Trump signs executive order aimed at cutting prescription costs

(NewsNation) — President Donald Trump on Monday signed an executive order aimed at knocking down prescription drug prices by implementing a “most favored nation” policy.

The policy would cap costs based on other countries’ prescription prices, which Trump claimed could drop prices for Americans by 30% to 80%.

“The rest of the world’s going to have to pay a little bit more, and America’s going to pay a lot less,” Trump said.

Trump made the announcement from the White House on Monday alongside Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service administrator Mehmet Oz, FDA commissioner Martin Makary and NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya.

The order would likely only impact certain drugs covered by Medicare and given in a health care office — think infusions that treat cancer, and other injectables, the Associated Press reported.

“For years, pharmaceutical and drug companies have said that research and development costs were what they are and, for no reason whatsoever, they had to be borne by America alone,” Trump said. “Not anymore they don’t.”

Kennedy praised the policy, and Oz said that health leaders would work over the next month to figure out what the new prices could look like by approaching pharmaceutical companies.

The immediate response to Trump’s proposal over the weekend included backlash from the pharmaceutical industry.

PhRMA president and CEO Stephen J. Ubl said the “Foreign First Pricing scheme is a bad deal for American patients,” according to NewsNation partner The Hill.

“Importing foreign prices will cut billions of dollars from Medicare, with no guarantee that it helps patients or improves their access to medicines. It jeopardizes the hundreds of billions our member companies are planning to invest in America, making us more reliant on China for innovative medicines,” Ubl said.

Similar protests followed Trump’s 2020 attempt to do the same. Industry leaders argued his methods would give foreign governments an upper hand in deciding how much people pay in the U.S.

Trump has touted immediate savings, but the health department is limited in its control of drug pricing. It has the most authority around the drug prices it pays for Medicare and Medicaid, which covers roughly 80 million poor and disabled Americans. The price that millions of Americans covered by private insurance pay for drugs is harder for the agency to manipulate.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Related articles

BREAKING NEWS UPDATES IN Under 2min- 12/18/25 – 4:14pm ET

Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! MeidasTouch relies on SnapStream...

MAGA Mike RUNS FROM PRESS as Trump DESTROYS GOP

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Republican...

Disbelief as White House suggests Susie Wiles may not have known she was on record



Despite having about a year's worth of interviews — 11 to be exact — for an in-depth Vanity Fair story, White House insiders scrambled on Tuesday, suggesting to CNN that President Donald Trump's Chief of Staff Susie Wiles may not have known she was on the record.

The bombshell story prompted a White House meltdown and plenty of chatter in Washington, D.C.

"But obviously this has really left the White House and not just the White House, but Trump world as a whole in a state of shock," CNN senior White House correspondent Kristen Holmes said. "I cannot tell you how many conspiracy theories I've heard about how this interview got published, whether it was the idea that she thought she was talking off the record, whether it was the idea that she was sitting for some kind of other interview that wasn't going to be published immediately, that it has something to do with the 2028 campaign, because Susie Wiles is a calculated and political figure. Everything she does has meaning."

The interview was an unusual move for Wiles, who generally has stood guard behind the scenes.

"She is not somebody who seeks the limelight," Holmes added. "She doesn't get out there in the press and do interviews. So the fact that she did this to so many people who are close to President Trump say that it must mean something. Now, of course, again, Wiles has said that that's not the case, that it was just taken out of context. There was an omission in much of what she said. But again, this has caused quite a stir here at the White House."

Social media users responded to the story and Wiles' accusations that she might not have known the interviews were to be included in the story.

"Susie Wiles: What’s that recorder for? Reporter: Recording your answers. Susie Wiles: Right, like I’m going to say anything that’ll come back to bite me in the a--. Ha!" Chris Robinson, former referee and manager, wrote on X.

"Why would a chief of staff agree to an interview that she may now be saying she thought was off the record???. Under those circumstances it's not an 'interview,'" Duff Montgomerie, who described himself as a retired public servant, wrote on X.

"If you give multiple interviews to Vanity Fair and don’t know whether or not you are on or off the record - then you are not qualified to be a chief of staff. Speaking as a chief of staff," Dj Omega Mvp wrote on X.

"Translation: CNN can't believe Wiles would be that dumb," college instructor Anthony M. Hopper wrote on X.

"Haha! So now Wiles & the White House want to follow the rules," social worker and gerontologist Dolly Madison wrote on X.

"She’s been around long enough," retired attorney and professor Howell Ellerman wrote on X.