bag to make sure you aren’t sneaking in milk duds at an 80% discount. We will see if the public outcry or just ridiculousness of the policy causes them to change.

EDIT: As of 9am Monday, the breathalyzer policy has been removed from BTC’s site.

The post Buffalo Tournament Club, More Like ‘Breathalyzer Tournament Club’ appeared first on Trainwreck Sports.

Related articles

MAGA county clerk will get new sentence in 2020 election plot



An appeals court tossed out a nine-year sentence for discredited Colorado election clerk Tina Peters.

The Donald Trump ally will be re-sentenced by a district court judge after the Colorado Court of Appeals upheld her conviction but found that Mesa County District Court Judge Matthew Barrett had wrongly based part of his sentence on Peters’ exercise of her right to free speech, reported the Denver Post.

“Notwithstanding the fact that some of the trial court’s considerations were tied to proper sentencing considerations, when the court’s comments are viewed in their totality, it is apparent that the court imposed the lengthy sentence it did because Peters continued to espouse the views that led her to commit these crimes,” the opinion states.

The "tenor" of Barrett's original sentencing order indicates that he "punished" Peters for her persistence in insisting the 2020 election had been fraudulent and that keeping her in prison was necessary to prevent her from espousing views the judge felt were "damaging," and the appeals court sent the case back to him for a resentencing.

The appellate court found there was sufficient evidence to convict Peters and that she was not immune to state prosecution, and the judges also found that a purported pardon from Trump carried no authority under Colorado law.

The court denied Peters' request that a new judge resentence her, saying that issue should be raised in a lower court, and ruled that a prosecutor’s description of her case during closing arguments had no impact on the verdict.

“The evidence of her knowledge of the illegality of her conduct is so overwhelming, we simply cannot say that the prosecutor’s statement (even if improper) had any impact on the verdict, let alone an impact so great as to cause serious doubt about the reliability of the judgment of conviction,” the panel found.

Peters, now 70, was convicted by a Mesa County jury of four felony and three misdemeanor crimes for plotting to sneak unauthorized individuals into a secure area to examine voting equipment to look for evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

Duke vs UConn CRAZIEST ENDING EVER 😱 March Madness 2026

Live Games on TNT/TruTV/TBS/CBS 📺 ⛽ SUB TO HOUSE OF HIGHLIGHTS FOR MORE 📌 Follow HoH Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/houseofhighlights 📌 Follow HoH TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@houseofhighlights #HouseofHighlights #marchmadness