The urgent, futile calls to halt Marcellus Williams’s execution, explained

Joseph Amrine, who was exonerated two decades ago after spending years on death row, speaks at a rally to support Missouri death row inmate Marcellus Williams on August 21, 2024, in Clayton, Missouri. | Jim Salter/AP

A 55-year-old Missouri man — who maintained he was innocent — was executed Tuesday evening, and became the latest of several recent people put to death who have renewed scrutiny of the death penalty. 

In 2001, Marcellus Williams was convicted of the 1998 killing of social worker and former St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter Felicia “Lisha” Gayle, and sentenced to death. Since his sentencing, questions have been raised about how evidence in the case was handled and whether jury selection for his trial was fair. 

Given these concerns, and Williams’s continued claims that he did not kill Gayle, he and St. Louis prosecuting attorney Wesley Bell called for the state to vacate his conviction. While his execution was previously delayed twice before, the Missouri governor and state Supreme Court have declined to do so again this past week, and he was killed by lethal injection Tuesday. 

The outstanding uncertainty in Williams’s case — and the fact that he was put to death anyway have put a new spotlight on capital punishment and many problems that have been cited with it

What are the new developments in Williams’s case?

Williams was convicted for Gayle’s murder based on the testimony of two witnesses, including his girlfriend at the time, who said she saw the victim’s purse and laptop in his car. Williams was incarcerated at the time of his conviction in the Gayle case, and his then-cellmate Henry Cole also claimed that Williams had admitted to the killing. 

Williams’s counsel argues that both witnesses had other motives for singling him out, including “reward money and a bargain for shorter sentences in their own criminal cases,” according to the Washington Post.

As USA Today notes, there wasn’t forensic evidence linking Williams to the crime, and his DNA was not found on the murder weapon — a knife. 

Since his conviction, Williams’s counsel has called for greater investigation of the DNA that was on the knife, as well as a review of racial bias in the jury selection process. Gayle’s family has also backed clemency and the possibility of a life sentence without parole. 

Previously, Williams’s counsel convinced former Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens that new testing of the DNA evidence, which included DNA from another man, had the potential to exonerate him. That led Greitens to grant a stay of execution in 2017 and to convene a panel to investigate this evidence. 

Attorneys have since learned, though, that the knife had fingerprints and DNA from a prosecutor who had touched the murder weapon without wearing gloves, contaminating the evidence. 

Williams’s allies have also argued he faced racial bias in his trial after a former prosecutor said he removed a Black juror because of his resemblance to Williams. 

Williams’s attorneys called on the US Supreme Court to grant a stay of the execution due to this evidence of bias. The Court did not do so. 

The Missouri Supreme Court also declined to grant a stay, with Judge Zel Fischer citing “no credible evidence of actual innocence or any showing of a constitutional error undermining confidence in the original judgment.”

What concerns does this raise about capital punishment? 

The use of capital punishment has waned in recent years as concerns about how well it works as a deterrent, how humane it is, and racial disparities in death sentences have grown. According to one 2016 study in Washington State, Black defendants are four times more likely to be sentenced to death than non-Black defendants in similar circumstances.

Although 27 states still allow the death penalty, 14 of those have not conducted any executions in the past 10 years, according to CNN. Executions have also dwindled since 1999, which marked a recent high when nearly 100 people were killed. In 2023, 24 people were executed across five states; currently, 24 people are expected to be executed this year.

Among the concerns raised by executions is the fear that innocent people could face these sentences. Williams’s team has been adamant that his case is an example of this issue. 

“Missouri is poised to execute an innocent man, an outcome that calls into question the legitimacy of the entire criminal justice system,” Tricia Bushnell, a Midwest Innocence Project attorney representing Williams, said in a statement before the execution. 

According to the Death Penalty Information Center, at least 200 people who were wrongly convicted and sentenced to death have been exonerated since 1973. And per a 2014 study estimate, roughly 4 percent of the people sentenced to death are innocent. 

Update, September 25, 10 am: This piece, originally published on September 24, has been updated to reflect Williams’s execution.

Related articles

What a Glorious Time for Criming in America

The Purges: FBI Edition The MAGA feedback loop continues to decimate the senior career ranks of the FBI. A quick...

Mamdani: No more mediocrity. Dare to be GREAT.

Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! MeidasTouch relies on SnapStream...

‘It’s scary’: Dem candidate speaks out after Trump admin’s ‘surreal’ prosecution of her



Progressive Democratic congressional candidate Kat Abughazaleh spoke out against President Donald Trump's administration for prosecuting her after she participated in a protest against an immigration raid in her home state of Illinois.

The indictment, which was filed on Oct. 23, accuses Abughazaleh of one count of conspiracy and one count of forcibly impeding an officer. Abughazaleh told NBC News that she plans to self-surrender to authorities next Wednesday and described the incident as "political prosecution."

Abughazaleh joined Jon Lovett, a former Obama administration staffer, on a new episode of the "Pod Save America" podcast on Thursday, and further discussed the prosecution.

"It's scary. It's surreal, and it's also totally expected," she said. "This is what this administration does. They go after people who disagree with them, and this case is an attempt to criminalize protest, to criminalize freedom of speech, and to criminalize freedom of association."

"This is what authoritarians do," she added. "They try to find any excuse to punish their political enemies, to punish populations they deem as enemies. We've seen that a lot in how ICE is functioning."

Abughazaleh noted that the Trump administration has admitted to catching very few criminals during its immigration raids. She suggested that reveals something more sinister about the raids.

"That is one of the best examples to show that this has never been about crime," she said. "This has never even been about immigration. This is about securing and cementing power for the Trump administration."

ICE sent into frenzy to return longtime Trump golf employee mistakenly deported to Mexico



A longtime former employee at one of President Donald Trump's golf clubs was mistakenly deported to Mexico, The New York Times reported — sending U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement into a mad scramble to correct the error and bring him home.

"Alejandro Juarez stepped off a plane in Texas and stood on a bridge over the Rio Grande, staring at the same border that he had crossed illegally from Mexico 22 years earlier," reported Luis Ferré-Sadurní and Hamed Aleaziz. "As U.S. immigration officials unshackled restraints bound to his arms and legs, Mr. Juarez, 39, pleaded with them. He told them he was never given a chance to contest his deportation in front of an immigration judge after being detained in New York City five days before."

As it turned out, the Department of Homeland Security had mistakenly put him on a deportation flight instead of sending him to a detention facility in Arizona ahead of his immigration hearing, to which he was entitled.

"Their actions probably violated federal immigration laws, which entitle most immigrants facing deportation to a hearing before a judge — a hearing Mr. Juarez never had," said the report. "ICE officials raced to decipher his whereabouts, exchanging bewildered emails and contacting detention facilities to pinpoint his location, according to internal ICE documents obtained by The New York Times. It is unclear how many other immigrants like Mr. Juarez have been erroneously removed, in part because ICE has not in the past tracked such cases."

Juarez "had worked for more than a decade at a Trump Organization golf club in New York," noted the report, and suddenly found himself expelled from the United States.

Similar administrative mistakes have happened on other occasions, most notably with Salvadoran migrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was deported from his family in Maryland to the infamous CECOT megaprison in his home country, despite a court order prohibiting his removal there. After months of denying they had jurisdiction to repatriate him, the Trump administration finally did so, but then immediately hit him with flimsy gang charges, and started shopping around for any other country that would accept him, including several in Africa.