Many uncontested elections in Erie and Niagara counties; state funding could make some legislative races more competitive

So why are so many elections uncontested?  Maybe it’s a lack of interest in government.  Perhaps one-sided party enrollment discourages potential challengers.  Media reporting on local governments, which could spark interest, is greatly diminished.  Or could it be that people are just content with the only candidate up for a particular office?

Local elections are mostly held in odd-numbered year elections but there are a few on the ballot this year.  I reported last fall that in Erie County just 46 percent of the elections were contested.

The odd-year local elections system is about to change.  Starting next year local elections throughout the state, except in cities and for constitutionally created offices, will shift to even-numbered years when the president and the governor are being elected.  Total votes cast in local elections will increase, but whether that will also increase the competitiveness for local public offices remains to be seen.

Here is a summary of the contested and uncontested elections in Erie and Niagara counties this year:

  • All three congressional districts that include parts of Erie and Niagara counties officially have Democratic and Republican candidates but the offices are not really competitive.  The Republican candidate in the 26th District, Anthony Marecki, has not even created a Federal Election Commission committee.  So the first 2024 election calls in Western New York are in:  Langworthy, Tenney, and Kennedy are all re-elected.
  • In the elections for four state Senate seats in districts that are in whole or in part in the two counties, the 60th District, represented by Republican Pat Gallivan and the 62nd District, represented by Republican Rob Ortt, have no challengers.
  • In the 12 Assembly races, there are contests in all but the 139th District (Republican Stephen Hawley); the 140th District (Democrat Bill Conrad); the 141st District (Democrat Crystal Peoples-Stokes); and the 149th District (Jonathan Rivera).
  • In Erie and Niagara counties there are four state Supreme Court seats, three Buffalo City Court positions, and a Family Court seat in Niagara County that are uncontested.  There are only three candidates (two Democrats, one Republican) for two vacant Erie County Family Court judgeships.
  • There is a contest for Erie County District Attorney but not for that position in Niagara County.  The Niagara County Sheriff is running unopposed.
  • There is only one candidate on the ballot to fill the unexpired term of the Erie County legislator in the 1st District.
  • There are contests to elect three at-large members of the Buffalo Board of Education; the elections for the Board’s seats are now conducted in November.
  • There are eight Town Justice positions in Erie County plus three in Niagara County with just one candidate.
  • Two Village of Kenmore Board seats are unchallenged.
  • There are contests for the Town Council in Cheektowaga, Grand Island, and Tonawanda.
  • In Niagara County there is only one candidate for highway superintendent in the Town of Lockport.  Candidates for supervisor and two town Council seats in the town of Wilson are unopposed.

In summary:

  • There are contested elections in Erie County for Congressional Districts 23 and 26.  Six of the fifteen state legislative districts have no challengers.  In the remaining 24 elections, 6 are uncontested.
  • There is a contested election in Niagara County in the part of the county that is in the 24th Congressional District.  There are no contested state or local elections.

Public funding may make some state legislative seats competitive

New York State in 2024 began providing public funding for state legislative candidates.  While all elections are about more than just how much money a candidate can raise, the fact is that public campaign financing of seats in Western New York may in some cases result in more competitive races.

The state Public Campaign Financing Board since May been has been providing funds to candidates who applied for participation in the plan and who have submitted the required documentation of their personal fundraising activities.  Here is a summary of the state financing thus far:

  • Erie County Legislature Chair and Democratic candidate in the 63rd Senate District, April McCants-Baskin: $93,750.
  • The Democratic Assemblyman in the 142nd District, Pat Burke:  $68,355.
  • Burke’s Republican opponent, Marc Priore:  $69,175.
  • The Republican Assembly candidate in the 143rd District, Patrick Chludzinski:  $110,317.
  • The Democratic Assembly candidate in the 144th District, Michelle Roman:  $60,072.
  • The incumbent Assemblyman in the 144th District, Michael Norris, received the maximum amount for Assembly candidates ($175,000), but since he is now a candidate for state Supreme Court, he will be returning that money.
  • The incumbent Republican Assemblyman in the 145th District, Angelo Morinello:  $85,736.
  • Morinello’s Democratic opponent, Jeffrey Elder:  $51,418.
  • The Democratic candidate in the 147th District, Darci Cramer:  a total of $82,388 in three separate disbursements.
  • The Republican candidate in the 148th Assembly District, Joe Sempolinski:  $123,642.
  • The losing candidate in the Republican primary in the 147th District, Mitch Martin:  a total of $91,138.

The state money can make several of the Assembly races more competitive than they might have been if the challenging candidate was left simply raising his or her own money.  The last required campaign filing information for all committees, reported on July 15, is getting a bit dusty.  We can, however, add what the candidates’ accounts showed then together with the state money added in.  That information shows that:

  • In the 142nd Assembly District Pat Burke’s reported $27,469 in July; added to the state money – a total of $95,824.  Marc Priore’s July number was $10,482; adding in the state money – $79,657.  In addition to the advantages of incumbency Burke could receive supplemental financial support from the Democratic Assembly Campaign Committee (DACC), which has considerable resources.
  • In the 143rd Assembly District incumbent Democrat Monica Wallace reported $164,626 in her campaign account; she is not participating in the state funding program.  Her Republican opponent, Patrick Chludzinski, had $10,065 in his account.  Combined with his state funding the total becomes $120,382.  Wallace might also receive funding from DACC.
  • The Democratic candidate in the 144th Assembly District, Michelle Roman, had a balance of $6,980 in her account; with state funding her total is $67,052.  Paul Bologna, who was substituted for Norris as the Republican candidate, will not be reporting his campaign finances until September 30.  It won’t be surprising to see Norris transfer some of his personally raised campaign funds to Bologna who is Norris’ chief of staff.
  • In the 145th Assembly District Republican incumbent Angelo Morinello had a balance of $34,671; combined with his state money the total is $120,407.  Morinello’s Democratic opponent, Jeffrey Elder had $4,873; with his state funds his total – $56,291.
  • The Democratic candidate in the 147th District, Darci Cramer, had $10,741 in July; state funding brings the total to $93,129.  Incumbent Republican David DiPietro spent heavily in his successful primary, leaving him with just $16,389 in mid-July.

All candidates can continue to raise money and, provided they registered for participation last February, can also qualify for additional state funding. 

Money is not the only factor in a campaign.  The strength and credibility of the candidate and their opposition; party enrollment; and turnout, particularly in a presidential election year, will play a part in determining who wins an election.  This year’s results, when assessed against the availability of state funds, should give us some indication of value of the state’s campaign financing program.

Also hovering over the state funding are questions about the proper use of the tens of millions of dollars that are being disbursed statewide.  Several weeks ago I noted an investigation by the New York Times about funding received by one particular candidate in New York City.  Additional questionable use of funds won’t be surprising, but that information will be dependent on the hit-or-miss future audits by the Public Campaign Financing Board and the media.

X/Twitter @kenkruly

Threads   kenkruly

Related articles

UB School of Management launches Online MS in Management Information Systems

Beginning this fall, individuals who wish to advance their careers...

Mamdani promises housing ‘transformation’

Mayor Zohran Mamdani announced his housing plan blueprint for New York City in Brooklyn on Tuesday.

DAYS THE BUDGET IS LATE: 56

GETTING TO 200K: Mayor Zohran Mamdani released a wide-ranging housing plan today that he said will usher in the “largest municipal housing transformation this country has ever seen.”

The blueprint lays out how Mamdani plans to address the single biggest driver of the city’s affordability crisis, the central focus of the mayoral campaign that propelled him into City Hall.

While the plan lays out ambitious targets that would surpass past mayors if achieved — including the planned creation and preservation of a combined 400,000 affordable homes over a decade — it also illustrates how Mamdani is not reinventing the wheel on many housing issues, but rather leaning into or expanding policies pursued by his predecessors.

The plan seeks to tackle a range of coinciding crises: the severe shortage of available housing; a public housing system that’s crumbling and facing massive capital needs; and a rental housing stock that is experiencing growing distress as operating costs skyrocket.

“If the absence of good government created the conditions we now face, the presence of good government can build the solutions we now need,” Mamdani said in a speech announcing the plan in Brooklyn’s Gowanus section, where a city-led rezoning enacted nearly five years ago has spurred a residential building boom.

Mamdani is already encountering the limits of some of his campaign promises and moderating costly plans as his administration grapples with a strained municipal budget. On the campaign trail, the mayor said he would create 200,000 publicly-subsidized homes over a decade, tripling current rates of production. He is standing by that goal, while also pledging to preserve another 200,000 affordable homes.

“Scaling to these levels of affordable housing production will not be easy and cannot be done overnight,” the blueprint states. The administration is aiming to create some 14,000 affordable homes in fiscal year 2027, which starts July 1, while ramping up to 21,000 units per year by fiscal year 2031.

Under the blueprint released Tuesday, Mamdani’s housing department plans to finance 8,000 new affordable homes in fiscal years 2027 and 2028 — which would grow subsidized housing by more than 35 percent from the prior two years. But the plan does not spell out specifically how the administration will produce roughly 12,000 remaining units annually to get to Mamdani’s 200,000-unit goal.

Much of that additional affordable housing will rely on zoning, tax and other financing tools rather than direct city subsidies. And it would require the private sector to embrace those tools. — Janaki Chadha

From the Capitol

New York State Assemblymember Jeff Dinowitz said he voted in favor of the state budget bills due to favored changes for Tier VI.

‘BIG UGLY’ VOTE: The Legislature spent the better part of today plowing through votes on the budget’s “big ugly” bill, which contains most of the hot-button issues in this year’s spending plan.

“This bill has some really good stuff in it and some really bad stuff,” said Assemblymember Jeff Dinowitz, who cited Tier VI pension plan changes when speaking about his “yes” vote. “I look forward to seeing the positive impact it’s going to have on many, many state workers.”

That was the common theme that emerged among Democratic during today’s debate — they hate the rollbacks to the climate law, but they’re also supportive of the inclusion of what Republican Assemblymember Michael Fitzpatrick dubbed “the mother of all pension sweeteners” that they reluctantly voted yes. That line of reasoning appeared especially common from members who, like Dinowitz, have Democratic primaries in four weeks and stand to face attacks for being weak on the environment.

“This is not an easy vote for me,” said Assemblymember Grace Lee, who’s running for an open Senate seat and wound up backing the bill because of Tier VI.

“I am voting yes because I refuse to deny hardworking union members and retirees the retirement security they have worked years to achieve,” Assemblymember Jessica Gonzalez-Rojas said.

Gonzalez-Rojas also took time to slam the climate law changes.

“Communities like Jackson Heights, Corona, East Elmhurst, Elmhurst, LeFrak City have already experienced the consequences of environmental injustice,” she said. “Climate change is not theoretical for our communities. It is personal.”

That might be another indication of just how much budget season has blended into primary season. Not all of those neighborhoods fall within Gonzalez-Rojas’ district — but they’re a perfect description of the Senate district where she’s challenging fellow Democrat Jessica Ramos next month. — Bill Mahoney

FROM CITY HALL

Fans often gather around Madison Square Garden for watch parties during and after Knicks games.

MEANWHILE, IN KNICKS WORLD: Mamdani appeared to indicate today that watch parties will be back outside Madison Square Garden during next month’s NBA finals.

“They will be there,” Mamdani said with a laugh when asked at an unrelated press conference if the partying will resume outside the iconic arena next month when the Knicks play their first NBA finals in nearly three decades.

But a Mamdani spokesperson told Playbook that the mayor wasn’t referring to official watch parties. Rather, the spokesperson said he was talking about how Knicks fans inevitably gather outside the Garden during and after games to celebrate or mourn — oftentimes in rather raucous fashion.

Whether official watch parties — replete with massive screens showing the games — will be back outside the Garden during the finals, the Mamdani spokesperson wouldn’t say, adding that plans are still being finalized.

“It’s not a question of if there will be watch parties but where,” spokesperson Dora Pekec said.

The issue could become a bone of contention for Knicks fans.

Last week, the city pulled MSG’s permit to hold its usual large-scale parties outside the arena during Knicks games due to concerns from the NYPD about public drinking and other debauchery. During one of the Knicks’ Eastern Conference Finals games against the Cleveland Cavaliers last week, six people were arrested in connection with the outdoor watch party.

The NYPD’s decision to put the kibosh on the parties may infuriate Knicks fans who are ecstatic about their team making it to the NBA finals for the first time since 1999. Mamdani, an avid Knicks fan, is already facing tension with NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch over how to police this summer’s World Cup, as previously reported by POLITICO, and an MSG dispute could drive a further wedge.

With the outdoor party permit scrapped, MSG hosted a watch party at Radio City Music Hall for the Knicks’ clincher against the Cavs last night.

No matter what, Mamdani said at today’s press conference that Knicks fans will be able to cheer on their team at a variety of watch parties across the city during next month’s finals.

“We’re looking forward to making sure that it is a time for New Yorkers to celebrate, it’s a time that they’re also safe,” he said. “We’re going to have a number of different kinds of watch parties, and we’ll get back to you as we keep going through those plans.”

The Knicks will face either the San Antonio Spurs or Oklahoma City Thunder in the finals next month. The first game in the series is set for June 3. Chris Sommerfeldt

FROM THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL

Congressional primary debates will begin to take place in June, including the crowded NY-12 race for retiring Rep. Jerry Nadler.

DEBATE-A-PALOOZA: Got plans in June? How about a congressional primary debate — or six?

After forums galore across the city’s competitive primaries, a slew of televised debates are on the books ahead of the June 23 election: two each for the races to replace retiring Reps. Nydia Velázquez and Jerry Nadler, and another two for Rep. Dan Goldman’s primary challenge from former City Comptroller Brad Lander.

All debates will be live at 7 p.m., with the exception of the first NY-07 debate on June 3, which will be prerecorded earlier that day and air at 7 p.m. Here’s when to block off your schedule:

— June 1: Goldman and Lander will be facing off for their first televised debate, hosted by Spectrum News NY1. NY1’s Errol Louis and Courtney Gross will moderate the program.

Goldman’s campaign has frequently criticized Lander for not agreeing to partake in seven debates.

— June 3: State Assemblymember Claire Valdez, Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso and City Council member Julie Won will take the stage as they vie for Velázquez’s seat. The debate will be hosted by NY1 and moderated by Louis and Gross. Public defender Vichal Kumar is also on the ballot, though he did not qualify for the debate.

— June 4: The four leading candidates looking to succeed Nadler will meet in a PIX11 debate: state Assemblymembers Micah Lasher and Alex Bores, Kennedy scion Jack Schlossberg and anti-Trump commentator George Conway. It will be moderated by Dan Mannarino.

— June 9: Another NY-12 debate will be hosted by NY1 and WNYC. Louis and WNYC’s Brian Lehrer and Brigid Bergin will moderate. This debate is set to feature Bores, Conway, Lasher, Schlossberg and public health practitioner Nina Schwalbe.

Schwalbe, a progressive candidate who has struggled to break through in the crowded field, has frequently criticized media coverage and events for not including her. A handful of other lesser-known candidates are also on the ballot next month.

— June 10: Valdez, Reynoso and Won will partake in a PIX11 debate, with Mannarino moderating.

— June 15: PIX11 will host Goldman and Lander for another showdown, moderated by Mannarino.

Early voting starts June 13. Madison Fernandez


MUM-DANI: Mamdani is noncommittal about getting involved in the competitive race in what is now his home district.

When asked by PIX11’s Henry Rosoff who he’s voting for in the Democratic primary to succeed Nadler, Gracie Mansion’s newest resident laughed and said he hadn’t made a decision but is “following the race as a keen constituent.”

“At this time, I would say that I’ve focused on the two decisions I’ve made thus far,” Mamdani continued, referring to his endorsements for Lander and Valdez.

Bores recently said he would “love” to have Mamdani’s backing. Lasher, meanwhile, is getting campaign help from political strategist Morris Katz, an architect of Mamdani’s win last year. A recent Emerson College/PIX11 poll found that Mamdani has a strong approval rating, at 66 percent, among Democratic primary voters in the district. But a Mamdani endorsement could also turn off some Jewish voters — a prominent constituency in the district — who are not fans of the mayor.

“It was a pleasure to serve with both of them in Albany,” Mamdani said of Bores and Lasher. Madison Fernandez 

ENDORSEMENT CORNER: Abundance New York rolled out its voter guide on Tuesday, highlighting candidates in competitive races who the group’s executive director Catherine Vaughan said in a statement are “willing to actually build the things New York needs.”

They include Reynoso and Lander, as well as a dual-endorsement for Bores and Lasher. (The group said that between Bores and Lasher, it “cannot recommend one over the other at this time, but we may revisit as the race continues.”)

The endorsements aren’t exactly all glowing. In the rationale for Reynoso, it states that his “record has not always supported our agenda, but we have decided to take his evolution at face value and to commit to holding him to his word.”

The blurb about Lander acknowledged that the group has “concerns about [his] record and some of his current stances,” including opposing some rezonings during his time on the Council and supporting a ban on what the group described as “investor-owned ‘build-to-rent’ housing.” The guide also states that the group is “dismayed at his demand that Brooklyn Marine Terminal development be delayed; this is a NIMBY stance that seems cynically targeted at Goldman’s leadership on the issue.” Despite that, Abundance New York pointed to Lander’s “record on housing production, transit, and the local land-use machinery in this district” and said it thinks he “would prioritize the built environment issues that we champion more strongly.”

The group is also backing Drew Warshaw — the affordable housing nonprofit executive who’s one of two primary challengers to state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli — along with a handful of candidates in the state Legislature and City Council member Carl Wilson. Madison Fernandez

IN OTHER NEWS

THINGS GO SOUTH: Mamdani-backed congressional candidate Claire Valdez, who has called to abolish ICE, is facing scrutiny over her father’s work for a firm involved in Texas border projects. (New York Post)

WHAT’S IN A NAME: Internal renderings for the Penn Station overhaul project show a presidential seal featuring Donald Trump’s name alongside a redesigned train hall. (Gothamist)

ACROSS THE AISLE: Brooklyn’s Park Slope Food Co-op is split over a looming vote to boycott Israeli products from the socially conscious grocery store. (The New York Times)

Missed this morning’s New York Playbook? We forgive you. Read it here.

Governor Hochul Holds a Roundtable on Phone-Free Schools

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgSY0u-6VJU I fought to make New York schools...