Venezuela accepts migrant flight with Tren de Aragua members: US

(NewsNation) — A plane with nearly 200 undocumented migrants landed Sunday in Venezuela as the South American country resumed accepting repatriation flights from the United States.

The arrival came after the U.S. government reached an agreement with President Nicolás Maduro, who suspended repatriation flights earlier this month when the Treasury Department pulled Chevron’s license to export Venezuelan oil.

The aircraft that landed had 199 undocumented migrants aboard, a Department of Homeland Security official tells NewsNation. They said the group included members of Trend de Aragua, the gang that the Trump administration has designated as a terrorist organization.

The landing comes a week after the Trump administration sent more than 200 alleged gang members, most of them Venezuelans, to a maximum-security prison in El Salvador.

Jorge Rodríguez, president of Venezuela’s Assembly and Maduro’s chief negotiator with the U.S., said the resumed repatriations to Venezuela would guarantee “the return of our compatriots to their nation with the safeguard of their Human Rights.”

Rodríguez said his country would work on getting the “brothers kidnapped in El Salvador” returned to their home.

Trump claims most of the deportees sent to El Salvador were TdA members, which he considers an invading force. He has sought to invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 that allows a president to summarily deport non-citizens during wartime.

A federal judge issued a temporary order halting the deportations under the 18th-century law, but the Trump administration allowed the flights to proceed last weekend. Now, the Justice Department is at loggerheads with the judge over how that occurred.

Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, told NewsNation the Trump administration will respect the judge’s ruling while continuing migrant deportations using other means.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Related articles

‘Disqualifying’ deflections from Trump’s judicial nominees alarm expert: ‘So dangerous’



Several of President Donald Trump's recent judicial nominees have displayed a "disqualifying" pattern of behavior that has alarmed a legal expert.

In hearing after hearing, Democrats have asked Trump's judicial nominees: Who won the 2020 general election? Yet several nominees have refused to explicitly say that former President Joe Biden won the election, and have instead deflected, according to Andrew Weissmann, a former federal prosecutor.

Weissmann said on a new episode of the "Court of History" podcast on Wednesday that the nominees' refusal to say Biden won the election should be "disqualifying" at least.

"There is no credible evidence," Weissmann said. "There's right-wing conspiracy talk, but there is no credible evidence of any material fraud in the 2020 election. And that to me would have been a perfectly legitimate thing to say."

Trump has routinely claimed that the election was rigged against him, even though his lawyers failed to prove that in more than 60 court cases, and some of whom have been disbarred for their involvement in Trump's efforts to overturn the results.

Weissmann noted that the nominees who refuse to acknowledge that there was no material evidence of fraud in the 2020 general election pose a significant danger to the American judiciary going forward.

"This is so dangerous that you have people who have lifetime appointments, if they are confirmed, who are going to be operating if they're consistent with how they're behaving in their confirmation hearing, as they will be on the bench. That is corrupting one of the few checks and balances that are still functioning in this country right now."

Finding a Cure for Yuna

An Extraordinary Mom and Dad By Annette Pinder Jae Lee and...

Farm worker advocate Dolores Bustamante freed from ICE

Miriam DeBadts, daughter of detained farm labor activist Dolores...