74 lawsuits filed against Trump to stop his executive actions

(NewsNation) — In nearly one month since President Donald Trump’s return to the White House, at least 74 lawsuits have been filed in federal courts against his administration’s wave of executive actions.

As of Monday, judges have temporarily paused 18 of these measures.

Trump’s only victory so far was the approval of his deferred resignation buyout for government employees, a move to reduce the federal workforce. On Wednesday, U.S. District Court Judge George O’Toole declined to further pause a federal government buyout program, enabling the government to forge ahead with its “Fork in the Road” program.

Additionally, a federal judge Friday denied immediate reinstatement for eight former inspectors general fired by Trump, though the case will continue on a less urgent timeline.

Of the lawsuits, 33 are Department of Government Efficiency-related and deal with government structure and personnel, with 19 focused on immigration and citizenship.

Attorneys general from 14 states filed a lawsuit challenging the authority of billionaire Elon Musk and DOGE’s ability to access sensitive government data and exercise “virtually unchecked power.”

Nevada Attorney General Aaron D. Ford argues the government can become more efficient lawfully and with compassion.

One case, Hampton Dellinger’s, is already headed to the U.S. Supreme Court, with the government petitioning to vacate the district court’s decision to temporarily reinstate him to lead the Office of Special Counsel. Dellinger was nominated for the role by former President Joe Biden. Trump fired him earlier this month.

By signing 26 executive orders during his first day in office alone, Trump put himself on pace to rank among the fastest-acting presidents during his first 100 days in office.

Related articles

Trump Sics DOJ on Famed Victim of His Sexual Abuse

There Is No Bottom I wish I could say we have reached the nadir of President Trump’s abuse of his...

Trump BLINDSIDED as MAGA Base FULLY ABANDONS HIM!!

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald...

‘Disqualifying’ deflections from Trump’s judicial nominees alarm expert: ‘So dangerous’



Several of President Donald Trump's recent judicial nominees have displayed a "disqualifying" pattern of behavior that has alarmed a legal expert.

In hearing after hearing, Democrats have asked Trump's judicial nominees: Who won the 2020 general election? Yet several nominees have refused to explicitly say that former President Joe Biden won the election, and have instead deflected, according to Andrew Weissmann, a former federal prosecutor.

Weissmann said on a new episode of the "Court of History" podcast on Wednesday that the nominees' refusal to say Biden won the election should be "disqualifying" at least.

"There is no credible evidence," Weissmann said. "There's right-wing conspiracy talk, but there is no credible evidence of any material fraud in the 2020 election. And that to me would have been a perfectly legitimate thing to say."

Trump has routinely claimed that the election was rigged against him, even though his lawyers failed to prove that in more than 60 court cases, and some of whom have been disbarred for their involvement in Trump's efforts to overturn the results.

Weissmann noted that the nominees who refuse to acknowledge that there was no material evidence of fraud in the 2020 general election pose a significant danger to the American judiciary going forward.

"This is so dangerous that you have people who have lifetime appointments, if they are confirmed, who are going to be operating if they're consistent with how they're behaving in their confirmation hearing, as they will be on the bench. That is corrupting one of the few checks and balances that are still functioning in this country right now."