The Social Security crisis, briefly explained

A sign in front of the entrance of the Security Administration’s main campus in Woodlawn, Maryland. | Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images

The Social Security Administration — which distributes benefits to tens of millions of retired workers, people with disabilities, and their families — is in crisis.

Since billionaire Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) set its sights on finding fraud in Social Security, the agency has been trying to shed 12 percent of its workforce, or 7,000 workers. Leland Dudek, who took over as acting commissioner of the Social Security Administration in February, has pushed out officials and prompted others to resign in protest of his leadership. He has canceled research contracts with universities, including one that studied demographic trends, and closed six regional offices.

Plus, the agency recently announced that it will soon no longer allow claimants to verify their identity on the phone, instead requiring them to go online or to field offices in person, a move that would likely delay people’s benefits from being delivered.

As a result, field offices have gotten so understaffed that managers have doubled up as receptionists, answering calls at the front desk because there aren’t enough people to handle the phones, according to the report in the Washington Post. Phone lines have been jammed, with beneficiaries waiting as long as four or five hours to connect with a customer service representative. Congressional offices and the AARP have noted a spike in calls from constituents concerned about their Social Security benefits. The Social Security Administration’s website has also crashed several times.

This is all happening because of Trump officials’ insistence that Social Security is mired in fraud. Trump and Musk have both falsely claimed that a large number of people who have been dead for decades are still receiving social security benefits. Despite those claims, experts say that the Trump administration is vastly overstating the problem. A federal judge who stopped Musk’s team from gaining access to sensitive personal data said that DOGE “has launched a search for the proverbial needle in the haystack, without any concrete knowledge that the needle is actually in the haystack.”

The current mess was largely anticipated. Martin O’Malley, the former Democratic governor of Maryland who served as Social Security commissioner during the Biden administration, has warned that DOGE’s actions threaten to collapse the system and interrupt benefits.

Trump has claimed that he will not cut Social Security. But his administration’s assault on Social Security (all under the guise of going after fraud, waste, and abuse) has critics worried that he’s putting Social Security onto a path toward privatization.

Trump administration officials have also acknowledged a potential disruption in Social Security payments. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, for example — a billionaire and former Wall Street executive — claimed that people wouldn’t complain if they don’t receive their Social Security payments, saying that only those committing fraud would try to raise concerns. “Let’s say Social Security didn’t send out their checks this month. My mother-in-law, who’s 94, she wouldn’t call and complain,” he said in a podcast interview. “She just wouldn’t. She’d think something got messed up, and she’ll get it next month. A fraudster always makes the loudest noise, screaming, yelling, and complaining.”

The reality, however, is that millions of people rely on Social Security to make ends meet. The program lifts more than 20 million people out of poverty each year — more than any other federal program. So if the Trump administration doesn’t quickly pull Social Security out of this crisis, a whole lot of people will complain. And Lutnick will soon find out that his prediction is likely to be very, very wrong.

Related articles

Headlines for October 8, 2025

Israeli Forces Kill 8 Palestinians Across Gaza in the...

Trump has MAJOR PANIC in AM as PLANS GET RUINED

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald...

Trump’s blunders ‘raise the risk of global conflict’ as enemies ‘gang up’: analyst



After a series of diplomatic blunders, President Donald Trump and America's reputation loss could "raise the risk of global conflict" and come at a major cost, including "mischief or worse" from enemies.

In an opinion piece published Monday, Bloomberg columnist Andreas Kluth describes how a good reputation can be difficult to obtain or maintain, and Trump "has squandered whatever credibility America had left in foreign and security policy."

Following his rambling speech last week in front of the United Nations and his struggle to see the difference between "personal chemistry" with President Vladimir Putin and diplomatic action, Trump has effectively put both adversaries and allies on edge, wrote Kluth.

"Inklings of danger are everywhere," Kluth writes. "America’s partners are becoming more anxious and making alternative arrangements for their security: Saudi Arabia just signed a defensive pact with Pakistan after watching an Israeli strike against its Gulf neighbor Qatar, which is allied to, but got no help from, the United States. America’s adversaries keep testing the resolve of Trump and the West, as Putin is doing in eastern Europe. Or, like Xi Jinping in Beijing and Kim in Pyongyang, they’re recalculating bellicose scenarios in secret. Other countries, like India, are wary of committing to America and keeping all options open, even clutching hands with Moscow and Beijing."

And although Trump is not the first president to struggle with navigating U.S. reputation among foreign nations, it puts America at an unfortunate future disadvantage.

"Against this backdrop, anybody watching US policy for the past decade, from friendly Europe to adversarial China, already had reason to doubt US credibility. What Trump has done in his second term is to remove the doubts and confirm the loss. Allies now know they can’t trust America, while adversaries are ganging up and recalculating their plans for mischief or worse.

It's unclear what will happen in the future; a damaged reputation jeopardizes diplomacy.

"These responses to America’s loss of credibility will raise the risk of global conflict," Kluth writes. "The danger will go up even more if the US, under this or a future president, panics and decides to overcompensate in reestablishing its reputation, with a demonstratively hawkish turn that could tip into war. If America and the whole world are becoming less safe, it’s because Donald Trump’s foreign policy is, literally, in-credible."