Ginni Thomas’ ‘spiritual crusade’ revealed in new documentary

A documentary filmmaker explained how Ginni Thomas influenced her husband Clarence and helped him find a purpose in conservative politics.

Veteran filmmaker Michael Kirk appeared Monday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” to discuss his new PBS documentary, “Clarence and Ginni Thomas: Politics, Power and the Supreme Court,” which premiers as new revelations are published about the couple’s ties to wealthy benefactors.

“It’s very interesting,” Kirk said. “What you discover about Thomas in his life is that a set of resentments and grievances that grow out of rejection, rejection all the way across the board. When he was a little kid in Georgia living in desperate circumstances, the other Black kids made fun of him. His mother handed him over to his very stern and abusive grandfather. He goes off to the seminary to try to become the first Black priest in Savannah, Georgia. The whole community is, [the] Black community is eager for him to succeed. He fails. He comes back home, rejected by the grandfather, goes off to Yale Law School as part of Affirmative Action, he is rejected there — on and on and on. It’s a story of Clarence looking for home, and home, by the time we get to here, is rich, conservative white people.”

IN OTHER NEWS: ‘Are Americans exceptionally insane?’: Conservative lashes out at resistance to gun laws

“Ginni, her story is very, you know, Midwestern, couldn’t be more different than Clarence’s,” Kirk added. “What you discover is she grows up in a family of more conservative, [Barry] Goldwater Republicans, John Birch Society, all that. Her world becomes binary. She’s on a spiritual crusade ever since she was a young girl in Omaha. When the two get together, that’s when the sparks fly, and they aim for where they are now.”

Watch the video below or at this link.


05 08 2023 07 26 11

youtu.be

Related articles

FEMA pressures staff to rat out colleagues who have criticized Trump anonymously: report



A number of Federal Emergency Management Agency staff that openly criticized President Donald Trump are under intense investigation from FEMA leadership, and under threats of termination should they refuse to reveal the names of their colleagues who criticized Trump anonymously, Bloomberg reported Thursday.

Nearly 200 FEMA employees signed onto a letter in August pushing back against the Trump administration’s cuts to FEMA, warning that the cuts could jeopardize the agency’s ability to adequately respond to disasters.

More than a dozen FEMA employees – all of whom signed onto the letter – were soon placed on leave. Now, remaining staff that had signed onto the letter using their name are being investigated by agency leadership, being threatened to reveal the names of their colleagues who signed the letter anonymously, according to insiders who spoke with Bloomberg and documents reviewed by the outlet.

“The interviews with FEMA workers have been carried out by the agency's division that investigates employee misconduct, and those interviewed have been told they risk being fired for failure to cooperate,” Bloomberg writes in its report. “The employees have been instructed not to bring counsel, according to people familiar with the process.”

The revelation that FEMA staff under investigation were being instructed not to bring legal counsel was revealed, in part, by Colette Delawalla, the founder of the nonprofit organization Stand Up for Science, the same organization that helped FEMA staff publish its letter of dissent.

“They are not really given an option not to comply,” Delawalla told Bloomberg. “They don’t have guidance while they’re in there.”

Trump has previously said he wanted to phase out FEMA and “bring it down to the state level,” with the agency struggling to respond to emergencies such as the deadly Texas flood in July following new Trump administration policies that led to funding lapses for the agency.

A previous batch of FEMA employees – 140 of them – were placed on leave back in July for signing onto a different letter of dissent, which itself followed a number of FEMA employees being forcibly reassigned to work for Immigrations Customs and Enforcement amid Trump’s mass deportation push.

Critics have characterized the FEMA purges as a blatant violation of the Whistleblower Protection Act, which provides clear protections for government employees from retaliation for disclosing information that is a “specific danger to public health or safety.”

Top GOP leader bemoans Dems are ‘holding government funding hostage’



A high-ranking Republican is blaming Democrats over a looming government shutdown.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) penned an opinion piece for The Washington Post on Monday, claiming that leaders must avert a spending crisis with a bipartisan appropriations process and claiming "Democrats are holding government funding hostage to a long list of partisan demands, totaling more than $1 trillion. And they’re ready to shut down the government if Republicans don’t comply."

Thune was among a group of leaders slated to meet Monday with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office, which includes House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA).

This closed-door meeting is just hours before the Oct. 1 deadline. A White House official described this as a make-or-break moment. It's also the first time Trump will meet with the Democratic leaders since he took office eight months ago.

Thune argues that "Republicans are open to discussion and negotiation on a number of issues."

"But there’s a difference between careful discussion and negotiation during the appropriations process and taking government funding hostage to jam more than $1 trillion in big-government spending in a funding bill designed to last mere weeks," Thune writes. "Major decisions should not be made in haste. And they certainly shouldn’t be made because one party is threatening to shut down the government if it doesn’t get its way."

As Republicans urge Democrats to accept the bill, Democratic leaders have pushed back against cuts to healthcare.

Affordable Care Act subsidies are set to expire this year. And without an extension, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that more than 4 million people will lose healthcare over the next 10 years.

Thune claims that "Democrats have decided to abandon the process."

DNC briefs top Democrats on audit of 2024 White House loss

The Democratic National Committee is reading Democrats into its election takeaways, though an aide cautioned it does not represent the full report.