Trump’s plan to end taxes on Social Security benefits would be costly

(NewsNation) — President Donald Trump wants to eliminate income taxes on Social Security benefits, but a new analysis shows that plan comes at a steep cost and would worsen the program’s financial shortfall.

Ending taxes on benefits would reduce government revenues by $1.5 trillion over 10 years and increase the federal debt by 7% by 2054, according to estimates from the nonpartisan Penn Wharton Budget Model.

Nixing taxes would also move up the date when the Social Security trust fund is expected to run out.

As it currently stands, retirees could see their benefits slashed by 21% in roughly a decade if Congress doesn’t fix the program, which pays out more than it brings in.

Trump’s plan to end income taxes on benefits would accelerate the estimated depletion date of the Social Security Trust Fund by two years, from December 2034 to December 2032, according to the Penn Wharton Budget Model.

“I think it is a bad idea not to tax benefits for people receiving them,” said Alex Nowrasteh, the vice president for economic and social policy studies at the libertarian Cato Institute.

Nowrasteh pointed out that the Social Security Fairness Act, which Joe Biden recently signed into law, will also accelerate the program’s financial woes.

“The government is not taking seriously the fiscal problems that Social Security has,” Nowrasteh warned.

Experts previously told NewsNation that Trump’s Social Security tax promise would be hard to keep but that hasn’t stopped Republican lawmakers from trying.

Representatives Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and Daniel Webster, R-Fla., recently reintroduced the Senior Citizens Tax Elimination Act, which would end federal income taxes on Social Security benefits and boost the retirement income of older Americans.

Who gets taxed on their Social Security benefits?

About half of Social Security beneficiaries pay income tax on their benefits, according to the latest estimates from the Congressional Budget Office.

The amount of tax owed varies depending on one’s income.

As of now, individuals who earn more than $25,000 may have to pay taxes on up to 50% of their Social Security retirement benefits. For those who earn more than $34,000, up to 85% of benefits could be taxable.

One of the main critiques of the current system is that those thresholds don’t go up with inflation, so over time, more retirees have been subject to taxes on their benefits.

The counter-argument is that taxing benefits helps the government fund Social Security. Income from taxation makes up roughly 4% of what the program brings in, about $50 billion that Social Security would have to find elsewhere.

The Penn Wharton Budget Model said 95% of retirees would benefit if Trump’s campaign promise was implemented, but “all future generations would be worse off.”

And if taxes on Social Security benefits are eliminated, the biggest gains would go toward high-income retirees.

Some high-income households, who currently pay the most in taxes on Social Security benefits, would gain more than $100,000 over their lifetimes, the analysis found.

However, households in the lowest two income quintiles would see more modest gains, ranging from $1,000 to $2,000.

Meanwhile, those younger than 30 would be worse off, with newborn households losing about $10,000 in lifetime welfare, the analysis said.

The report concluded: “The policy primarily benefits high-income households nearing or in retirement while harming households under thirty and all future generations across the entire income distribution.”

Related articles

Headlines for September 29, 2025

Israel Kills at Least 50 Palestinians over the Past...

‘You were wrong, Mr. President!’ CNN warns Trump his big push has become ‘political loser’



President Donald Trump has continued to lean into his use of the military to crack down on crime in Democrat-run cities — once a politically-strong issue for him — but new data reviewed by CNN Monday shows Americans’ are quickly souring on the moves.

Trump’s latest pledge to deploy federal troops to the city of Portland, Oregon comes after his federal takeover of Washington, D.C., which itself came after Trump deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles, California. New polling, however, shows that the continued use of the military may now be doing more harm than good for Trump’s favorability.

“If Donald Trump thinks that potentially sending in the National Guard into cities like Portland is a winning political issue, the polling says you are wrong Mr. President!” said CNN’s Harry Enten.

According to the new polling data shared by Enten, Trump’s use of federal troops is now well underwater, with 58% of voters opposed. Among independent voters, that opposition rises to 64%.

“We've heard this song before, and what happened the last time that Trump sent National Guard [members] into a national city?” Enten continued.

“Well, look at the change in Trump's net approval: overall, it dropped four points! How about immigration? It dropped by seven points! We have a history of Trump sending the National Guard into a western city and what happened was there were clear political ramifications for the president of the United States, and they were not good ramifications.”

The souring of American voters on Trump’s antics also extended to Immigration Customs and Enforcement, the nation’s chief immigration agency. Enten shared data that showed net approval of ICE during Trump’s first term was at 0 points, but now, has reached a net negative 14.

“Down it goes because of their actions during the second Trump term. In fact, the Pew Research Center polled 16 different agencies; ICE's net popularity rating was 15th out of 16th, it was close to being the least popular of them all,” Enten said.

“Bottom line is the president may think this is a politically winning issue for him, but the numbers tell a very different story. It's, in fact, a political loser.”