Top intelligence officials testify about chat leak before Senate

(NewsNation) — The Senate Intelligence Committee held an open hearing Tuesday on “worldwide threats,” which quickly devolved into discussion about a bombshell account from the Atlantic’s editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg.

Witnesses included National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and FBI Director Kash Patel. Their testimonies largely centered around claims from Goldberg, who was added to a group chat for Trump administration officials.

In the chat on encrypted messaging app Signal, Goldberg said officials discussed plans for an attack against Houthi rebels in Yemen.

Gabbard and Ratcliffe were reportedly included in the message thread, though only Ratcliffe confirmed his participation during the Tuesday hearing.

John Ratcliffe, Tulsi Gabbard and Kash Patel address Signal group chat leak

Gabbard refused to confirm whether she was part of the leaked message thread, telling Warner she would not comment because the incident “is currently under review by the National Security Council.”

She later clarified that “no classified” information was included in the chat, echoing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt’s earlier claims.

During the hearing, Sen. Angus King, an independent from Maine, challenged Gabbard’s assertion that nothing sensitive was sent to the chat. King asked Gabbard to “release the whole text stream so the public could have a view as to what transpired on this discussion.”

Ratcliffe told senators the CIA permits the use of Signal for work communications.

“One of the first things that happened as CIA director was Signal was loaded onto my computer at the CIA, as it is for most CIA officers,” Ratcliffe said.

He added that, to his knowledge, using the app is entirely “permissible and lawful.”

Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., asked Ratcliffe if there were discussions about weapons packages or timing in the group chat, as reported by Goldberg.

“Not that I’m aware of,” Ratcliffe said. Gabbard backed his response: “Same answer, and defer to the Department of Defense.”

Patel said he was briefed about the situation “late last night” and did not yet have an official update from the FBI. Warner requested more information by the end of the day.

Signal chat leak shows ‘sloppy, careless’ intelligence approach: Sen. Mark Warner

Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) asks a question in the Senate.
Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) addresses National Security Agency Director General Timothy Haugh, FBI Director Kash Patel, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Central Intelligence Agency Director John Ratcliffe, and Defense Intelligence Agency Director Jeffrey Kruse as they appear during a Senate Committee on Intelligence Hearing on March 25, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Committee chairman Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., addressed the leak during his opening statement, calling the situation an example of the administration’s “sloppy, careless and incompetent” behavior surrounding classified information.  

“Were these government devices? Were they personal devices? Had devices been collected to make sure there’s no malware?” Warner asked.

“There’s plenty of declassified information that shows that our adversaries, China and Russia, are trying to break in to encrypted systems like Signal.”

He added that if an intelligence or military officer participated in a similar chat, “they would be fired.”

Sen. Michael Bennett, D-Col., admonished Ratcliffe for his testimony, yelling, “You need to do better. You need to do better.”

Multiple protesters removed from Senate hearing

WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 25: A protester is removed from the room as Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testifies during a Senate Committee on Intelligence Hearing on March 25, 2025 in Washington, DC. The hearing to examine worldwide threats comes a day after Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief for the Atlantic magazine, was inadvertently included on a high-level Trump administration Signal group chat on bombing plans in Yemen on Houthi targets. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

As Patel prepared to answer his first question from committee chairman Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., a protester interrupted the hearing.

“The biggest threat to public security is Israel, and the whole world knows it,” the person said prior to ejection from the hearing. “Stop funding Israel, stop funding Israel, stop funding Israel.”

When prompted by Cotton to speak up if anyone else had grievances, another protester began yelling and was removed.

Related articles

Journalist Tests ICE Recruitment; Surprised to Find Herself Hired with No Background Check

“They didn’t ask very many questions.” Independent journalist and...

Latino voters powered Trump’s comeback. Now they’re turning on his economy.

Hispanic small business owners are souring on the Trump economy, a warning sign to Republicans ahead of this year’s midterms.

MAGA influencer who stirred ICE attacks reveals ‘grim’ future: columnist



An analyst Wednesday described how the ICE attacks in Minneapolis and deadly shooting of Renee Good were all prompted by a MAGA influencer "chasing clicks" — and showed the potentially grim future of MAGA journalism.

The Bulwark's Andrew Egger revealed how MAGA influencer Nick Shirley's "highly misleading gonzo video" led to the chaos in Minnesota. Shirley was confronting workers at Somali-run daycares and health care centers over claims of fraud in a now-viral video created unfounded allegations that spurred into a new campaign under the Trump administration to target the Somali community.

"Within days, the White House was surging immigration enforcement to Minneapolis; Vice President JD Vance said Shirley had 'done far more useful journalism than any of the winners of the 2024 [Pulitzer] prizes,'" Egger wrote.

"If this sort of person doing this sort of work can be so richly rewarded on the right right now, it’s safe to say both that Shirley will be a major fixture of the online right for a while, and that many others will try to follow in his footsteps," Egger added. "But if he’s the future of right-wing journalism, the future is very bleak indeed."

In the past, and in traditional media, Shirley would have had oversight or rules to abide by. But that's not the case now.

"Much of the old press model has collapsed entirely, especially on the right," Eggers wrote. "Guys like Nick Shirley aren’t trying to join a publication, they’re picking up a camera and trying to go viral on their own. They have no safety net, no sounding board, no mentorship, no way to grow beyond what they’re doing this minute. All they have is the zero-sum game of the algorithm: Get noticed or die. Of course they’re going to do what the algorithm demands—which, on today’s right, means snappy, confrontational, fact-agnostic propaganda for the regime. That’s what the ecosystem rewards, so we’re going to get more and more of it. If you think that’s grim today, wait till you see the future."